• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂创伤环境中的方案偏离:错误还是创新?

Deviations from protocol in a complex trauma environment: errors or innovations?

机构信息

Simulation and Education Training Center, Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85016, USA.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2011 Jun;44(3):425-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2011.04.003
PMID:21496496
Abstract

Protocol standardizations are important for consistent and safe practices. However, complex clinical environments are highly dynamic in nature and often require clinicians, confronted with non-standard situations, to adjust and deviate from standard protocol. Some of these deviations are errors which can result in harmful outcomes. On the other hand, some of the deviations can be innovations, which are dynamic adjustments to the protocols made by people to adapt the current operational conditions and achieve high accuracy and efficiency. However, there is very little known about the underlying cognitive processes that are related to errors and innovations. In this study we investigate the extent to which deviations are classified as errors or innovations, as a function of expertise in a trauma setting. Field observations were conducted in a Level 1 trauma unit. A total of 10 trauma cases were observed and collected data was analyzed using measures that included customized activity-error-innovation ontology, timestamps and expertise of the team members. The results show that expertise of the caregivers and criticality of a patient's condition in critical care environment influence the number and type of deviations from standard protocol. Experts' deviations were a combination of errors and innovations; whereas the novices' deviations were mostly errors. This research suggests that a novel approach must be taken into consideration for the design of protocols (including standards) and compliance measurements in complex clinical environments.

摘要

方案标准化对于确保一致性和安全性至关重要。然而,复杂的临床环境本质上是高度动态的,往往要求临床医生在面对非标准情况时进行调整并偏离标准方案。其中一些偏差是错误,可能导致不良后果。另一方面,一些偏差可以是创新,这是人们对方案进行的动态调整,以适应当前的操作条件,并实现高精度和高效率。然而,人们对与错误和创新相关的潜在认知过程知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们调查了在创伤环境中,专业知识对偏差分类为错误或创新的程度。现场观察在一级创伤单位进行。共观察了 10 个创伤病例,并使用包括定制活动-错误-创新本体、团队成员的时间戳和专业知识在内的措施来分析收集的数据。结果表明,护理人员的专业知识和危重病患者在重症监护环境中的病情严重程度会影响偏离标准方案的次数和类型。专家的偏差是错误和创新的结合;而新手的偏差大多是错误。这项研究表明,在复杂的临床环境中,必须考虑采用新方法来设计方案(包括标准)和衡量合规性。

相似文献

1
Deviations from protocol in a complex trauma environment: errors or innovations?复杂创伤环境中的方案偏离:错误还是创新?
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Jun;44(3):425-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
2
Trauma intensive care unit survival: how good is an educated guess?创伤重症监护病房的生存率:凭经验猜测的准确性如何?
J Trauma. 2010 Jun;68(6):1279-87; discussion 1287-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181de3b99.
3
Video registration of trauma team performance in the emergency department: the results of a 2-year analysis in a Level 1 trauma center.急诊科创伤团队表现的视频记录:一级创伤中心的两年分析结果
J Trauma. 2009 Dec;67(6):1412-20. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818d0e43.
4
Improving safety for children with cardiac disease.提高患有心脏病儿童的安全性。
Cardiol Young. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 2:127-32. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107001230.
5
Adaptive behaviors of experts in following standard protocol in trauma management: implications for developing flexible guidelines.创伤管理中专家遵循标准协议的适应性行为:对制定灵活指南的启示
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:1412-21. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
6
Performance and consistency of care in admitted trauma patients: our next great opportunity in trauma care?创伤住院患者护理的绩效与一致性:这会是我们在创伤护理领域的下一个重大机遇吗?
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Jun;79(6):443-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04946.x.
7
Time for a change in injury and trauma care delivery: a trauma death review analysis.损伤与创伤护理交付模式变革的时机:创伤死亡回顾分析
ANZ J Surg. 2008 Nov;78(11):949-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04711.x.
8
Medication reconciliation in a rural trauma population.农村创伤人群的用药核对
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;52(5):483-91. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.03.021. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
9
Patient safety in trauma: maximal impact management errors at a level I trauma center.创伤患者的安全:一级创伤中心的最大影响管理失误
J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2):265-70; discussion 270-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318163359d.
10
Implementation of a mandatory checklist of protocols and objectives improves compliance with a wide range of evidence-based intensive care unit practices.实施一份包含协议和目标的强制性清单可提高对广泛的循证重症监护病房实践的依从性。
Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):2775-81. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a96379.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing Teamwork Delays during Life-Saving Interventions through an Activity Theory-Informed Analysis.通过基于活动理论的分析解决救生干预期间的团队协作延迟问题。
Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2025 Jan;9(1). doi: 10.1145/3701195. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
2
The effects of group adaptation on task performance: An agent-based approach.群体适应对任务绩效的影响:基于代理的方法。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 28;18(8):e0290578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290578. eCollection 2023.
3
Aligning work-as-imagined and work-as-done using FRAM on a hospital ward: a roadmap.
运用 FRAM 对齐医院病房中的想象中的工作和实际执行的工作:路线图。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Oct;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001992.
4
A scoping review of medical practice variation research within the informatics literature.医学实践变异研究在信息学文献中的范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Sep;165:104833. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104833. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
5
Classification strategies for non-routine events occurring in high-risk patient care settings: A scoping review.高风险患者护理环境中发生的非常规事件的分类策略:一项范围综述。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;27(2):464-471. doi: 10.1111/jep.13456. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
6
Developing a formal representation for medication appropriateness criteria.开发药物适宜性标准的形式化表示。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:1911-9. eCollection 2014.
7
Exclusion of context knowledge in the development of prehospital guidelines: results produced by realistic evaluation.排除背景知识对院前指南制定的影响:真实评价产生的结果。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013 Jun 22;21:46. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-46.
8
Nurses' workarounds in acute healthcare settings: a scoping review.护士在急性医疗机构中的应对措施:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 May 11;13:175. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-175.
9
Adaptive behaviors of experts in following standard protocol in trauma management: implications for developing flexible guidelines.创伤管理中专家遵循标准协议的适应性行为:对制定灵活指南的启示
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:1412-21. Epub 2012 Nov 3.