Suppr超能文献

华法林相关颅内出血的治疗:凝血酶原复合物浓缩物与重组活化因子 VII 的比较。

Treatment of warfarin-related intracranial hemorrhage: a comparison of prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated factor VII.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Auburn University, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2010 Dec;74(6):631-5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.06.030.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Warfarin-related intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating complication of warfarin therapy. Several studies have demonstrated successful correction of the international normalized ratio (INR) using prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) or recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). To our knowledge, no study has directly compared these agents for treatment of warfarin-related ICH.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 15 patients who received rFVIIa and 9 who received PCC for treatment of warfarin-related ICH over a 2-year period. The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of rFVIIa and PCC in correcting the INR to 1.3 or less. Baseline INR was compared to INR obtained within 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours after rFVIIa or PCC administration.

RESULTS

Six patients in the rFVIIa group and five in the PCC group had a follow-up INR within 1 hour of agent administration. In the rFVIIa group, the mean INR decreased from 6.1 to 1.1 and from 2.3 to 1.48 in the PCC group. At 6 hours, all rFVIIa patients and six (67%) PCC patients had at least one subsequent INR, with 93% and 50% correcting to an INR of 1.3 or less. Mean dose for all patients included was 53.4 ± 17.5 μg/kg and 27.8 ± 15.4 units/kg for rFVIIa and PCC, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Correction of the INR is more reliably obtained with rFVIIa when compared to PCC. Larger, prospective studies comparing these therapies for warfarin-related ICH are needed.

摘要

目的

华法林相关颅内出血(ICH)是华法林治疗的一种破坏性并发症。几项研究表明,使用凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(PCC)或重组活化因子 VII(rFVIIa)可以成功纠正国际标准化比值(INR)。据我们所知,尚无研究直接比较这些药物治疗华法林相关 ICH。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 15 例接受 rFVIIa 和 9 例接受 PCC 治疗华法林相关 ICH 的患者的病历。主要目的是比较 rFVIIa 和 PCC 在将 INR 纠正至 1.3 或更低方面的疗效。比较了基线 INR 与 rFVIIa 或 PCC 给药后 1、3、6、12 和 24 小时的 INR。

结果

rFVIIa 组 6 例和 PCC 组 5 例在给药后 1 小时内有随访 INR。rFVIIa 组的 INR 从 6.1 降至 1.1,PCC 组从 2.3 降至 1.48。在 6 小时时,所有 rFVIIa 患者和 6 名(67%)PCC 患者均有至少一次后续 INR,93%和 50%的患者 INR 降至 1.3 或更低。所有患者的平均剂量分别为 53.4 ± 17.5 μg/kg 和 27.8 ± 15.4 单位/kg,用于 rFVIIa 和 PCC。

结论

与 PCC 相比,rFVIIa 更可靠地纠正 INR。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究比较这些治疗方法在华法林相关 ICH 中的疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验