Liu Xueqi, Wang Hong-Wei
Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, USA.
J Vis Exp. 2011 Mar 28(49):2574. doi: 10.3791/2574.
Single particle electron microscopy (EM) reconstruction has recently become a popular tool to get the three-dimensional (3D) structure of large macromolecular complexes. Compared to X-ray crystallography, it has some unique advantages. First, single particle EM reconstruction does not need to crystallize the protein sample, which is the bottleneck in X-ray crystallography, especially for large macromolecular complexes. Secondly, it does not need large amounts of protein samples. Compared with milligrams of proteins necessary for crystallization, single particle EM reconstruction only needs several micro-liters of protein solution at nano-molar concentrations, using the negative staining EM method. However, despite a few macromolecular assemblies with high symmetry, single particle EM is limited at relatively low resolution (lower than 1 nm resolution) for many specimens especially those without symmetry. This technique is also limited by the size of the molecules under study, i.e. 100 kDa for negatively stained specimens and 300 kDa for frozen-hydrated specimens in general. For a new sample of unknown structure, we generally use a heavy metal solution to embed the molecules by negative staining. The specimen is then examined in a transmission electron microscope to take two-dimensional (2D) micrographs of the molecules. Ideally, the protein molecules have a homogeneous 3D structure but exhibit different orientations in the micrographs. These micrographs are digitized and processed in computers as "single particles". Using two-dimensional alignment and classification techniques, homogenous molecules in the same views are clustered into classes. Their averages enhance the signal of the molecule's 2D shapes. After we assign the particles with the proper relative orientation (Euler angles), we will be able to reconstruct the 2D particle images into a 3D virtual volume. In single particle 3D reconstruction, an essential step is to correctly assign the proper orientation of each single particle. There are several methods to assign the view for each particle, including the angular reconstitution(1) and random conical tilt (RCT) method(2). In this protocol, we describe our practice in getting the 3D reconstruction of yeast exosome complex using negative staining EM and RCT. It should be noted that our protocol of electron microscopy and image processing follows the basic principle of RCT but is not the only way to perform the method. We first describe how to embed the protein sample into a layer of Uranyl-Formate with a thickness comparable to the protein size, using a holey carbon grid covered with a layer of continuous thin carbon film. Then the specimen is inserted into a transmission electron microscope to collect untilted (0-degree) and tilted (55-degree) pairs of micrographs that will be used later for processing and obtaining an initial 3D model of the yeast exosome. To this end, we perform RCT and then refine the initial 3D model by using the projection matching refinement method(3).
单颗粒电子显微镜(EM)重构技术近来已成为获取大型大分子复合物三维(3D)结构的常用工具。与X射线晶体学相比,它具有一些独特优势。首先,单颗粒EM重构无需使蛋白质样品结晶,而结晶是X射线晶体学的瓶颈,对于大型大分子复合物尤其如此。其次,它不需要大量蛋白质样品。与结晶所需的毫克级蛋白质相比,采用负染色EM方法时,单颗粒EM重构仅需要几微升纳摩尔浓度的蛋白质溶液。然而,尽管有一些具有高对称性的大分子组装体,但对于许多标本,尤其是那些没有对称性的标本,单颗粒EM在相对较低分辨率(低于1纳米分辨率)下受到限制。该技术还受所研究分子大小的限制,即一般来说,负染色标本为100 kDa,冷冻水合标本为300 kDa。对于一个未知结构的新样品,我们通常使用重金属溶液通过负染色来包埋分子。然后将标本置于透射电子显微镜下,拍摄分子的二维(2D)显微照片。理想情况下,蛋白质分子具有均匀的3D结构,但在显微照片中呈现不同的取向。这些显微照片被数字化并在计算机中作为“单颗粒”进行处理。使用二维对齐和分类技术,将相同视图中的均匀分子聚类成类。它们的平均值增强了分子2D形状的信号。在为颗粒分配适当的相对取向(欧拉角)后,我们就能将2D颗粒图像重构为3D虚拟体积。在单颗粒3D重构中,一个关键步骤是正确分配每个单颗粒的适当取向。有几种方法可为每个颗粒分配视图,包括角度重构法(1)和随机锥形倾斜(RCT)法(2)。在本方案中,我们描述了使用负染色EM和RCT对酵母外泌体复合物进行3D重构的实践。应当指出,我们的电子显微镜和图像处理方案遵循RCT的基本原理,但不是执行该方法的唯一途径。我们首先描述如何使用覆盖有一层连续薄碳膜的多孔碳网,将蛋白质样品包埋到一层厚度与蛋白质大小相当的甲酸铀酰中。然后将标本插入透射电子显微镜中,收集未倾斜(0度)和倾斜(55度)的显微照片对,这些照片随后将用于处理并获得酵母外泌体的初始3D模型。为此,我们进行RCT,然后使用投影匹配细化法(3)对初始3D模型进行细化。