Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychoses (PEPP-Montreal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Schizophr Res. 2011 Jun;129(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.03.022. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
Stress-vulnerability models of schizophrenia regard psychosocial stress as an important factor in the onset and aggravation of psychotic symptoms, but such research in the early phases of psychosis is limited. Protective factors against the effects of stress might be the key to understanding some inconclusive findings and to the development of optimal psychosocial interventions. The present study compared self-reported levels of stress, self-esteem, social support and active coping in 32 patients with a first episode of psychosis (FEP), 30 individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) and 30 healthy controls. Associations with symptoms of psychosis were assessed in both patient groups. Individuals at UHR reported significantly higher stress levels compared to FEP patients. Both patient groups showed lower self-esteem compared to controls, and the UHR group reported lower social support and active coping than controls. These group differences could not be explained by age and dose of antipsychotic medication in the FEP group. In the UHR group, higher stress levels and lower self-esteem were associated with more severe positive and depressive symptoms on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Multiple regression analyses revealed that stress was the only significant predictor for both symptom measures and that the relationship was not moderated by self-esteem. Our findings show that individuals at UHR for psychosis experience high levels of psychosocial stress and marked deficits in protective factors. The results suggest that psychosocial interventions targeted at reducing stress levels and improving resilience in this population may be beneficial in improving outcomes.
精神分裂症的应激易损性模型认为心理社会应激是精神病症状发作和加重的一个重要因素,但在精神病早期阶段的此类研究有限。应激的保护因素可能是理解一些不一致发现的关键,也是发展最佳心理社会干预措施的关键。本研究比较了 32 名首发精神病(FEP)患者、30 名精神病超高风险(UHR)个体和 30 名健康对照者的自我报告应激水平、自尊、社会支持和积极应对水平。在两个患者组中评估了与精神病症状的关联。与 FEP 患者相比,UHR 个体报告的应激水平明显更高。与对照组相比,两个患者组的自尊水平均较低,而 UHR 组的社会支持和积极应对水平均低于对照组。FEP 组中年龄和抗精神病药物剂量并不能解释这些组间差异。在 UHR 组中,较高的应激水平和较低的自尊与 Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale 上更严重的阳性和抑郁症状相关。多元回归分析显示,应激是两个症状测量的唯一显著预测因子,而自尊并不能调节这种关系。我们的研究结果表明,精神病超高风险的个体经历高水平的心理社会应激和明显的保护因素缺陷。结果表明,针对降低这一人群的应激水平和提高适应力的心理社会干预措施可能有助于改善预后。