Suppr超能文献

个体化风险信息对低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查患者的影响。

Effects of Personalized Risk Information on Patients Referred for Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT.

机构信息

Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, ME, USA.

Chest Medicine Associates, Portland, ME, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2019 Nov;39(8):950-961. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19875966. Epub 2019 Oct 20.

Abstract

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer is a preference-sensitive intervention that should ideally be individualized according to patients' likelihood of benefit and personal values. Personalized cancer risk information (PCRI) may facilitate this goal, but its effects are unknown. To evaluate the effects of providing PCRI to patients referred for LDCT screening. Mixed-methods, pre-post study using surveys administered to patients before and after provision of PCRI-calculated by the PLCOm2012 risk prediction model-in shared decision-making consultations, and postvisit qualitative interviews. Centralized specialty-based LDCT screening program at a tertiary care hospital. Convenience sample of eligible patients referred for LDCT screening. Pre- and postvisit surveys assessed patients' 1) perceived lung cancer risk, 2) uncertainty about their risk, 3) minimum risk threshold for wanting screening, 4) interest in LDCT screening, and 5) interest in smoking cessation. Qualitative interviews explored patients' perceptions of the value of PCRI. Screening uptake was assessed by chart review. Sixty of 70 (86%) patients received PCRI and completed pre-post surveys, and 17 patients (28%) completed qualitative interviews. Perceived lung cancer risk decreased from 52% previsit to 31% postvisit ( < 0.0001). However, patients' minimum risk thresholds for screening decreased, their screening interest increased, and all patients completed screening. Qualitative interviews corroborated these effects, suggesting that patients discount and interpret PCRI according to preexisting beliefs and attitudes. The study population was a relatively small, single-institution sample of patients referred for screening. Personalized cancer risk information decreases cancer risk perceptions of patients referred for LDCT screening, but has complex effects on screening-related judgments and decisions. The value of PCRI for patients considering LDCT screening requires further investigation.

摘要

低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查肺癌是一种偏好敏感的干预措施,理想情况下应根据患者的获益可能性和个人价值观进行个体化。个性化癌症风险信息(PCRI)可能有助于实现这一目标,但效果尚不清楚。 评估为接受 LDCT 筛查的患者提供 PCRI 的效果。 采用混合方法,在提供 PCRI 前后对患者进行问卷调查,PCRI 由 PLCOm2012 风险预测模型计算,并在共同决策咨询中进行,然后进行随访定性访谈。 三级保健医院的集中专业 LDCT 筛查计划。 从接受 LDCT 筛查的合格患者中抽取方便样本。 就诊前和就诊后调查评估了患者的 1)肺癌风险感知,2)对其风险的不确定性,3)希望进行筛查的最低风险阈值,4)对 LDCT 筛查的兴趣,以及 5)对戒烟的兴趣。定性访谈探讨了患者对 PCRI 价值的看法。通过病历审查评估筛查参与度。 70 名患者中的 60 名(86%)接受了 PCRI 并完成了就诊前和就诊后调查,17 名患者(28%)完成了定性访谈。就诊前的肺癌风险感知从 52%下降到就诊后的 31%(<0.0001)。然而,患者的最低筛查风险阈值降低,他们的筛查兴趣增加,所有患者都完成了筛查。定性访谈证实了这些影响,表明患者根据预先存在的信念和态度来贴现和解释 PCRI。 研究人群是一个相对较小的、单一机构的筛查患者样本。 个性化癌症风险信息降低了接受 LDCT 筛查的患者的癌症风险感知,但对与筛查相关的判断和决策有复杂的影响。考虑进行 LDCT 筛查的患者对 PCRI 的价值需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Effects of Personalized Risk Information on Patients Referred for Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT.
Med Decis Making. 2019 Nov;39(8):950-961. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19875966. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
2
Primary Care Provider and Patient Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. A Qualitative Study.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Nov;13(11):1977-1982. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-286OC.
4
Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Practices and Attitudes among Primary Care Providers at an Academic Medical Center.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Apr;24(4):664-70. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1241. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
7
Barriers to Completing Low Dose Computed Tomography Scan for Lung Cancer Screening.
Clin Lung Cancer. 2024 Jul;25(5):424-430. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.04.014. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
9
A pre-post study testing a lung cancer screening decision aid in primary care.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jan 12;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0582-1.
10
Attitudes About Lung Cancer Screening: Primary Care Providers Versus Specialists.
Clin Lung Cancer. 2017 Nov;18(6):e417-e423. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing the Design of and Emerging Evidence for Health Care Organization-Based Lung Cancer Screening Interventions: A Systematic Review.
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Apr 25;10(1):23814683251328375. doi: 10.1177/23814683251328375. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
5
Personalised lung cancer risk stratification and lung cancer screening: do general practice electronic medical records have a role?
Br J Cancer. 2023 Dec;129(12):1968-1977. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02467-9. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
6
Testing Explanations for Skepticism of Personalized Risk Information.
Med Decis Making. 2023 May;43(4):430-444. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231162824. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
7
Interventions Designed to Increase the Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: An Equity-Oriented Scoping Review.
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2023 Feb 2;4(3):100469. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100469. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Lung cancer screening: targeting the hard to reach-a review.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 May;10(5):2309-2322. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-525.

本文引用的文献

1
Selecting lung cancer screenees using risk prediction models-where do we go from here.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018 Jun;7(3):243-253. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.06.03.
2
A bias for action in cancer screening?
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019 Jun;25(2):149-161. doi: 10.1037/xap0000177. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
3
A qualitative study exploring patient motivations for screening for lung cancer.
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 5;13(7):e0196758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196758. eCollection 2018.
4
Identifying Patients for Whom Lung Cancer Screening Is Preference-Sensitive: A Microsimulation Study.
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jul 3;169(1):1-9. doi: 10.7326/M17-2561. Epub 2018 May 29.
5
Implications of Nine Risk Prediction Models for Selecting Ever-Smokers for Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening.
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jul 3;169(1):10-19. doi: 10.7326/M17-2701. Epub 2018 May 15.
6
Applying Risk Prediction Models to Optimize Lung Cancer Screening: Current Knowledge, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2017 Dec;4(4):307-320. doi: 10.1007/s40471-017-0126-8. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
8
Risk-Targeted Lung Cancer Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 6;168(3):161-169. doi: 10.7326/M17-1401. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
10
Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: A retrospective validation study.
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 4;14(4):e1002277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002277. eCollection 2017 Apr.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验