Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital and Fu-Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 May;65(5):552-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02638.x.
To investigate the diagnostic value of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) voiding-to-storage subscore ratio (IPSS-V/S) in male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).
A total of 253 men with LUTS were enrolled from January 2005 to July 2010. The voiding (IPSS-V) and storage IPSS (IPSS-S) subscores were recorded separately by the patients themselves. The IPSS-V/S was calculated and compared among various aetiologies based on videourodynamic studies. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed for comparing the diagnostic value of various non-invasive methods for predicting failure to voiding and storage lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD).
Patients with failure to voiding LUTD, including benign prostatic obstruction (n = 72), bladder neck dysfunction (n = 19), urethral stricture (n = 3) and poor relaxation of the urethral sphincter (n = 32), had mean IPSS-V/S scores > 1. In contrast, patients who were urodynamically normal (n = 2) or had failure to storage LUTD, including idiopathic detrusor overactivity (n = 84), increased bladder sensation (n = 37), and detrusor overactivity and impaired contractility (n = 4), had IPSS-V/S scores ≤ 1. When IPSS-V/S was used to differentiate male LUTS, failure to voiding LUTD was found in 81.2% of patients with IPSS scores > 1, while failure to storage LUTD was found in 75.7% of patients with IPSS-V/S ≤ 1. The area under ROC curve of IPSS-V/S was higher than for other non-invasive methods for predicting failure to voiding and storage LUTD.
Measuring IPSS subscores and calculating IPSS-V/S is a simple and useful method to differentiate failure to voiding and failure to storage LUTD in men with LUTS. IPSS-V/S may provide a guide for the initial treatment, especially for primary care physicians without access to urological studies.
探讨国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)排尿-储尿分项评分比值(IPSS-V/S)在男性下尿路症状(LUTS)中的诊断价值。
2005 年 1 月至 2010 年 7 月,共纳入 253 例 LUTS 男性患者。由患者本人分别记录排尿(IPSS-V)和储尿 IPSS(IPSS-S)分项评分。根据尿动力学研究,计算并比较各种病因的 IPSS-V/S。构建受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,比较各种非侵入性方法预测排尿失败和储尿下尿路功能障碍(LUTD)的诊断价值。
排尿失败 LUTD 患者,包括良性前列腺增生症(n=72)、膀胱颈功能障碍(n=19)、尿道狭窄(n=3)和尿道括约肌松弛不良(n=32),其平均 IPSS-V/S 评分>1。相反,尿动力学正常(n=2)或储尿失败 LUTD 患者,包括特发性逼尿肌过度活动症(n=84)、膀胱感觉增加(n=37)和逼尿肌过度活动伴收缩力受损(n=4),其 IPSS-V/S 评分≤1。当使用 IPSS-V/S 区分男性 LUTS 时,IPSS 评分>1 的患者中 81.2%存在排尿失败 LUTD,而 IPSS-V/S≤1 的患者中 75.7%存在储尿失败 LUTD。IPSS-V/S 的 ROC 曲线下面积高于其他预测排尿和储尿失败 LUTD 的非侵入性方法。
测量 IPSS 分项评分并计算 IPSS-V/S 是区分男性 LUTS 患者排尿失败和储尿失败的简单而有用的方法。IPSS-V/S 可能为初始治疗提供指导,特别是对于无法进行泌尿科研究的初级保健医生。