• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反应率追踪强化次数的历史。

Response rates track the history of reinforcement times.

作者信息

Harris Justin A, Gharaei Saba, Pincham Hannah L

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jul;37(3):277-86. doi: 10.1037/a0023079.

DOI:10.1037/a0023079
PMID:21500934
Abstract

When conditioning involves a consistent temporal relationship between the conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US), the expression of conditioned responses within a trial peaks at the usual time of the US relative to the CS. Here we examine the temporal profile of responses during conditioning with variable CS-US intervals. We conditioned stimuli with either uniformly distributed or exponentially distributed random CS-US intervals. In the former case, the frequency of each CS-US interval within a specified range is uniform but the momentary probability of the US (the hazard function) increases as time elapses during the trial; with the latter distribution, short CS-US intervals are more frequent than longer intervals, but the momentary probability of the US is constant across time within the trial. We report that, in a magazine approach paradigm, rats' response rates remained stable as time elapses during the CS when the CS-US intervals were uniformly distributed, whereas their response rates declined when the CS-US intervals were exponentially distributed. In other words, the profile of responding during the CS matched the frequency distribution of the US times, not the momentary probability of the US during the CS. These results are inconsistent with real-time associative models, which predict that associative strength tracks the momentary probability of the US, but may provide support for timing models of conditioning in which conditioned responding is tied to remembered times of reinforcement.

摘要

当条件作用涉及条件刺激(CS)与非条件刺激(US)之间一致的时间关系时,在一次试验中条件反应的表达会在相对于CS的US通常出现时间达到峰值。在此,我们研究了在条件刺激与非条件刺激间隔可变的条件作用过程中反应的时间特征。我们用均匀分布或指数分布的随机条件刺激与非条件刺激间隔对刺激进行条件作用。在前一种情况下,指定范围内每个条件刺激与非条件刺激间隔的频率是均匀的,但在试验过程中,非条件刺激的瞬时概率(风险函数)会随着时间的推移而增加;在后一种分布中,短的条件刺激与非条件刺激间隔比长的间隔更频繁,但在试验过程中,非条件刺激的瞬时概率在整个时间内是恒定的。我们报告称,在一种接近食盒的范式中,当条件刺激与非条件刺激间隔均匀分布时,随着条件刺激过程中时间的推移,大鼠的反应率保持稳定,而当条件刺激与非条件刺激间隔呈指数分布时,它们的反应率会下降。换句话说,在条件刺激期间的反应特征与非条件刺激出现时间的频率分布相匹配,而不是与条件刺激期间非条件刺激的瞬时概率相匹配。这些结果与实时联想模型不一致,实时联想模型预测联想强度会追踪非条件刺激的瞬时概率,但可能为条件作用的时间模型提供支持,在该模型中,条件反应与记忆中的强化时间相关联。

相似文献

1
Response rates track the history of reinforcement times.反应率追踪强化次数的历史。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jul;37(3):277-86. doi: 10.1037/a0023079.
2
Summation of reinforcement rates when conditioned stimuli are presented in compound.当复合呈现条件刺激时强化率的总和。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Oct;37(4):385-93. doi: 10.1037/a0024553.
3
A role for CS-US contingency in Pavlovian conditioning.条件刺激-非条件刺激的关联性在巴甫洛夫条件反射中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Jul;30(3):229-39. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.30.3.229.
4
Magazine approach during a signal for food depends on Pavlovian, not instrumental, conditioning.在食物信号出现时的趋近行为取决于巴甫洛夫式条件作用,而非工具性条件作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013 Apr;39(2):107-16. doi: 10.1037/a0031315. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
5
Associative changes with a random CS-US relationship.
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2000 Nov;53(4):325-40. doi: 10.1080/713932736.
6
Hypothermia modifies the effective CS-US interval in conditioned taste aversion in rats.体温过低会改变大鼠条件性味觉厌恶中有效的条件刺激-非条件刺激间隔。
Neurosci Lett. 2004 Oct 14;369(2):142-4. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.077.
7
Pavlovian conditioning and cumulative reinforcement rate.巴甫洛夫条件反射与累积强化率
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Apr;41(2):137-51. doi: 10.1037/xan0000054. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
8
The comparator hypothesis of conditioned response generation: manifest conditioned excitation and inhibition as a function of relative excitatory strengths of CS and conditioning context at the time of testing.条件反应产生的比较器假说:在测试时,根据条件刺激(CS)和条件化情境的相对兴奋性强度表现出明显的条件性兴奋和抑制。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1987 Oct;13(4):395-406.
9
A time contraction effect of acute tail-pinch stress on the associative learning of rats.急性夹尾应激对大鼠联想学习的时间收缩效应。
Behav Processes. 2006 Jan 10;71(1):16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.09.001. Epub 2005 Oct 25.
10
CS-US interval as a determinant of the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responses.条件刺激与非条件刺激间隔作为巴甫洛夫式食欲性条件反应形式的一个决定因素。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1980 Apr;6(2):155-74.

引用本文的文献

1
Time-scale invariant contingency yields one-shot reinforcement learning despite extremely long delays to reinforcement.时间不变协变量尽管强化延迟非常长,但仍能产生单次强化学习。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jul 23;121(30):e2405451121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2405451121. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
2
Hazard function effects on promoting self-control in variable interval time-based interventions in rats.危险函数对大鼠基于可变时间间隔的自我控制促进干预的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2021 Nov;116(3):279-299. doi: 10.1002/jeab.722. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
3
Cue duration determines response rate but not rate of acquisition of Pavlovian conditioning in mice.
线索持续时间决定了反应率,但不决定小鼠条件反射的获得率。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Nov;73(11):2026-2035. doi: 10.1177/1747021820937696. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
4
Effects of conditioned stimulus (CS) duration, intertrial interval, and I/T ratio on appetitive Pavlovian conditioning.条件刺激(CS)持续时间、试验间间隔和 I/T 比率对食欲性巴甫洛夫条件反射的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020 Jul;46(3):243-255. doi: 10.1037/xan0000241. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
5
Delay of reinforcement versus rate of reinforcement in Pavlovian conditioning.巴甫洛夫条件反射中强化延迟与强化速率的比较
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(2):203-221. doi: 10.1037/xan0000199. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
6
The effects of stimulus distribution form during trace conditioning.痕迹条件作用期间刺激分布形式的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Feb;72(2):285-297. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1367017. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
7
Everywhere and everything: The power and ubiquity of time.无处不在,无所不包:时间的力量与普遍性。
Int J Comp Psychol. 2015;28.
8
Temporal contingency.时间偶然性
Behav Processes. 2014 Jan;101:89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
9
Adjunctive behaviors are operants.辅助行为是操作性行为。
Learn Behav. 2013 Mar;41(1):1-24. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0095-1.
10
Blood pressure variations real-time reflect the conditioned fear learning and memory.血压变化实时反映条件性恐惧学习和记忆。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e32855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032855. Epub 2012 Apr 4.