• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实用调查与问卷指南。

A practical guide to surveys and questionnaires.

机构信息

Practical Guides Writing Group, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;144(6):831-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599811399724. Epub 2011 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1177/0194599811399724
PMID:21493322
Abstract

Surveys with questionnaires play a vital role in decision and policy making in society. Within medicine, including otolaryngology, surveys with questionnaires may be the only method for gathering data on rare or unusual events. In addition, questionnaires can be developed and validated to be used as outcome measures in clinical trials and other clinical research architecture. Consequently, it is fundamentally important that such tools be properly developed and validated. Just asking questions that have not gone through rigorous design and development may be misleading and unfair at best; at worst, they can result in under- or overtreatment and unnecessary expense. Furthermore, it is important that consumers of the data produced by these instruments understand the principles of questionnaire design to interpret results in an optimal and meaningful way. This article presents a practical guide for understanding the methodologies of survey and questionnaire design, including the concepts of validity and reliability, how surveys are administered and implemented, and, finally, biases and pitfalls of surveys.

摘要

问卷调查在社会决策和政策制定中起着至关重要的作用。在医学领域,包括耳鼻喉科,问卷调查可能是收集罕见或不常见事件数据的唯一方法。此外,还可以开发和验证问卷,将其用作临床试验和其他临床研究设计中的结局测量指标。因此,正确开发和验证这些工具至关重要。充其量,只是提出未经严格设计和开发的问题可能会产生误导和不公平;最坏的情况是,它们可能导致治疗不足或过度治疗以及不必要的费用。此外,重要的是,这些工具产生的数据的使用者理解问卷设计的原则,以便以最佳和有意义的方式解释结果。本文提供了一个实用指南,用于了解调查和问卷设计的方法学,包括有效性和可靠性的概念、调查的管理和实施方式,以及调查的偏差和陷阱。

相似文献

1
A practical guide to surveys and questionnaires.实用调查与问卷指南。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;144(6):831-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599811399724. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
2
Essential elements of questionnaire design and development.问卷设计与开发的基本要素。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Feb;16(2):234-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x.
3
Epilogue: Early lessons from CAHPS Demonstrations and Evaluations. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.结语:CAHPS示范与评估的早期经验教训。健康计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS97-105.
4
Using hospital surveys to enhance the quality of care.
DRG Monit. 1989 Nov;7(3):1-8.
5
Principles of survey development for telemedicine applications.远程医疗应用的调查开发原则。
J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(3):111-5. doi: 10.1258/135763306776738549.
6
The design and assessment of questionnaires in clinical research.临床研究中问卷的设计与评估。
Singapore Med J. 2001 Mar;42(3):131-5.
7
Methodological studies of orofacial aesthetics, orofacial function and oral health-related quality of life.口腔面部美学、口腔面部功能及口腔健康相关生活质量的方法学研究。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2010(204):11-98.
8
Use of treatment guidelines in clinical decision making in bipolar disorder: a pilot survey of clinicians.双相情感障碍临床决策中治疗指南的应用:临床医生的初步调查
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Mar;23(3):467-75. doi: 10.1185/030079906X167444.
9
Appraisal of primary outcome measures used in trials of patient decision support.患者决策支持试验中使用的主要结局指标评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.011. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
10
Cognitive laboratory approach to designing questionnaires for surveys of the elderly.用于设计老年人调查问卷的认知实验室方法。
Public Health Rep. 1990 Sep-Oct;105(5):518-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the role of social media in mathematics learning: effects on self-efficacy, interest, and self-regulation.探索社交媒体在数学学习中的作用:对自我效能感、兴趣和自我调节的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 25;13(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03192-z.
2
The Refractive Cataract Surgery Survey (RCSS): A Validated Questionnaire for Quick Clinical Use.屈光性白内障手术调查(RCSS):一种经过验证的可快速用于临床的问卷。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 2;19:1191-1202. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S515694. eCollection 2025.
3
SCAI Manual of Standard Operating Procedures for Performing Scientific Surveys.
SCAI科学调查标准操作程序手册。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Feb 7;3(3Part A):101287. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101287. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Awareness of Child Abuse and Neglect: A Prospective Interventional Study among Schoolteachers from Andhra Pradesh.对虐待和忽视儿童问题的认知:一项针对安得拉邦教师的前瞻性干预研究。
Pediatr Rep. 2024 Feb 27;16(1):163-173. doi: 10.3390/pediatric16010015.
5
Evaluation and associated factors of public health emergency management among medical college students in a city in Southwest China: a cross-sectional study.中国西南某市医学生突发公共卫生事件管理评价及影响因素分析:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 20;24(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05317-1.
6
Patient Experience and Preferences for the Assessment of Olfaction: The Patient International Clinical Assessment of Smell Survey.患者对嗅觉评估的体验和偏好:患者国际嗅觉临床评估调查。
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2024;86(1):16-31. doi: 10.1159/000535794. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
7
Reported Effects of Noncompete Clauses on Practitioners in Applied Behavior Analysis.竞业禁止条款对应用行为分析从业者的 reported 影响。 (注:这里“reported”不太明确准确意思,结合语境可能是“报告的”之类意思,整体译文可能稍显生硬,需结合更多上下文准确理解)
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 May 31;16(1):251-264. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00718-4. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Interprofessional survey on medication reconciliation activities in the US Department of Veterans' Affairs: development and validation of an Implementation Readiness Questionnaire.美国退伍军人事务部药物重整活动的跨专业调查:实施准备情况调查问卷的制定和验证。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Oct;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001750.
9
How short or long should be a questionnaire for any research? Researchers dilemma in deciding the appropriate questionnaire length.对于任何研究而言,一份调查问卷应该多长或多短?研究人员在确定合适的问卷长度时面临的困境。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2022 Jan-Mar;16(1):65-68. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_163_21. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
10
Complexity of Drug Substitutions Caused by Drug Tenders: A Mixed-Methods Study in Denmark.药品招标导致的药物替代复杂性:丹麦的一项混合方法研究
Hosp Pharm. 2021 Aug;56(4):314-320. doi: 10.1177/0018578719894980. Epub 2019 Dec 21.