• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者将零售诊所视为初级保健来源的看法:对执业护士来说是福音吗?

Patients' view of retail clinics as a source of primary care: boon for nurse practitioners?

作者信息

Ahmed Arif, Fincham Jack E

机构信息

H. W. Bloch School of Management, University of Missouri-Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2011 Apr;23(4):193-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00577.x. Epub 2011 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00577.x
PMID:21489013
Abstract

PURPOSE

To estimate consumer utilities associated with major attributes of retail clinics (RCs).

DATA SOURCES

A discrete choice experiment (DCE) with 383 adult residents of the metropolitan statistical areas in Georgia conducted via Random Digit Dial survey of households. The DCE had two levels each of four attributes: price ($59; $75), appointment wait time (same day; 1 day or more), care setting-provider combination (nurse practitioner [NP]-RC; physician-private office), and acute illness (urinary tract infection; influenza), resulting in 16 choice scenarios. The respondents indicated whether they would seek care under each scenario.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost savings and convenience offered by RCs are attractive to urban patients, and given sufficient cost savings they are likely to seek care there. All else equal, one would require cost savings of at least $30.21 to seek care from an NP at RC rather than a physician at private office, and $83.20 to wait one day or more.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Appointment wait time is a major determinant of care-seeking decisions for minor illnesses. The size of the consumer utility associated with the convenience feature of RCs indicates that there is likely to be further growth and employment opportunities for NPs in these clinics.

摘要

目的

评估与零售诊所(RC)主要属性相关的消费者效用。

数据来源

通过对佐治亚州大都市统计区的383名成年居民进行随机数字拨号家庭调查开展的离散选择实验(DCE)。该DCE对四个属性各设置了两个水平:价格(59美元;75美元)、预约等待时间(当天;1天或更长时间)、护理环境 - 提供者组合(执业护士[NP] - RC;医生 - 私人诊所)以及急性疾病(尿路感染;流感),从而产生16种选择场景。受访者表明他们在每种场景下是否会寻求医疗服务。

结论

RC提供的成本节约和便利性对城市患者具有吸引力,并且在有足够成本节约的情况下,他们可能会在那里寻求医疗服务。在其他条件相同的情况下,从RC的NP处而非私人诊所的医生处寻求医疗服务,需要至少30.21美元的成本节约;等待1天或更长时间则需要83.20美元的成本节约。

对实践的启示

预约等待时间是小病寻求医疗服务决策的主要决定因素。与RC便利性特征相关的消费者效用规模表明,这些诊所的NP可能会有进一步的增长和就业机会。

相似文献

1
Patients' view of retail clinics as a source of primary care: boon for nurse practitioners?患者将零售诊所视为初级保健来源的看法:对执业护士来说是福音吗?
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2011 Apr;23(4):193-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00577.x. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
2
Patient satisfaction with retail health clinic care.患者对零售医疗诊所护理的满意度。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2009 Oct;21(10):565-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00447.x.
3
Retail-based clinics a viable resource for primary care.基于零售的诊所是初级保健的可行资源。
Nurse Pract. 2008 Mar;33(3):6. doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000312991.62715.eb.
4
Another turf war. AMA campaign against retail clinics conflicts with the evidence.又一场地盘之争。美国医学协会针对零售诊所的行动与证据相悖。
Mod Healthc. 2007 Jul 16;37(28):31.
5
Family medicine patients who use retail clinics have lower continuity of care.使用零售诊所的家庭医学患者的医疗连续性较低。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Apr 1;4(2):150-3. doi: 10.1177/2150131912471683. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
6
A nurse's perspective on retail health clinics.护士对零售医疗诊所的看法。
Front Health Serv Manage. 2008 Spring;24(3):29-32.
7
Physician office vs retail clinic: patient preferences in care seeking for minor illnesses.医疗机构与零售诊所:小病就诊患者的选择偏好。
Ann Fam Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;8(2):117-23. doi: 10.1370/afm.1052.
8
Health maintenance service: ambulatory patient care in the general medical clinic.健康维护服务:普通内科诊所的门诊患者护理。
Med Care. 1974 Aug;12(8):648-58.
9
Retail health clinics on the rise. NPs are finding new job opportunities, but with some old turf issues.零售医疗诊所数量不断增加。执业护士正在寻找新的工作机会,但也面临一些旧有的地盘问题。
Am J Nurs. 2007 Jul;107(7):25-6. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000279259.36412.88.
10
Wal-Mart not discounting health. Retail giant partnering with hospitals to boost clinics.
Mod Healthc. 2007 Nov 19;37(46):8-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.患者对初级卫生保健的偏好——离散选择实验的系统文献综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2433-7.
2
Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.药学服务的离散选择实验:一项系统评价。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):620-30. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0221-1.
3
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Sep;32(9):883-902. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x.
4
Dramatic need for cooperation and advocacy within the academy and beyond.学术界内外对合作与宣传的迫切需求。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Feb 10;76(1):1. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7611.