文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

A study protocol for a mixed-method environmental scan of contextual factors that influence lung cancer screening adherence.

作者信息

Hirsch Erin A, Fathi Joelle, Ciupek Andrew, Carter-Bawa Lisa

机构信息

Center for Discovery & Innovation at Hackensack Meridian Health, Cancer Prevention Precision Control Institute, 111 Ideation Way, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA.

GO2 for Lung Cancer, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Nov 6;5(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00658-w.


DOI:10.1186/s43058-024-00658-w
PMID:39506762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11539639/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of lung cancer screening (LCS) to reduce lung cancer specific mortality is heavily dependent on adherence to recommended screening guidelines, with real-world adherence rates reported to be drastically lower than rates described in clinical trials. There is a dearth in the literature on reminder processes and clinical workflows used to address adherence and robust data is needed to fully understand which clinical set-ups, processes, and context enhance and increase continued LCS participation. This paper describes a protocol for an environmental scan of adherence and reminder processes that are currently used in LCS programs across the United States. METHODS: This study will triangulate data using a 3-step explanatory sequential mixed methods design to describe mechanisms of current adherence and reminder systems within academic and community LCS programs to pinpoint clinic or system barrier and facilitator combinations that contribute to increased adherence. In step 1, surveys from a nationally representative sample of LCS programs will yield quantitative data about program structure, volume, and tracking/reminder processes and messages. After completion of the survey, interested LCS program personnel will be invited to participate in an in-depth interview (step 2) to explore current processes and interventions used for adherence at the participant and program level. Finally, in step 3, triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data will be completed through qualitative comparative analysis to identify combinations of components that affect higher or lower adherence. DISCUSSION: This research advances the state of the science by filling a gap in knowledge about LCS program characteristics and processes associated with better adherence which can inform the development and implementation of interventions that are scalable and sustainable across a wide variety of clinical practice settings.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0433/11539639/c20f85570050/43058_2024_658_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0433/11539639/c20f85570050/43058_2024_658_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0433/11539639/c20f85570050/43058_2024_658_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
A study protocol for a mixed-method environmental scan of contextual factors that influence lung cancer screening adherence.

Implement Sci Commun. 2024-11-6

[2]
Using User-Centered Design to Facilitate Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study for Intervention Development.

JMIR Res Protoc. 2023-4-14

[3]
A pragmatic randomized clinical trial of multilevel interventions to improve adherence to lung cancer screening (The Larch Study): Study protocol.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2024-5

[4]

2015-7

[5]
Barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening and follow-up.

Semin Oncol. 2022-6

[6]
Accelerating integration of tobacco use treatment in the context of lung cancer screening: Relevance and application of implementation science to achieving policy and practice.

Transl Behav Med. 2022-11-21

[7]
Real-world Clinical Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening-Evaluating Processes to Improve Screening Guidelines-Concordance.

J Gen Intern Med. 2020-4

[8]
Patient Identification of Lung Cancer Screening Follow-Up Recommendations and the Association with Adherence.

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022-5

[9]
Racial Differences in Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening Follow-up: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Chest. 2022-1

[10]
Adherence to Follow-up Testing Recommendations in US Veterans Screened for Lung Cancer, 2015-2019.

JAMA Netw Open. 2021-7-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
RADAR-ES: A Methodological Framework for Conducting Environmental Scans in Health Services Delivery Research.

J Prim Care Community Health. 2025

本文引用的文献

[1]
Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services.

Health Expect. 2023-10

[2]
Education messages and strategies to inform the public, potential screening candidates and healthcare providers about lung cancer screening: A systematic review.

Prev Med. 2023-4

[3]
Outcomes From More Than 1 Million People Screened for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose CT Imaging.

Chest. 2023-7

[4]
Receipt of Recommended Follow-up Care After a Positive Lung Cancer Screening Examination.

JAMA Netw Open. 2022-11-1

[5]
Identifying Priorities and Strategies for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Tribal Clinics.

Cancer Control. 2022

[6]
Impact of low health literacy on patients' health outcomes: a multicenter cohort study.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022-9-12

[7]
Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening: A Framework-Driven Systematic Review.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022-11-14

[8]
Cancer statistics, 2022.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2022-1

[9]
Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review.

BMJ Open. 2021-11-10

[10]
Patient Adherence to Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System-Recommended Screening Intervals in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

J Thorac Oncol. 2022-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索