• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对初级卫生保健的偏好——离散选择实验的系统文献综述

Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.

作者信息

Kleij Kim-Sarah, Tangermann Ulla, Amelung Volker E, Krauth Christian

机构信息

Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2433-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-017-2433-7
PMID:28697796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5505038/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary care is a key element of health care systems and addresses the main health problems of the population. Due to the demographic change, primary care even gains in importance. The knowledge of the patients' preferences can help policy makers as well as physicians to set priorities in their effort to make health care delivery more responsive to patients' needs. Our objective was to describe which aspects of primary care were included in preference studies and which of them were the most preferred aspects.

METHODS

In order to elicit the preferences for primary care, a systematic literature search was conducted. Two researchers searched three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO) and conducted a narrative synthesis. Inclusion criteria were: focus on primary health care delivery, discrete choice experiment as elicitation method, and studies published between 2006 and 2015 in English language.

RESULTS

We identified 18 studies that elicited either the patients' or the population's preferences for primary care based on a discrete choice experiment. Altogether the studies used 16 structure attributes, ten process attributes and four outcome attributes. The most commonly applied structure attribute was "Waiting time till appointment", the most frequently used process attribute was "Shared decision making / professional's attention paid to your views". "Receiving the 'best' treatment" was the most commonly applied outcome attribute. Process attributes were most often the ones of highest importance for patients or the population. The attributes and attribute levels used in the discrete choice experiments were identified by literature research, qualitative research, expert interviews, or the analysis of policy documents.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the DCE studies show different preferences for primary health care. The diversity of the results may have several reasons, such as the method of analysis, the selection procedure of the attributes and their levels or the specific research question of the study. As the results of discrete choice experiments depend on many different factors, it is important for a better comprehensibility of the studies to transparently report the steps undertaken in a study as well as the interim results regarding the identification of attributes and levels.

摘要

背景

初级保健是卫生保健系统的关键要素,可解决人群的主要健康问题。由于人口结构变化,初级保健的重要性日益凸显。了解患者偏好有助于政策制定者和医生在努力使医疗服务更符合患者需求时确定优先事项。我们的目标是描述初级保健的哪些方面被纳入偏好研究,以及其中哪些是最受青睐的方面。

方法

为了引出对初级保健的偏好,我们进行了系统的文献检索。两名研究人员搜索了三个电子数据库(PubMed、Scopus和PsycINFO)并进行了叙述性综合分析。纳入标准为:关注初级卫生保健服务、采用离散选择实验作为引出方法、2006年至2015年间以英文发表的研究。

结果

我们确定了18项基于离散选择实验引出患者或人群对初级保健偏好的研究。这些研究总共使用了16个结构属性、10个过程属性和4个结果属性。最常应用的结构属性是“预约等待时间”,最常用的过程属性是“共同决策/专业人员对您观点的关注”。“接受‘最佳’治疗”是最常应用的结果属性。过程属性通常是对患者或人群最重要的属性。离散选择实验中使用的属性和属性水平是通过文献研究、定性研究、专家访谈或政策文件分析确定的。

结论

DCE研究结果显示对初级卫生保健存在不同偏好。结果的多样性可能有多种原因,如分析方法、属性及其水平的选择程序或研究的具体研究问题。由于离散选择实验的结果取决于许多不同因素,为了更好地理解这些研究,透明地报告研究中采取的步骤以及关于属性和水平识别的中期结果非常重要。

相似文献

1
Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.患者对初级卫生保健的偏好——离散选择实验的系统文献综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2433-7.
2
Patients' Preferences for Outcome, Process and Cost Attributes in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.患者对癌症治疗结局、过程和成本属性的偏好:离散选择实验的系统评价。
Patient. 2017 Oct;10(5):553-565. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0235-y.
3
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
4
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
8
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analyses in Health Screening Programs for Type 2 Diabetes and Liver Disease: A Scoping Review.2型糖尿病和肝病健康筛查项目中的离散选择实验与联合分析:一项范围综述
Can Liver J. 2025 Feb 25;8(1):63-78. doi: 10.3138/canlivj-2024-0050. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Patient preferences for diagnostic imaging services: Decentralize or not?患者对诊断成像服务的偏好:是否去中心化?
PLoS One. 2025 May 16;20(5):e0301404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301404. eCollection 2025.
3
How Stable Are Individual Preferences for Health Expenditure in Germany?

本文引用的文献

1
Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice.量化健康和医疗保健偏好的选择实验:实践现状
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Jun;14(3):253-66. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0232-7.
2
Determinants of the choice of GP practice registration in England: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.英格兰全科医生诊所注册选择的决定因素:来自离散选择实验的证据。
Health Policy. 2015 Apr;119(4):427-36. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
3
The effect of including an opt-out option in discrete choice experiments.
德国个人对医疗支出的偏好有多稳定?
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 6;13(9):1074. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13091074.
4
Examining national health insurance fund members' preferences and trade-offs for the attributes of contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya: A discrete choice experiment.考察肯尼亚国家医疗保险基金成员对签约门诊设施属性的偏好及权衡:一项离散选择实验
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 28;5(4):e0003557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003557. eCollection 2025.
5
Patient preferences for key organizational features of primary cardiovascular care in Quebec: a discrete choice experiment.魁北克原发性心血管护理关键组织特征的患者偏好:一项离散选择实验
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Apr 10;26(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02810-4.
6
Which questionnaires can be used to elicit patients' preferences regarding patient-provider consultations? Results of a scoping review.哪些问卷可用于了解患者对医患咨询的偏好?一项范围综述的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12567-2.
7
Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?便利性还是连续性:患者何时愿意等待看自己的医生?
Ann Fam Med. 2025 Mar 24;23(2):151-157. doi: 10.1370/afm.240299.
8
Unveiling Preferences in Closed Communities: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) Questionnaire to Elicit Ultra-Orthodox Women Preferences for Video Consultations in Primary Care.揭示封闭社区中的偏好:开发离散选择实验(DCE)问卷以引出极端正统派女性对初级保健视频咨询的偏好。
Patient. 2025 May;18(3):263-277. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00734-w. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
9
Task Shifting, eHealth and Shared Decision-Making-Preference Heterogeneity in the Adult Population for Developments in Outpatient Primary Healthcare.任务转移、电子健康与共同决策——成年人群对门诊初级医疗保健发展的偏好异质性
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70060. doi: 10.1111/hex.70060.
10
Preference for community health services in people with chronic diseases: a discrete choice experiment in China.慢性病患者对社区卫生服务的偏好:一项中国的离散选择实验
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 20;12:1479237. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1479237. eCollection 2024.
在离散选择实验中纳入退出选项的效果。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 3;9(11):e111805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111805. eCollection 2014.
4
Decision-making criteria among European patients: exploring patient preferences for primary care services.欧洲患者的决策标准:探索患者对初级保健服务的偏好。
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Feb;25(1):3-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku082. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
5
Patients' valuation of the prescribing nurse in primary care: a discrete choice experiment.患者对初级医疗保健中开处方护士的评价:一项离散选择实验。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2223-35. doi: 10.1111/hex.12193. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
6
Applying discrete choice modelling in a priority setting: an investigation of public preferences for primary care models.在优先事项设定中应用离散选择模型:对公众对初级保健模式偏好的调查。
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Sep;15(7):773-85. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0542-8. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
7
Valuing the extended role of prescribing pharmacist in general practice: results from a discrete choice experiment.重视执业药师在全科医疗中的扩展作用:来自离散选择实验的结果。
Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):699-707. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.006. Epub 2012 May 23.
8
Predicting the place of out-of-hours care--a market simulation based on discrete choice analysis.预测非工作时间医疗服务的地点——基于离散选择分析的市场模拟。
Health Policy. 2012 Aug;106(3):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.04.010. Epub 2012 May 15.
9
Do general practitioners know patients' preferences? An empirical study on the agency relationship at an aggregate level using a discrete choice experiment.全科医生了解患者的偏好吗?使用离散选择实验对代理关系进行总体层面的实证研究。
Value Health. 2012 May;15(3):514-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
10
Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.联合分析在健康领域的应用——检查表:ISPOR 联合分析实践良好研究报告任务组报告。
Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):403-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013. Epub 2011 Apr 22.