• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质疑量化指令:决策辅助、预防和披露伦理。

Questioning the quantitative imperative: decision aids, prevention, and the ethics of disclosure.

机构信息

Indiana University Center for Bioethics, USA.

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2011 Mar-Apr;41(2):30-9. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0029.

DOI:10.1353/hcr.2011.0029
PMID:21495515
Abstract

Patients should not always receive hard data about the risks and benefits of a medical intervention. That information should always be available to patients who expressly ask for it, but it should be part of standard disclosure only sometimes, and only for some patients. And even then, we need to think about how to offer it.

摘要

患者不应该总是接收到关于医疗干预的风险和益处的硬数据。如果患者明确要求,这些信息应该始终向他们提供,但它只应在某些情况下作为标准披露的一部分,并且只针对某些患者。即使在这种情况下,我们也需要考虑如何提供它。

相似文献

1
Questioning the quantitative imperative: decision aids, prevention, and the ethics of disclosure.质疑量化指令:决策辅助、预防和披露伦理。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2011 Mar-Apr;41(2):30-9. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2011.0029.
2
Too much information?信息太多了?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2012 Jan-Feb;42(1):6-7; author reply 7-8.
3
Too much information?信息太多了?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2012 Jan-Feb;42(1):5-6; author reply 7-8.
4
Too much information?信息太多了?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2012 Jan-Feb;42(1):4-5; author reply 7-8.
5
Too much information?信息太多了?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2012 Jan-Feb;42(1):4; author reply 7-8.
6
Government-scripted consent: when medical ethics and law collide.政府拟定的同意书:当医学伦理与法律发生冲突时
Hastings Cent Rep. 2009 Sep-Oct;39(5):21-3. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0181.
7
Disclosure of individualized research results: a precautionary approach.个体化研究结果的披露:一种预防措施。
Account Res. 2011 Nov;18(6):382-97. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2011.622172.
8
Transparency and self-censorship in shared decision-making.共同决策中的透明度与自我审查。
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jul;7(7):44-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160701399800.
9
Who shall decide: telling the truth and avoiding the law--patient consent in the millennium.谁来做决定:讲真话与规避法律——千禧年的患者同意问题
J Prim Health Care. 2009 Dec;1(4):326-8.
10
Silence about screening.关于筛查保持沉默。
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jul;7(7):46-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160701399818.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring the Impact of Quantitative Information on Patient Understanding: Approaches for Assessing the Adequacy of Patient Knowledge about Colorectal Cancer Screening.衡量定量信息对患者理解的影响:评估患者对结直肠癌筛查知识充分性的方法
MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Nov 25;7(2):23814683221140122. doi: 10.1177/23814683221140122. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
2
Supporting Health and Medical Decision Making: Findings and Insights from Fuzzy-Trace Theory.支持健康和医疗决策:来自模糊痕迹理论的发现和见解。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Aug;42(6):741-754. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221105473. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
3
Evidence-based recommendations for communicating the impacts of climate change on health.
循证建议用于沟通气候变化对健康的影响。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 May 25;12(4):543-553. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac029.
4
Layperson Views about the Design and Evaluation of Decision Aids: A Public Deliberation.非专业人士对决策辅助工具的设计和评估的看法:公众讨论。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Jul;41(5):527-539. doi: 10.1177/0272989X21998980. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
5
Effects of Personalized Risk Information on Patients Referred for Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT.个体化风险信息对低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查患者的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Nov;39(8):950-961. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19875966. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
6
Engaging Patients in Decisions About Cancer Screening: Exploring the Decision Journey Through the Use of a Patient Portal.参与癌症筛查决策:通过使用患者门户探索决策过程。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Feb;54(2):237-247. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.027. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
7
Obstetricians and gynecologists' opinions about the Affordable Care Act and their expectations about how it will impact their practice.妇产科医生对《平价医疗法案》的看法以及他们对该法案将如何影响其执业的期望。
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Oct 26;7:216-220. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.10.013. eCollection 2017 Sep.
8
Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.决策辅助工具能否改善乳房X光检查筛查中的知情选择?一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Womens Health. 2015 Jul 22;15:53. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0210-5.
9
Presenting Numeric Information with Percentages and Descriptive Risk Labels: A Randomized Trial.使用百分比和描述性风险标签呈现数值信息:一项随机试验。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Nov;35(8):937-47. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15584922. Epub 2015 May 7.
10
Simple messages help set the record straight about scientific agreement on human-caused climate change: the results of two experiments.简单的信息有助于澄清关于人为气候变化科学共识的事实:两项实验的结果。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0120985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120985. eCollection 2015.