Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institute, MMC, Karolinksa Institute, Berzelius Vag 3, Stockholm 17177, Sweden.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Jul;20(7):604-10. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.047035. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
Logic and experience suggest that it is easier in some situations than in others to change behaviour and organisation to improve patient safety. Knowing which 'context factors' help and hinder implementation of different changes would help implementers, as well as managers, policy makers, regulators and purchasers of healthcare. It could help to judge the likely success of possible improvements, given the conditions that they have, and to decide which of these conditions could be modified to make implementation more effective.
The study presented in this paper examined research to discover any evidence reported about whether or how context factors influence the effectiveness of five patient safety interventions.
The review found that, for these five diverse interventions, there was little strong evidence of the influence of different context factors. However, the research was not designed to investigate context influence.
The paper suggests that significant gaps in research exist and makes proposals for future research better to inform decision-making.
逻辑和经验表明,在某些情况下,改变行为和组织以提高患者安全性比在其他情况下更容易。了解哪些“背景因素”有助于或阻碍不同变革的实施将有助于实施者,以及管理人员、政策制定者、监管者和医疗保健购买者。考虑到他们所处的条件,可以帮助判断可能改进的成功可能性,并决定可以修改哪些条件以使实施更有效。
本文介绍的研究检查了旨在发现任何有关背景因素是否影响或如何影响五项患者安全干预措施有效性的报告证据的研究。
审查发现,对于这五项不同的干预措施,几乎没有强有力的证据表明不同背景因素的影响。然而,该研究并非旨在调查背景影响。
本文提出,研究中存在重大差距,并为未来的研究提出建议,以便更好地为决策提供信息。