• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于影响肺癌筛查依从性的背景因素的混合方法环境扫描的研究方案。

A study protocol for a mixed-method environmental scan of contextual factors that influence lung cancer screening adherence.

作者信息

Hirsch Erin A, Fathi Joelle, Ciupek Andrew, Carter-Bawa Lisa

机构信息

Center for Discovery & Innovation at Hackensack Meridian Health, Cancer Prevention Precision Control Institute, 111 Ideation Way, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA.

GO2 for Lung Cancer, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Nov 6;5(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00658-w.

DOI:10.1186/s43058-024-00658-w
PMID:39506762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11539639/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of lung cancer screening (LCS) to reduce lung cancer specific mortality is heavily dependent on adherence to recommended screening guidelines, with real-world adherence rates reported to be drastically lower than rates described in clinical trials. There is a dearth in the literature on reminder processes and clinical workflows used to address adherence and robust data is needed to fully understand which clinical set-ups, processes, and context enhance and increase continued LCS participation. This paper describes a protocol for an environmental scan of adherence and reminder processes that are currently used in LCS programs across the United States.

METHODS

This study will triangulate data using a 3-step explanatory sequential mixed methods design to describe mechanisms of current adherence and reminder systems within academic and community LCS programs to pinpoint clinic or system barrier and facilitator combinations that contribute to increased adherence. In step 1, surveys from a nationally representative sample of LCS programs will yield quantitative data about program structure, volume, and tracking/reminder processes and messages. After completion of the survey, interested LCS program personnel will be invited to participate in an in-depth interview (step 2) to explore current processes and interventions used for adherence at the participant and program level. Finally, in step 3, triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data will be completed through qualitative comparative analysis to identify combinations of components that affect higher or lower adherence.

DISCUSSION

This research advances the state of the science by filling a gap in knowledge about LCS program characteristics and processes associated with better adherence which can inform the development and implementation of interventions that are scalable and sustainable across a wide variety of clinical practice settings.

摘要

背景

肺癌筛查(LCS)降低肺癌特异性死亡率的疗效在很大程度上取决于对推荐筛查指南的遵守情况,据报道,实际世界中的遵守率远低于临床试验中描述的比率。关于用于解决遵守问题的提醒流程和临床工作流程的文献匮乏,需要强有力的数据来全面了解哪些临床设置、流程和背景能增强并提高持续参与肺癌筛查的比例。本文描述了一项对美国各地肺癌筛查项目中目前使用的遵守和提醒流程进行环境扫描的方案。

方法

本研究将采用三步解释性序列混合方法设计对数据进行三角测量,以描述学术和社区肺癌筛查项目中当前遵守和提醒系统的机制,从而确定有助于提高遵守率的诊所或系统障碍及促进因素组合。在第一步中,来自具有全国代表性的肺癌筛查项目样本的调查将产生关于项目结构、数量以及跟踪/提醒流程和信息的定量数据。在调查完成后,感兴趣的肺癌筛查项目人员将被邀请参与深入访谈(第二步),以探索在参与者和项目层面用于提高遵守率的当前流程和干预措施。最后,在第三步中,将通过定性比较分析完成定量和定性数据的三角测量,以确定影响遵守率高低的各组成部分的组合。

讨论

本研究通过填补关于肺癌筛查项目特征以及与更好遵守相关的流程方面的知识空白,推动了科学发展,这可为在各种临床实践环境中可扩展且可持续的干预措施的开发和实施提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0433/11539639/c20f85570050/43058_2024_658_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0433/11539639/c20f85570050/43058_2024_658_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0433/11539639/c20f85570050/43058_2024_658_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A study protocol for a mixed-method environmental scan of contextual factors that influence lung cancer screening adherence.一项关于影响肺癌筛查依从性的背景因素的混合方法环境扫描的研究方案。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Nov 6;5(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00658-w.
2
Using User-Centered Design to Facilitate Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study for Intervention Development.运用以用户为中心的设计促进年度肺癌筛查的依从性:干预开发混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Apr 14;12:e46657. doi: 10.2196/46657.
3
A pragmatic randomized clinical trial of multilevel interventions to improve adherence to lung cancer screening (The Larch Study): Study protocol.一项旨在提高肺癌筛查依从性的多层面干预实用随机临床试验(落叶松研究):研究方案
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 May;140:107495. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107495. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
4
5
Barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening and follow-up.肺癌筛查与随访的障碍及促进因素
Semin Oncol. 2022 Jun;49(3-4):213-219. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
6
Accelerating integration of tobacco use treatment in the context of lung cancer screening: Relevance and application of implementation science to achieving policy and practice.加速肺癌筛查背景下的烟草使用治疗整合:实施科学在实现政策和实践方面的相关性和应用。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Nov 21;12(11):1076-1083. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac076.
7
Real-world Clinical Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening-Evaluating Processes to Improve Screening Guidelines-Concordance.肺癌筛查的真实世界临床实施——评估改善筛查指南一致性的流程
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1143-1152. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05539-w. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
8
Patient Identification of Lung Cancer Screening Follow-Up Recommendations and the Association with Adherence.肺癌筛查随访建议的患者识别及其与依从性的关联。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 May;19(5):799-806. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202107-887OC.
9
Racial Differences in Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening Follow-up: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肺癌筛查随访依从性的种族差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):266-275. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.2172. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
10
Adherence to Follow-up Testing Recommendations in US Veterans Screened for Lung Cancer, 2015-2019.2015-2019 年美国肺癌筛查退伍军人的随访检测建议依从性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116233. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16233.

引用本文的文献

1
RADAR-ES: A Methodological Framework for Conducting Environmental Scans in Health Services Delivery Research.RADAR-ES:卫生服务提供研究中进行环境扫描的方法框架。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251363783. doi: 10.1177/21501319251363783. Epub 2025 Aug 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services.迈向实施利益相关者参与模型(I-STEM),以改善医疗保健服务。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1997-2012. doi: 10.1111/hex.13808. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
2
Education messages and strategies to inform the public, potential screening candidates and healthcare providers about lung cancer screening: A systematic review.教育信息和策略,以告知公众、潜在筛查对象和医疗保健提供者有关肺癌筛查的信息:系统评价。
Prev Med. 2023 Apr;169:107459. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107459. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
3
Outcomes From More Than 1 Million People Screened for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose CT Imaging.
超过 100 万人接受低剂量 CT 成像筛查肺癌的结果。
Chest. 2023 Jul;164(1):241-251. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
4
Receipt of Recommended Follow-up Care After a Positive Lung Cancer Screening Examination.肺癌筛查检查呈阳性后的推荐随访护理的接受情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2240403. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.40403.
5
Identifying Priorities and Strategies for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Tribal Clinics.确定部落诊所改善结直肠癌筛查的优先事项和策略。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221132516. doi: 10.1177/10732748221132516.
6
Impact of low health literacy on patients' health outcomes: a multicenter cohort study.低健康素养对患者健康结局的影响:一项多中心队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 12;22(1):1148. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08527-9.
7
Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening: A Framework-Driven Systematic Review.肺癌筛查实施的促进因素和障碍:基于框架的系统综述。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Nov 14;114(11):1449-1467. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac154.
8
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
9
Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review.利用环境扫描在卫生服务提供研究中的应用:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 10;11(11):e050284. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050284.
10
Patient Adherence to Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System-Recommended Screening Intervals in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.美国患者对肺部 CT 筛查报告和数据系统推荐筛查间隔的依从性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thorac Oncol. 2022 Jan;17(1):38-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Oct 6.