• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《患者安全与质量改进法案》对报告患者错误的新法律保护:医学文献回顾与分析。

New legal protections for reporting patient errors under the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act: a review of the medical literature and analysis.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5801 Smith Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21209, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2010 Sep;6(3):147-52. doi: 10.1097/pts.0b013e3181ed623a.

DOI:10.1097/pts.0b013e3181ed623a
PMID:21491787
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act (PSQIA) of 2005, inspired by the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) 1999 report To Err Is Human, affords federal protections in exchange for error disclosures. However, the PSQIA is unlikely to be effective unless frontline providers are aware of its existence. In this study, we assessed the quantity of publications regarding this protection within the medical literature.

METHODS

Four reviewers independently evaluated 2060 safety-related articles, identified through a PubMed database search, to determine whether they discussed actual (or proposed) national legal protections for voluntary reporting of medical errors. Using a reviewer method based on a standard Delphi consensus model, agreement was achieved if at least 3 of 4 reviewers agreed with the decision.

RESULTS

Articles were separated into pre-IOM report (1990-1999) and post-IOM report (2000-2008) literature. No articles were determined to be "on topic" in the pre-IOM period (n = 624). Twenty-seven articles were considered "on topic" in the post-IOM period (n = 1436), constituting 1.8% of the period total (95% confidence interval, 1.2%-2.6%). Of the 27 on topic articles, 7 appeared in practice-related journals, whereas the remaining 20 were in journals with a health policy or health care administration focus.

CONCLUSIONS

Few published studies were found in clinical journals describing the PSQIA. This raises serious concerns and indicates that physicians may not be aware of the new legal protections afforded for error disclosure. If the health care system is to realize the benefits of error reporting systems, greater education of physicians regarding their legal protections may be needed.

摘要

目的

2005 年的《患者安全与质量改进法案》(PSQIA)是受医学研究所(IOM)1999 年报告《犯错是人》的启发而制定的,它提供了联邦保护,以换取对错误的披露。然而,除非一线医护人员意识到该法案的存在,否则 PSQIA 不太可能有效。在这项研究中,我们评估了医学文献中关于该保护的出版物数量。

方法

四位审稿人独立评估了通过 PubMed 数据库搜索确定的 2060 篇与安全相关的文章,以确定它们是否讨论了自愿报告医疗错误的实际(或拟议的)国家法律保护。使用基于标准 Delphi 共识模型的审稿人方法,如果至少有 4 位审稿人中的 3 位同意该决定,则达成一致意见。

结果

文章分为 IOM 报告前(1990-1999 年)和 IOM 报告后(2000-2008 年)文献。在 IOM 报告前的时期(n=624),没有一篇文章被确定为“相关主题”。在 IOM 报告后的时期(n=1436),有 27 篇文章被认为是“相关主题”,占该时期总数的 1.8%(95%置信区间,1.2%-2.6%)。在 27 篇相关主题文章中,有 7 篇发表在实践相关的期刊上,而其余 20 篇则发表在卫生政策或卫生保健管理重点的期刊上。

结论

在临床期刊中发现的描述 PSQIA 的已发表研究很少。这引起了严重的关注,并表明医生可能不知道为错误披露提供的新的法律保护。如果医疗保健系统要实现错误报告系统的好处,可能需要对医生进行更多关于其法律保护的教育。

相似文献

1
New legal protections for reporting patient errors under the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act: a review of the medical literature and analysis.《患者安全与质量改进法案》对报告患者错误的新法律保护:医学文献回顾与分析。
J Patient Saf. 2010 Sep;6(3):147-52. doi: 10.1097/pts.0b013e3181ed623a.
2
Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005.2005年患者安全与质量改进法案
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 May;40(5):917-24. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G485. Epub 2006 Apr 25.
3
Patient safety and quality improvement: a policy assessment.患者安全与质量改进:一项政策评估。
Clin Lab Sci. 2010 Fall;23(4):212-8.
4
Medical errors: five years after the IOM report.医疗差错:医学研究所报告发布五年后
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2005 Jul(830):1-15.
5
Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005.2005年《患者安全与质量改进法案》
Orthop Nurs. 2007 Jan-Feb;26(1):14-6; quiz 17-8. doi: 10.1097/00006416-200701000-00005.
6
Truth-telling and the law: the bottom line of the Institute of Medicine's report on error.讲真话与法律:医学研究所关于医疗差错报告的底线
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004 Jan;59(1):5-8. doi: 10.1097/01.OGX.0000102502.93358.9A.
7
The challenges to transparency in reporting medical errors.报告医疗差错透明度面临的挑战。
J Patient Saf. 2009 Dec;5(4):205-9. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181be2a88.
8
Reworking the patient safety equation with liability, culture and health courts.通过责任、文化和健康法庭重塑患者安全等式。
Med Health R I. 2006 Nov;89(11):381-3.
9
Medical error as false claim.医疗差错作为虚假索赔。
Am J Law Med. 2001;27(2-3):181-201.
10
Federal legislation efforts to improve patient safety.联邦立法致力于提高患者安全。
Eff Clin Pract. 2000 Nov-Dec;3(6):309-12.

引用本文的文献

1
A multifaceted risk management program to improve the reporting rate of patient safety incidents in primary care: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.一个多方面的风险管理计划,以提高初级保健中患者安全事件的报告率:一项集群随机对照试验。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 6;25(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02476-4.
2
Using a Second Stakeholder-Driven Variance Reporting System Improves Pediatric Perioperative Safety.使用第二个利益相关者驱动的差异报告系统可提高儿科围手术期安全性。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019 Sep 23;4(5):e220. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000220. eCollection 2019 Sep-Oct.
3
Measuring and improving patient safety through health information technology: The Health IT Safety Framework.
通过健康信息技术衡量和改善患者安全:健康信息技术安全框架。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):226-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004486. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
4
WHO Efforts to Promote Reporting of Adverse Events and Global Learning.世界卫生组织促进不良事件报告及全球学习的努力。
J Public Health Res. 2013 Dec 1;2(3):e29. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2013.e29.