Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jul;213(1):19-26; discussion 26-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.03.014. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
Outcomes of surgical resident training are under scrutiny with the changing milieu of surgical education. Few have investigated the effect of surgical resident involvement (SRI) on operative parameters. Examining 7 common general surgery procedures, we evaluated the effect of SRI on perioperative morbidity and mortality and operative time (OpT).
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005 to 2007) was used to identify 7 cases of nonemergent operations. Cases with simultaneous procedures were excluded. Logistic regression was performed across all procedures and within each procedure incorporating SRI, OpT, and risk-stratifying American College of Surgery National Surgical Quality Improvement Program morbidity and mortality probability scores, which incorporate multiple prognostic individual patient factors. Procedure-specific, SRI-stratified OpTs were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.
A total of 71.3% of the 37,907 cases had SRI. Absolute 30-day morbidity for all cases with SRI and without SRI were 3.0% and 1.0%, respectively (p < 0.001); absolute 30-day mortality for all cases with SRI and without SRI were 0.1% and 0.08%, respectively (p < 0.001). After multivariate analysis by specific procedure, SRI was not associated with increased morbidity but was associated with decreased mortality during open right colectomy (odds ratio 0.32; p = 0.01). Across all procedures, SRI was associated with increased morbidity (odds ratio 1.14; p = 0.048) but decreased mortality (odds ratio 0.42; p < 0.001). Mean OpT for all procedures was consistently lower for cases without SRI.
SRI has a measurable impact on both 30-day morbidity and mortality and OpT. These data have implications to the impact associated with surgical graduate medical education. Further studies to identify causes of patient morbidity and prevention strategies in surgical teaching environments are warranted.
随着外科教育环境的变化,外科住院医师培训的结果受到了审查。很少有人研究外科住院医师参与(SRI)对手术参数的影响。我们检查了 7 种常见的普通外科手术,评估了 SRI 对围手术期发病率和死亡率以及手术时间(OpT)的影响。
使用美国外科医师学院国家外科质量改进计划数据库(2005 年至 2007 年)确定了 7 例非紧急手术。排除同时进行的手术。对所有手术和每个手术进行了逻辑回归,纳入了 SRI、OpT 和风险分层的美国外科医师学院国家外科质量改进计划发病率和死亡率概率评分,该评分纳入了多个预后个体患者因素。使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较了特定于程序的 SRI 分层 OpT。
共有 71.3%的 37907 例手术有 SRI。所有有 SRI 和无 SRI 的病例的 30 天绝对发病率分别为 3.0%和 1.0%(p<0.001);所有有 SRI 和无 SRI 的病例的 30 天绝对死亡率分别为 0.1%和 0.08%(p<0.001)。通过特定程序的多变量分析,SRI 与发病率增加无关,但与开放右结肠切除术的死亡率降低相关(比值比 0.32;p=0.01)。在所有手术中,SRI 与发病率增加相关(比值比 1.14;p=0.048),但与死亡率降低相关(比值比 0.42;p<0.001)。所有手术中,无 SRI 的病例的平均 OpT 始终较低。
SRI 对 30 天发病率和死亡率以及 OpT 有可衡量的影响。这些数据对外科研究生医学教育相关的影响具有意义。需要进一步研究以确定外科教学环境中患者发病率的原因和预防策略。