• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雇主对老年工人的行为是否正在发生变化?对 2000-2009 年雇主调查的分析。

Are employers changing their behavior toward older workers? An analysis of employers' surveys 2000-2009.

机构信息

Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Aging Soc Policy. 2011 Apr;23(2):141-58. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2011.551612.

DOI:10.1080/08959420.2011.551612
PMID:21491304
Abstract

This article addresses possible changes in Dutch employers' behavior regarding the recruitment and retention of older workers during the last decade. The authors analyze surveys administered to Dutch employers in 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008, and 2009. The results show that efforts to recruit older workers are changing, congruous with the economic climate, while retention behavior shows a clear and rather gradual time effect. The authors conclude that the position of older workers has improved between 2000 and 2008 and has done so in comparison with other underrepresented groups in the labor market. During the recession, recruitment of older workers declined substantially, while efforts to retain older workers are in both absolute and relative terms higher than in 2000. With respect to organizational policies, the authors conclude that throughout the period under observation these policies are dominated by measures that "spare" older workers.

摘要

本文探讨了在过去十年中,荷兰雇主在招聘和留住老年员工方面行为可能发生的变化。作者分析了 2000 年、2002 年、2005 年、2008 年和 2009 年对荷兰雇主进行的调查。结果表明,招聘老年员工的努力正在发生变化,与经济环境一致,而保留行为则表现出明显且相当渐进的时间效应。作者得出结论,与劳动力市场中其他代表性不足的群体相比,2000 年至 2008 年期间老年员工的地位有所提高。在经济衰退期间,老年员工的招聘大幅下降,而留住老年员工的努力在绝对值和相对值上都高于 2000 年。关于组织政策,作者得出的结论是,在整个观察期间,这些政策主要由“保护”老年员工的措施主导。

相似文献

1
Are employers changing their behavior toward older workers? An analysis of employers' surveys 2000-2009.雇主对老年工人的行为是否正在发生变化?对 2000-2009 年雇主调查的分析。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2011 Apr;23(2):141-58. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2011.551612.
2
Retaining the older workforce: social policy considerations for the universally designed workplace.留住老年劳动力:通用设计工作场所的社会政策考虑
J Aging Soc Policy. 2011 Apr;23(2):119-40. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2011.551623.
3
Recharging or Retiring Older Workers? Uncovering the Age-Based Strategies of European Employers.为老员工“充电”还是让其“退休”?揭示欧洲雇主的基于年龄的策略。
Gerontologist. 2015 Oct;55(5):814-24. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu048. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
4
Employers' knowledge and attitudes regarding organizational policy toward workers caring for aging family members.雇主对员工照顾老年家庭成员的组织政策的了解和态度。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2011 Apr;23(2):159-81. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2011.554120.
5
Perception versus Official Data: Employers' Knowledge about the Aging Workforce.感知与官方数据:雇主对老龄化劳动力的了解。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2021 Mar-Apr;33(2):177-199. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1769535. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
6
Managing age discrimination: an examination of the techniques used when seeking employment.应对年龄歧视:求职时所用技巧的审视
Gerontologist. 2009 Jun;49(3):317-32. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp031. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
7
Discrimination of older workers in Germany: obstacles and options for the integration into employment.德国老年工人的歧视:融入就业的障碍与选择
J Aging Soc Policy. 1997;9(1):89-101. doi: 10.1300/J031v09n01_08.
8
Israeli employers' hiring intentions for recruiting employees with disabilities: how do they compare with US employers?以色列雇主招聘残疾员工的招聘意向:与美国雇主相比情况如何?
J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil. 2013;12(3):176-93. doi: 10.1080/1536710X.2013.810097.
9
Employers' knowledge and utilization of accommodations.雇主对便利措施的了解与使用情况。
Work. 2003;21(1):5-15.
10
Devolution of employment and training policy: the case of older workers.就业与培训政策的下放:老年工人的案例
J Aging Soc Policy. 2002;14(3-4):37-60. doi: 10.1300/J031v14n03_03.

引用本文的文献

1
Becoming the employer of choice: anticipating and preparing for a graying workforce in industry.成为首选雇主:预测并为行业劳动力老龄化做好准备。
SN Soc Sci. 2022;2(9):173. doi: 10.1007/s43545-022-00480-y. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
2
The Effects of Retention Measures on Retirement Timing-Do Financial Crises Matter?留用措施对退休时间的影响——金融危机重要吗?
Front Sociol. 2019 Sep 18;4:68. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00068. eCollection 2019.
3
The Proactive Shift in Managing an Older  Workforce 2009-2017: A Latent Class Analysis of Organizational Policies.
2009-2017 年积极管理老年劳动力的转变:组织政策的潜在类别分析。
Gerontologist. 2020 Nov 23;60(8):1515-1526. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa037.
4
Employees' Longer Working Lives in Europe: Drivers and Barriers in Companies.欧洲员工的长寿工作生涯:公司的驱动因素和障碍。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 4;17(5):1658. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051658.
5
Biased media? How news content influences age discrimination claims.有偏见的媒体?新闻内容如何影响年龄歧视索赔。
Eur J Ageing. 2018 Mar 10;16(1):109-119. doi: 10.1007/s10433-018-0465-4. eCollection 2019 Mar.
6
Employers' Adjustment to Longer Working Lives.雇主对更长工作寿命的调整。
Innov Aging. 2019 Feb 4;3(1):igy040. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igy040. eCollection 2019 Jan.