Suppr超能文献

盆腔淋巴结清扫术在老年人群中的重要性:对解读 2010 年美国国家综合癌症网络膀胱癌治疗实践指南的影响。

The importance of pelvic lymph node dissection in the elderly population: implications for interpreting the 2010 National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guidelines for bladder cancer treatment.

机构信息

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6):2078-84. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.022. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guidelines indicate that pelvic lymph node dissection can be omitted at radical cystectomy in elderly patients. We examined the pelvic lymph node dissection rate in patients 80 years old or older and the impact of pelvic lymph node dissection on cancer specific and overall mortality in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined the records of 11,183 patients treated with radical cystectomy in 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis to test the effect of pelvic lymph node dissection on cancer specific and overall mortality.

RESULTS

Overall pelvic lymph node dissection was omitted in 25% of patients, including 24.2% younger than 80 years and 30.8% 80 years old or older (p <0.001). The 5-year rate of freedom from cancer specific mortality for pelvic lymph node dissection vs no pelvic lymph node dissection was 62.5% vs 59.9% in patients younger than 80 years, and 50.0% vs 46.1% in those 80 years old or older (p = 0.01 and 0.005, respectively). The 5-year rate of freedom from overall mortality for the same categories was 48.8% vs 43.9% and 28.3% vs 24.7% (p <0.001 and 0.01, respectively). On multivariate analysis omitting pelvic lymph node dissection was associated with a 1.3-fold higher cancer specific rate at ages less than 80 and 80 years or greater (each p <0.001). Omitting pelvic lymph node dissection was also associated with a 1.3-fold higher overall mortality rate, including 1.3 at ages less than 80 years and 1.2-fold at ages 80 years or greater (each p ≤0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate that pelvic lymph node dissection was more often omitted in patients 80 years old or older than in those younger than 80 years. However, the protective effect of pelvic lymph node dissection on cancer specific and overall mortality was virtually the same in the 2 age categories. Thus, advanced age should not be a limiting factor for performing pelvic lymph node dissection at radical cystectomy.

摘要

目的

美国国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)的实践指南指出,在根治性膀胱切除术时,老年患者可以省略盆腔淋巴结清扫术。我们研究了 80 岁及以上患者中盆腔淋巴结清扫术的比例,并研究了在这些患者中进行盆腔淋巴结清扫术对癌症特异性和总死亡率的影响。

材料和方法

我们检查了 17 个监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)登记处中 11183 例接受根治性膀胱切除术的患者的记录。我们进行了单变量和多变量 Cox 回归分析,以检验盆腔淋巴结清扫术对癌症特异性和总死亡率的影响。

结果

总体而言,25%的患者省略了盆腔淋巴结清扫术,其中 24.2%的患者年龄小于 80 岁,30.8%的患者年龄为 80 岁或以上(p<0.001)。在年龄小于 80 岁的患者中,进行盆腔淋巴结清扫术与不进行盆腔淋巴结清扫术的 5 年无癌症特异性死亡率分别为 62.5%和 59.9%,而在 80 岁或以上的患者中,这一比例分别为 50.0%和 46.1%(p=0.01 和 0.005)。在同一类别中,5 年总死亡率的无病生存率分别为 48.8%和 43.9%和 28.3%和 24.7%(p<0.001 和 0.01)。多变量分析表明,在年龄小于 80 岁和 80 岁或以上的患者中,不进行盆腔淋巴结清扫术与癌症特异性生存率增加 1.3 倍相关(均 p<0.001)。不进行盆腔淋巴结清扫术也与总死亡率增加 1.3 倍相关,包括年龄小于 80 岁的患者增加 1.3 倍和年龄为 80 岁或以上的患者增加 1.2 倍(均 p≤0.005)。

结论

结果表明,与年龄小于 80 岁的患者相比,80 岁或以上的患者更常省略盆腔淋巴结清扫术。然而,在这两个年龄组中,盆腔淋巴结清扫术对癌症特异性和总死亡率的保护作用几乎相同。因此,高龄不应成为在根治性膀胱切除术中进行盆腔淋巴结清扫术的限制因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验