Silva Severiano R, Payan-Carreira Rita, Quaresma Miguel, Guedes Cristina M, Santos Ana Sofia
CECAV-Centro de Ciência Animal e Veterinária, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801, Vila Real, Portugal.
EUVG-Escola Universitária Vasco da Gama, Campus Universitário, Bloco B, Lordemão, 3020-210, Coimbra, Portugal.
Acta Vet Scand. 2016 Oct 20;58(Suppl 1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13028-016-0243-2.
In equids, health and welfare depend on body composition. A growing number of equids are now used as leisure and companion animals, and often found overfeed. The need for a close monitoring of body fatness led to the search for tools allowing a rapid and non-invasive estimation of fatness. This study intends to assess real-time ultrasonography (RTU) usefulness in establishing a relationship between ultrasound measures of subcutaneous fat-plus-skin thickness (SF-Skin) and body condition score (BCS) in horses and donkeys. Forty-three healthy animals (16 donkeys and 27 horses) were used in this study to generate 95 records (RTU and BCS pairs), in multiple RTU sessions for 2 years. Using visual appraisal and palpation, BCS was graded in a 1-9 points scale. Real-time ultrasonography images were taken using a 7.5 MHz linear transducer, placed perpendicular to the backbone, over the 3rd lumbar vertebra. ImageJ was used to measure the SF-Skin on RTU images. The relation between BCS and SF-Skin measurements was tested by linear and polynomial regression analysis.
The BCS values were similar in horses (5.50; from 3 to 8 points) and donkeys (5.14; from 3 to 7 points). The SF-Skin measures show a similar trend (a mean of 7.1 and 7.7 mm in horses and donkeys, respectively). A polynomial regression among BCS and SF-Skin explained 92 and 77 % of the variation in donkeys and horses respectively. The coefficient of determination was considerably higher for the regression developed for donkeys compared with that of horses (R2 = 0.92 vs. 0.77, respectively), which reduced the accuracy of the method in horses. Both the linear and polynomial models tested show a strong relationship among BCS and SF-Skin for donkeys (R2 > 0.91; P < 0.01) and horses (R2 > 0.74; P < 0.01), despite that the extremes for BCS did not existed in our sample.
Our results showed the potential RTU usefulness to monitor body fat in equids. Using a high-frequency transducer and RTU together with image analysis allowed the identification of small SF-skin variations. This report will support further studies on the relationships between SF-Skin and BCS, particularly in extreme BCS scores.
在马属动物中,健康和福利取决于身体组成。现在越来越多的马属动物被用作休闲和伴侣动物,并且经常被过度喂食。密切监测身体脂肪含量的需求促使人们寻找能够快速、非侵入性地评估脂肪含量的工具。本研究旨在评估实时超声检查(RTU)在建立马和驴的皮下脂肪加皮肤厚度(SF-Skin)超声测量值与身体状况评分(BCS)之间关系方面的实用性。本研究使用了43只健康动物(16头驴和27匹马),在2年的多个RTU检查环节中生成了95条记录(RTU和BCS配对数据)。通过视觉评估和触诊,BCS采用1-9分制进行评分。使用7.5MHz线性换能器,垂直于脊柱放置在第3腰椎上方,采集实时超声图像。使用ImageJ软件在RTU图像上测量SF-Skin。通过线性和多项式回归分析测试BCS与SF-Skin测量值之间的关系。
马(5.50;3至8分)和驴(5.14;3至7分)的BCS值相似。SF-Skin测量值呈现相似趋势(马和驴的平均值分别为7.1和7.7毫米)。BCS与SF-Skin之间的多项式回归分别解释了驴和马中92%和77%的变异。与马相比,为驴建立的回归的决定系数显著更高(R2分别为0.92和0.77),这降低了该方法在马中的准确性。尽管我们的样本中不存在BCS的极端值,但所测试的线性和多项式模型均显示驴(R2>0.91;P<0.01)和马(R2>0.74;P<0.01)的BCS与SF-Skin之间存在很强的关系。
我们的结果表明RTU在监测马属动物身体脂肪方面具有潜在的实用性。使用高频换能器和RTU并结合图像分析能够识别SF-皮肤的微小变化。本报告将支持进一步研究SF-Skin与BCS之间的关系,特别是在极端BCS评分方面。