• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用吡格列酮的2型糖尿病患者药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的三年临床结果

Three-year clinical outcome in type 2 diabetic patients with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents with pioglitazone.

作者信息

Nishio Kazuaki, Hosaka Michio, Shigemitsu Meiei, Kobayashi Youichi

机构信息

The Third Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;12(4):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2009.10.003. Epub 2011 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2009.10.003
PMID:21489889
Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to examine outcome subsequent to implantation of bare-metal stents (BMS) with pioglitazone, which are novel insulin-sensitizing agents, and drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with diabetes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 139 consecutive Type 2 diabetic patients treated with stent were followed up for 3 years. Data on death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stent thrombosis were ascertained from January 2003 to January 2006. Eighty-nine patients were treated with a BMS with pioglitazone, and 50 patients were treated with a DES. The incidence of MI was 1.1% in the BMS with pioglitazone group, 4.0% in the DES group [relative risk RR):0.52; 95% CI: 0.10-2.56]. The incidence of TLR was 22.5% in the BMS with pioglitazone group, 28.0% in the DES group (RR 0.89; 95% CI: 0.65-1.22). The incidence of stent thrombosis was 1.0% in the BMS with pioglitazone group, 4.0% in the DES group (RR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.10-2.56). Overall 3-year mortality was similar in the two groups (RR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.34-1.74).

CONCLUSIONS

During 3 years of follow-up, patients treated with BMS with pioglitazone had similar risks of death, TLR, MI, and stent thrombosis compared with patients treated with DES.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨使用新型胰岛素增敏剂吡格列酮的裸金属支架(BMS)和药物洗脱支架(DES)植入术后糖尿病患者的预后情况。

方法与结果

连续纳入139例接受支架治疗的2型糖尿病患者,随访3年。收集2003年1月至2006年1月期间有关死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、靶病变血运重建(TLR)和支架血栓形成的数据。89例患者接受了含吡格列酮的BMS治疗,50例患者接受了DES治疗。含吡格列酮的BMS组MI发生率为1.1%,DES组为4.0%[相对风险(RR):0.52;95%置信区间(CI):0.10 - 2.56]。含吡格列酮的BMS组TLR发生率为22.5%,DES组为28.0%(RR 0.89;95% CI:0.65 - 1.22)。含吡格列酮的BMS组支架血栓形成发生率为1.0%,DES组为4.0%(RR 0.52;95% CI:0.10 - 2.56)。两组总体3年死亡率相似(RR 0.77;95% CI:0.34 - 1.74)。

结论

在3年随访期间,与接受DES治疗的患者相比,接受含吡格列酮的BMS治疗的患者在死亡、TLR、MI和支架血栓形成方面的风险相似。

相似文献

1
Three-year clinical outcome in type 2 diabetic patients with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents with pioglitazone.使用吡格列酮的2型糖尿病患者药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的三年临床结果
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;12(4):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2009.10.003. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
2
Clinical outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting and bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行药物洗脱支架和金属裸支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床转归。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec;1(3):176-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.794578.
3
2-year clinical outcomes after implantation of sirolimus-eluting, paclitaxel-eluting, and bare-metal coronary stents: results from the WDHR (Western Denmark Heart Registry).西罗莫司洗脱、紫杉醇洗脱和裸金属冠状动脉支架植入术后的2年临床结局:来自WDHR(丹麦西部心脏登记处)的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Feb 24;53(8):658-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.058.
4
[Clinical and angiographic outcome in coronary artery disease patients with type-II diabetes mellitus undergoing elective bare-metal stenting or drug-eluting stenting].[接受择期裸金属支架置入术或药物洗脱支架置入术的II型糖尿病冠状动脉疾病患者的临床及血管造影结果]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2007 Jun;35(6):523-6.
5
Comparison of stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and mortality following drug-eluting versus bare-metal stent coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架冠状动脉介入治疗后支架内血栓形成、心肌梗死及死亡率的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jul 15;102(2):165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.03.034. Epub 2008 May 28.
6
Drug-eluting or bare-metal stenting in patients with diabetes mellitus: results from the Massachusetts Data Analysis Center Registry.糖尿病患者的药物洗脱支架或裸金属支架置入术:来自马萨诸塞州数据分析中心注册研究的结果
Circulation. 2008 Nov 25;118(22):2277-85, 7p following 2285. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.820159. Epub 2008 Nov 10.
7
Target lesion revascularization after bare-metal or drug-eluting stents: clinical presentations and outcomes.裸金属支架或药物洗脱支架置入术后靶病变血运重建:临床表现与结局
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Jun;22(6):266-70.
8
Outcome differences with the use of drug-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents versus drug-eluting stents.使用药物洗脱支架治疗裸金属支架与药物洗脱支架的支架内再狭窄的疗效差异。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Feb 15;103(4):491-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.09.107.
9
Clinical outcomes following drug-eluting versus bare metal stent implantation for lesion subsets excluded from pivotal clinical trials: findings from the GHOST Study (Guthrie Health System Off-Label StenT Study).药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架植入治疗关键临床试验排除的病变亚组后的临床结局:GHOST研究(格思里医疗系统非标签支架研究)的结果
J Interv Cardiol. 2008 Aug;21(4):315-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2008.00380.x.
10
Long-term clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for treatment of restenosis within bare-metal versus drug-eluting stents.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入治疗裸金属支架与药物洗脱支架内再狭窄后的长期临床结局。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Apr 1;71(5):594-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21399.