Suppr超能文献

通过锥形束计算机断层扫描对下颌不对称进行三维定量分析。

Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetry through cone-beam computerized tomography.

作者信息

Cevidanes Lucia H S, Alhadidi Abeer, Paniagua Beatriz, Styner Martin, Ludlow John, Mol Andre, Turvey Timothy, Proffit William R, Rossouw Paul Emile

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Jun;111(6):757-70. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Apr 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if 3-dimensional (3D) shape analysis precisely diagnoses right and left differences in asymmetry patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Cone-beam computerized tomography (CT) data were acquired before treatment from 20 patients with mandibular asymmetry. 3D shape analysis was used to localize and quantify the extent of virtually simulated asymmetry. Two approaches were used: 1) mirroring on the midsagittal plane determined from landmarks; and 2) mirroring on an arbitrary plane and then registering on the cranial base of the original image. The validation presented in this study used simulated data and was applied to 3 clinical cases.

RESULTS

For mirroring on the midsagittal plane, there was a >99% probability that the difference between measured and simulated asymmetry was <0.5 mm. For mirroring with cranial base registration, there was a >84% probability of differences <0.5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandibular asymmetry can be precisely quantified with both mirroring methods. Cranial base registration has the potential to be used for patients with trauma situations or when key landmarks are unreliable or absent.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定三维(3D)形状分析能否精确诊断不对称患者的左右差异。

研究设计

在治疗前从20名下颌不对称患者获取锥束计算机断层扫描(CT)数据。使用3D形状分析来定位和量化虚拟模拟不对称的程度。采用了两种方法:1)在由地标确定的正中矢状面上进行镜像;2)在任意平面上进行镜像,然后在原始图像的颅底上进行配准。本研究中呈现的验证使用了模拟数据,并应用于3个临床病例。

结果

对于在正中矢状面上进行镜像,测量的不对称与模拟的不对称之间差异<0.5毫米的概率>99%。对于进行颅底配准的镜像,差异<0.5毫米的概率>84%。

结论

两种镜像方法均可精确量化下颌不对称。颅底配准有可能用于创伤情况的患者或关键地标不可靠或不存在的情况。

相似文献

1
Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetry through cone-beam computerized tomography.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Jun;111(6):757-70. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
2
3D quantification of mandibular asymmetry using the SPHARM-PDM tool box.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012 Mar;7(2):265-71. doi: 10.1007/s11548-011-0665-2. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
5
A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry--a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Jan;35(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.04.006. Epub 2005 May 31.
6
Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Feb;149(2):225-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.038.
7
Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular asymmetry: a new classification and three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug;47(8):1043-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Apr 8.
8
Using the anterior cranial base to provide a reliable reference plane for patients with or without facial asymmetry.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Nov;162(5):e230-e245. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
10
Lower face cephalometry based on quadrilateral analysis with cone-beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study.
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;21(2):207-218. doi: 10.1007/s10006-017-0620-7. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in mandibular canal position in different sagittal skeletal patterns: a CBCT study.
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2025 Apr;38(1):20-28. doi: 10.54589/aol.38/1/20.
2
3D facial mask for facial asymmetry diagnosis.
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 23;10(5):e26734. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26734. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
5
Three-Dimensional Quantification of Facial Morphology and Movements Using a Wearable Helmet.
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Feb 23;2022:2774713. doi: 10.1155/2022/2774713. eCollection 2022.
6
Directions of mandibular canal displacement in ameloblastoma: A computed tomography mirrored-method analysis.
Imaging Sci Dent. 2021 Mar;51(1):17-25. doi: 10.5624/isd.20200132. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
8
Surgical-orthodontic treatment for class II asymmetry: outcome and influencing factors.
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 29;9(1):17956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54317-5.
9
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics.
Dent J (Basel). 2019 Sep 2;7(3):89. doi: 10.3390/dj7030089.
10
A comparison between 2D and 3D methods of quantifying facial morphology.
Heliyon. 2019 Jun 14;5(6):e01880. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01880. eCollection 2019 Jun.

本文引用的文献

2
Three-dimensional surgical simulation.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Sep;138(3):361-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.08.026.
3
Cranial base superimposition for 3-dimensional evaluation of soft-tissue changes.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4 Suppl):S120-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.021.
4
A not-so-tender trap.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Nov;136(5):619-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.09.003.
5
A new system for computer-aided preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation during corrective jaw surgery.
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2007 May;11(3):274-87. doi: 10.1109/titb.2006.884372.
7
Pitch, roll, and yaw: describing the spatial orientation of dentofacial traits.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.032.
9
Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgery.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jan;131(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.03.029.
10
Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):611-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.008.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验