Family Medicine Department, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, Lyon, 69008, France.
Service Recherche Et Épidémiologie Clinique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pole de Santé Publique, 162 Avenue Lacassagne, Lyon, 69003, France.
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 6;25(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02476-4.
While patient safety incident reporting is of key importance for patient safety in primary care, the reporting rate by healthcare professionals remains low. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a risk management program in increasing the reporting rate within multiprofessional primary care facilities.
A nation-wide cluster-randomised controlled trial was performed in France, with each cluster defined as a primary care facility. The intervention included professional e-learning training, identification of a risk management advisor, and multidisciplinary meetings to address incident analysis. In the first observational period, a patient safety incident reporting system for professionals was implemented in all facilities. Then, facilities were randomised, and the program was implemented. Incidents were reported over the 15-month study period. Quasi-Poisson models were used to compare reporting rates.
Thirty-five facilities (intervention, n = 17; control, n = 18) were included, with 169 and 232 healthcare professionals, respectively, involved. Overall, 7 out of 17 facilities carried out the entire program (41.2%), while 6 did not hold meetings (35.3%); 48.5% of professionals logged on to the e-learning website. The relative rate of incidents reported was 2.7 (95% CI = [0.84-11.0]; p = 0.12). However, a statistically significant decrease in the incident rate between the pre-intervention and post-intervention periods was observed for the control arm (HR = 0.2; 95% CI = [0.05-0.54]; p = 0.02), but not for the intervention arm (HR = 0.54; 95% CI = [0.2-1.54]; p = 0.23).
This program didn't lead to a significant improvement in the patient safety incident reporting rate by professionals but seemed to sustain reporting over time. Considering that the program was fully implemented in only 41% of facilities, this highlights the difficulty of implementing such multidisciplinary programs in primary care despite its adaptation to the setting. A better understanding of how risk management is currently organized in these multiprofessional facilities is of key importance to improve patient safety in primary care.
The study has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02403388) on 30 March 2015.
虽然患者安全事件报告对初级保健中的患者安全至关重要,但医护人员的报告率仍然很低。本研究旨在评估风险管理计划在提高多专业初级保健机构报告率方面的有效性。
在法国进行了一项全国性的集群随机对照试验,每个集群定义为一个初级保健机构。干预措施包括专业的电子学习培训、确定风险管理顾问以及解决事件分析的多学科会议。在第一个观察期内,所有机构都实施了专业人员的患者安全事件报告系统。然后,设施被随机分组并实施该计划。在 15 个月的研究期间报告了事件。使用拟泊松模型比较报告率。
35 家机构(干预组 n=17;对照组 n=18)纳入研究,分别有 169 名和 232 名医疗保健专业人员参与。总体而言,17 家机构中有 7 家完成了整个计划(41.2%),6 家没有召开会议(35.3%);48.5%的专业人员登录了电子学习网站。报告的事件相对比率为 2.7(95%CI[0.84-11.0];p=0.12)。然而,对照组在干预前和干预后期间的事件发生率呈统计学显著下降(HR=0.2;95%CI[0.05-0.54];p=0.02),而干预组则没有(HR=0.54;95%CI[0.2-1.54];p=0.23)。
该计划并没有显著提高专业人员报告患者安全事件的比率,但似乎随着时间的推移报告率有所维持。考虑到该计划仅在 41%的机构中得到全面实施,这突显了尽管该计划适应了初级保健环境,但在初级保健中实施这种多学科计划仍然存在困难。更好地了解这些多专业机构目前如何组织风险管理对于提高初级保健中的患者安全至关重要。
该研究于 2015 年 3 月 30 日在 clinicaltrials.gov 注册(NCT02403388)。