University of Liverpool, School of Veterinary Science, Leahurst, Neston, UK.
Equine Vet J. 2011 Sep;43(5):552-61. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00330.x. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
Evaluation of equine body fat content is important for nutritional and clinical purposes. However, our understanding of total body fat and its regional distribution in the body is sparse. Currently, body fat evaluation relies on the subjective assessment of body condition score (BCS), which has never been validated against 'gold standard' chemical analysis or dissection measurements in ponies.
To define the relationships between subjective (BCS), objective (morphometric) indices of body fat and 'gold standard' measurements of actual body composition.
BCS and morphometry offer valid, noninvasive methods for determination of body fat in equids.
Seven mature (mean ± s.e. 13 ± 3 years, 212 ± 14 kg, BCS 1.25-7/9), Welsh Mountain pony mares, destined for euthanasia (for nonresearch purposes), were used. For all ponies, body mass (BM), BCS and various morphometric measurements were recorded. Following euthanasia, all ponies were systematically dissected. Discrete white adipose tissue (WAT) depots were independently described. Gross, body chemical composition was determined by proximate analyses.
Total somatic soft tissues increased linearly (r(2) = 1.00), whereas body WAT content (1-26% live BM) increased exponentially (r(2) = 0.96), with BCS. WAT was equally distributed between internal and external sites in all animals irrespective of BCS. Nuchal fat was a poor predictor of total WAT (r(2) = 0.66). Periorbital WAT did not alter with BCS (r(2) = 0.01). Heart girth:withers height and ultrasonic retroperitoneal fat depth were closely associated with total, chemically-extracted lipid which comprised 1-29% live BM (r(2) = 0.91 and 0.88, respectively).
The exponential relationship between BCS and total body WAT/lipid suggests that BCS is unlikely to be a sensitive index of body fat for animals in moderate-obese states. Morphometric measurements (body girths and retroperitonel fat depth) may be useful to augment subjective BCS systems.
评估马体脂肪含量对于营养和临床目的非常重要。然而,我们对体脂总量及其在体内的分布区域的了解还很有限。目前,体脂评估依赖于对体况评分(BCS)的主观评估,而这种评估从未在小马驹中经过“金标准”化学分析或解剖测量的验证。
定义主观(BCS)、体脂肪的客观(形态计量)指标与“金标准”实际身体成分测量之间的关系。
BCS 和形态计量学为确定马的体脂提供了有效、非侵入性的方法。
使用 7 匹成熟(平均 ± 标准误 13 ± 3 岁,212 ± 14 千克,BCS 1.25-7/9)、威尔士山地母马,这些马驹被用于安乐死(非研究目的)。对所有马驹进行体重(BM)、BCS 和各种形态计量学测量记录。安乐死后,所有马驹均进行系统解剖。独立描述离散的白色脂肪组织(WAT)沉积物。通过近似分析确定总身体化学组成。
总躯体软组织呈线性增加(r² = 1.00),而体脂含量(占活体 BM 的 1-26%)呈指数增加(r² = 0.96),与 BCS 相关。WAT 在所有动物中均匀分布于内部和外部部位,与 BCS 无关。颈背脂肪是总 WAT 的一个较差预测因子(r² = 0.66)。眶周脂肪不随 BCS 变化(r² = 0.01)。胸围:肩高和超声后腹膜脂肪深度与总化学提取脂质密切相关,占活体 BM 的 1-29%(r² = 0.91 和 0.88)。
BCS 与总体 WAT/脂质呈指数关系表明,对于处于中度肥胖状态的动物,BCS 不太可能是体脂的敏感指标。形态计量学测量(体围和腹膜后脂肪深度)可能有助于补充主观 BCS 系统。