• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年度手术量对微创前列腺切除术患者住院时间的影响:基于人群的研究。

Impact of annual surgical volume on length of stay in patients undergoing minimally invasive prostatectomy: a population-based study.

机构信息

Martiniclinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 May;37(5):429-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.02.012.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2011.02.012
PMID:21492776
Abstract

BACKGROUND

On average, patients remain hospitalized no more than 2 days after MIRP. The aim of our study was to examine the temporal trends in length of stay ≥ 3 days and to test the relationship between annual surgical volume (ASV) and annual hospital volume (AHV) and length of stay ≥ 3 days in patients undergoing MIRP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Within the Florida Hospital Inpatient Datafile, 2439 men who were treated with MIRP for prostate cancer between 2005 and 2008 were identified. Temporal trends were assessed and uni and multi-variable logistic regression models tested the relationship between ASV, AHV and length of stay ≥ 3 days.

RESULTS

The average length of stay decreased from 2.4 in 2005 to 1.7 days in 2008. Length of stay ≥ 3 days was recorded in 13.6% of patients and the proportion of patients staying more than ≥ 3 days decreased over time (25.5-12.2%; Chi Square trend p < 0.001). After stratification into low (<1-15 MIRPs) vs. intermediate (16-63 MIRPs) vs. high ASV tertiles (≥ 64 MIRPs) the proportion of patients with length of stay ≥ 3 days were 29.1; 13.2 and 11.1%. In multivariable logistic regression models predicting length of stay ≥ 3 days, ASV, year of surgery and comorbidities achieved independent predictor status and MIRP patients operated by highest ASV tertile surgeons were 71% (p < 0.001) less likely to be hospitalized for more than 3 days.

CONCLUSION

The length of stay after MIRP decreased between 2005 and 2008. Surgical expertise represented one of the main determinants of shorter length of stay.

摘要

背景

MIRP 术后患者平均住院时间不超过 2 天。本研究旨在分析住院时间≥3 天的时间趋势,并检验每年手术量(ASV)和每年医院容量(AHV)与 MIRP 术后住院时间≥3 天的关系。

材料和方法

在佛罗里达医院住院患者数据文件中,确定了 2005 年至 2008 年间 2439 例接受 MIRP 治疗前列腺癌的男性患者。评估了时间趋势,并采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型检验了 ASV、AHV 与住院时间≥3 天的关系。

结果

平均住院时间从 2005 年的 2.4 天降至 2008 年的 1.7 天。有 13.6%的患者住院时间≥3 天,且住院时间≥3 天的患者比例随时间呈下降趋势(25.5-12.2%;卡方趋势 p<0.001)。分层为低(<1-15 例 MIRP)、中(16-63 例 MIRP)和高 ASV 三分位数(≥64 例 MIRP)后,住院时间≥3 天的患者比例分别为 29.1%、13.2%和 11.1%。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,预测住院时间≥3 天的因素有 ASV、手术年份和合并症,ASV 成为独立预测因素,接受最高 ASV 三分位数外科医生手术的 MIRP 患者住院时间超过 3 天的可能性降低 71%(p<0.001)。

结论

MIRP 术后住院时间在 2005 年至 2008 年间呈下降趋势。手术经验是缩短住院时间的主要决定因素之一。

相似文献

1
Impact of annual surgical volume on length of stay in patients undergoing minimally invasive prostatectomy: a population-based study.年度手术量对微创前列腺切除术患者住院时间的影响:基于人群的研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 May;37(5):429-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.02.012.
2
Impact of surgical experience on in-hospital complication rates in patients undergoing minimally invasive prostatectomy: a population-based study.手术经验对微创前列腺切除术患者住院并发症发生率的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Mar;18(3):839-47. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1300-0. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
3
The impact of surgical experience on total hospital charges for minimally invasive prostatectomy: a population-based study.手术经验对微创前列腺切除术总住院费用的影响:基于人群的研究。
BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6):888-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09906.x. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
4
The effect of minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy surgeon volume.微创和开放根治性前列腺切除术医师手术量的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2012 Sep;30(5):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Sep 6.
5
A population-based analysis of temporal perioperative complication rates after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.基于人群的微创根治性前列腺切除术围手术期时间相关并发症发生率的分析。
Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):564-71. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.036. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
6
Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.2003年至2005年美国根治性前列腺切除术的护理模式。
J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):1969-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.054. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
7
Annual prostatectomy volume is related to rectal laceration rate after radical prostatectomy.前列腺切除术的年手术量与根治性前列腺切除术后直肠裂伤的发生率有关。
Urology. 2012 Apr;79(4):796-803. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.061.
8
Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.微创根治性前列腺切除术的应用与疗效
J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 10;26(14):2278-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4528.
9
Radical prostatectomy practice in England.英国的根治性前列腺切除术实践
Urol J. 2010 Fall;7(4):243-8.
10
In-hospital mortality and morbidity after surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 1996-2000: the effect of hospital and surgeon volume.1996 - 2000年美国未破裂颅内动脉瘤手术治疗后的院内死亡率和发病率:医院及外科医生手术量的影响
Neurosurgery. 2003 May;52(5):995-1007; discussion 1007-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Surgery and Surgical Volume-Specific Survival and Perioperative Outcome: Unmet Need for Evidence in Gynecologic Malignancy.微创手术与手术量特定的生存率及围手术期结局:妇科恶性肿瘤领域证据的未满足需求
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):4787. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204787.
2
Does Surgical Volume Influence the Need for Second Surgery? A Pilot Study.手术量会影响二次手术的需求吗?一项初步研究。
OTO Open. 2017 Aug 24;1(3):2473974X17728257. doi: 10.1177/2473974X17728257. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
3
A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy.
根治性前列腺切除术的手术量与治疗效果关系的系统评价
Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):786-98. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 Apr 19.