• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用冷干空气激发和鼻声反射测量诊断非特异性高反应性的标准。

Diagnostic criteria of nonspecific hyperreactivity using cold dry air provocation with acoustic rhinometry.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jan;144(1):91-5. doi: 10.1177/0194599810390886.

DOI:10.1177/0194599810390886
PMID:21493394
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors aimed to (1) compare symptom changes in patients with or without nonspecific hyperreactivity, (2) compare changes in total nasal volume (TNV) and minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) using acoustic rhinometry after cold dry air (CDA) challenge, and (3) set the diagnostic criteria using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective pilot.

SETTING

Academic tertiary rhinologic practice.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

CDA provocation was performed on 45 patients with self-reported hypersensitivity to cold dry air (group A) and to 53 patients without such hypersensitivity (group B). Symptoms (as measured by visual analog scale [VAS]), TNV, and MCA were checked before and after provocation.

RESULTS

The changes in nasal obstruction (1.8 ± 2.1 vs 0.0 ± 2.3) and rhinorrhea (0.8 ± 2.1 vs -0.5 ± 2.3) were significantly greater in group A (P < .01 in each case). There were no significant differences between groups in VAS scores for sneezing and itching. From the ROC curve, the authors set the diagnostic criterion as "TNSS (total nasal symptom score) change larger than 1.5," and its sensitivity and specificity were 75.6% and 86.8%, respectively. The criteria "TNV decrease larger than 19.5%" and "MCA change larger than 15.0%" had higher sensitivity and specificity (TNV: 84.4% sensitivity and 77.4% specificity; MCA: 93.3% sensitivity and 77.4% specificity).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors were able to propose diagnostic criteria of nonspecific hyperreactivity using a CDA provocation test with acoustic rhinometry. These results are also helpful for understanding the pathophysiologic mechanisms of nonspecific hyperreactivity.

摘要

目的

作者旨在:(1)比较具有或不具有非特异性高反应性的患者的症状变化,(2)比较冷干空气(CDA)激发后使用声鼻反射测量法的总鼻体积(TNV)和最小横截面积(MCA)的变化,(3)使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来设定诊断标准。

研究设计

前瞻性试点研究。

设置

学术性三级鼻科实践。

受试者和方法

对 45 名自述对冷干空气过敏的患者(A 组)和 53 名无此类过敏的患者(B 组)进行 CDA 激发。在激发前后检查症状(用视觉模拟量表[VAS]测量)、TNV 和 MCA。

结果

A 组鼻塞(1.8±2.1 对 0.0±2.3)和流涕(0.8±2.1 对-0.5±2.3)的变化明显更大(在每种情况下 P<.01)。两组患者打喷嚏和瘙痒的 VAS 评分无显著差异。从 ROC 曲线中,作者将诊断标准设定为“TNSS(总鼻症状评分)变化大于 1.5”,其敏感性和特异性分别为 75.6%和 86.8%。标准“TNV 减少大于 19.5%”和“MCA 变化大于 15.0%”具有更高的敏感性和特异性(TNV:84.4%的敏感性和 77.4%的特异性;MCA:93.3%的敏感性和 77.4%的特异性)。

结论

作者能够使用声鼻反射测量法的 CDA 激发试验提出非特异性高反应性的诊断标准。这些结果也有助于了解非特异性高反应性的病理生理机制。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic criteria of nonspecific hyperreactivity using cold dry air provocation with acoustic rhinometry.使用冷干空气激发和鼻声反射测量诊断非特异性高反应性的标准。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jan;144(1):91-5. doi: 10.1177/0194599810390886.
2
Use of cold dry air provocation with acoustic rhinometry in detecting nonspecific nasal hyperreactivity.冷干空气激发联合声鼻反射测量术用于检测非特异性鼻高反应性。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010 Jul-Aug;24(4):260-2. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3488.
3
Nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea reflect nonspecific nasal hyper-reactivity as evaluated by cold dry air provocation.鼻塞和流涕反映了通过冷干空气激发试验评估的非特异性鼻高反应性。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2012 Oct;132(10):1095-101. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2012.681798. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
4
Subjective cold hyper-responsiveness grade reflects age- and duration-related increase of nonspecific nasal hyperreactivity.主观冷超敏反应分级反映了与年龄和病程相关的非特异性鼻高反应性增加。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2013 Apr;40(2):184-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
5
Cold dry air provocation is a reliable diagnostic tool in nonallergic rhinitis.冷干空气激发是变应性鼻炎以外的可靠诊断工具。
Rhinology. 2019 Jun 1;57(3):225-230. doi: 10.4193/Rhin18.187.
6
Usefulness of the subjective cold hyperresponsiveness scale as evaluated by cold dry air provocation.冷干空气激发试验评估主观冷超敏反应量表的效用。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012 Jan-Feb;26(1):45-8. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3694.
7
Short-time cold dry air exposure: a useful diagnostic tool for nasal hyperresponsiveness.短时间冷干空气暴露:鼻高反应性的有用诊断工具。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Dec;122(12):2615-20. doi: 10.1002/lary.23495. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
8
Comparison of optical rhinometry to acoustic rhinometry using nasal provocation testing with Dermatophagoides farinae.使用粉尘螨进行鼻腔激发试验,比较光学鼻测量法与声学鼻测量法。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Aug;143(2):290-3. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.02.034. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
9
Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with allergic rhinitis.变应性鼻炎鼻激发试验中鼻声反射测定法的评估
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jul;139(1):120-3. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.04.028.
10
Nasal provocation test using allergen extract versus cold dry air provocation test: which and when?变应原提取液鼻激发试验与冷干空气激发试验:选用哪种,何时选用?
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013 Mar-Apr;27(2):113-7. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3870.

引用本文的文献

1
[Study on the diagnosis of idiopathic rhinitis by cold dry air provocation].[冷干空气激发试验对特发性鼻炎的诊断研究]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Aug;34(8):673-677. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.08.001.
2
Specificity and sensitivity assessment of selected nasal provocation testing techniques.所选鼻激发试验技术的特异性和敏感性评估
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2016 Dec;33(6):464-468. doi: 10.5114/pdia.2016.61339. Epub 2016 Dec 2.