Department of Neurological Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2010 Dec;74(6):617-26. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.05.038.
The management of neurogenic intermittent claudication encompasses myriad modalities, with the use of Interlaminar spacer being among the newer ones.
A review of work-to-date on Interlaminar spacer is presented, which was first introduced in November 2005. A multitude of both clinical and radiographic studies among both orthopedists and neurosurgeons embracing its ease of insertion, decreased operative duration and morbidity, and often same-day hospital discharge while obtaining therapeutic benefits seemingly comparable to more traditional decompressive techniques is discussed. It acts via modification of the normal relationships between both soft and hard tissues, and some initial studies have reported patient satisfaction exceeding 70%.
This review will allow the clinician to better understand Interlaminar spacer's indications in the context of current literature and, moreover, help one determine when its insertion is most likely to produce symptom relief. Although never directly compared against traditional decompression, there is evidence based on standard outcome reporting instruments that it can offer therapeutic efficacy at least comparable to its proven operative predecessors. More recent work examining its long-term patient outcomes has begun to reveal its shortcomings as well as the urgency of further studying its efficacy. Clinicians should consider its insertion with cautious enthusiasm, especially considering some of its recently published poor patient outcomes and the newer interspinous devices on the horizon.
神经源性间歇性跛行的治疗方法有很多种,使用椎间间隔物就是其中较新的一种。
本文对椎间间隔物的研究进展进行了综述,该研究于 2005 年 11 月首次引入。许多骨科医生和神经外科医生都进行了临床和影像学研究,认为其具有易于插入、缩短手术时间和减少发病率、通常可当天出院等优点,同时也能获得与更传统的减压技术相当的治疗效果。它通过改变软硬组织之间的正常关系来发挥作用,一些初步研究报告称患者满意度超过 70%。
本综述将使临床医生更好地了解椎间间隔物在当前文献背景下的适应证,此外,还能帮助确定其插入最有可能产生症状缓解的时机。虽然从未与传统减压术直接比较,但基于标准的结果报告工具,有证据表明它可以提供至少与已证明的手术前辈相当的治疗效果。最近开始研究其长期患者预后的工作已经开始揭示其缺点,以及进一步研究其疗效的紧迫性。临床医生应该谨慎地采用其插入方法,尤其是考虑到其最近发表的一些不良患者预后结果和即将出现的新型棘突间装置。