• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项前瞻性、多中心、随机临床研究比较了 3 天厄他培南与 3 天氨苄西林/舒巴坦治疗局部获得性社区内腹腔感染的疗效和安全性。(T.E.A. 研究:3 天厄他培南对比 3 天氨苄西林/舒巴坦)

A prospective, multi centre, randomized clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin-Sulbactam 3 days in the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infection. (T.E.A. Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-sulbactam).

机构信息

Unit of General, Emergency and Transplant Surgery, St, Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr 18;11:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-42.

DOI:10.1186/1471-230X-11-42
PMID:21501482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3090366/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recommendations outlined in the latest guidelines published by the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) regarding the proper duration of antibiotic therapy in patients with intra-abdominal infections are limited and non-specific. This ambiguity is due mainly to the lack of clinical trials on the topic of optimal duration of therapy. It is well known that the overuse of antibiotics has several important consequences such as increased treatment costs, reduced clinical efficacy, and above all, the increased emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Ampicillin-Sulbactam is a commonly used "first line" antibiotic for intra-abdominal infections. Ertapenem and Ampicillin-sulbactam are recommended as primary treatment agents for localized peritonitis by both the SIS and IDSA guidelines.

METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a prospective multi-center randomized investigation. The study will be performed in the Departments of General, Emergency, and Transplant Surgery of Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital in Bologna, Italy, in the General Surgery Department of the Ospedali Riuniti of Bergamo, Italy, and in the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Department of Maggiore Hospital in Bologna, Italy, and will be conducted by all surgeons willing to participate in the study. The inclusion period of the study will take approximately two years before the planned number of 142 enrolled patients is reached.

DISCUSSION

Ertapenem and Ampicillin-sulbactam are recommended both as primary treatment agents for localized peritonitis by both the SIS and IDSA guidelines. As one of the discussed topic is the optimal duration of the antibiotic therapy and this ambiguity is due mainly to the lack of clinical trials on the topic, the present study aims for obtain precise data.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00630513.

摘要

背景

外科感染学会(SIS)和美国传染病学会(IDSA)最近发布的指南中概述的关于腹腔内感染患者抗生素治疗适当持续时间的建议是有限且非特异性的。这种不明确性主要是由于缺乏关于最佳治疗持续时间的临床试验。众所周知,抗生素的过度使用会带来几个重要的后果,如治疗成本增加、临床疗效降低,尤其是抗生素耐药病原体的增加。氨苄西林-舒巴坦是治疗腹腔内感染的常用“一线”抗生素。SIS 和 IDSA 指南均推荐厄他培南和氨苄西林-舒巴坦作为局限性腹膜炎的主要治疗药物。

方法/设计:本研究是一项前瞻性多中心随机研究。该研究将在意大利博洛尼亚圣奥尔索拉-马焦雷大学医院的普通外科、急诊和移植外科系、意大利贝加莫的 Ospedali Riuniti 普通外科系以及意大利博洛尼亚的马焦雷医院创伤和急诊外科系进行,由所有愿意参与研究的外科医生进行。研究的纳入期约为两年,直到计划纳入的 142 名患者达到目标数量。

讨论

SIS 和 IDSA 指南均推荐厄他培南和氨苄西林-舒巴坦作为局限性腹膜炎的主要治疗药物。由于讨论的一个话题是抗生素治疗的最佳持续时间,而这种不明确性主要是由于缺乏关于该主题的临床试验,因此本研究旨在获得精确的数据。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00630513。

相似文献

1
A prospective, multi centre, randomized clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin-Sulbactam 3 days in the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infection. (T.E.A. Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-sulbactam).一项前瞻性、多中心、随机临床研究比较了 3 天厄他培南与 3 天氨苄西林/舒巴坦治疗局部获得性社区内腹腔感染的疗效和安全性。(T.E.A. 研究:3 天厄他培南对比 3 天氨苄西林/舒巴坦)
BMC Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr 18;11:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-42.
2
T.E.A. Study: three-day ertapenem versus three-day Ampicillin-Sulbactam.T.E.A. 研究:3 天厄他培南与 3 天氨苄西林-舒巴坦。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr 30;13:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-76.
3
Susceptibility to antibiotics of aerobic bacteria isolated from community acquired secondary peritonitis in children: therapeutic guidelines might not always fit with and everyday experience.从儿童社区获得性继发性腹膜炎中分离出的需氧菌对抗生素的敏感性:治疗指南可能并不总是符合日常经验。
J Chemother. 2013 Aug;25(4):213-6. doi: 10.1179/1973947813Y.0000000083.
4
Efficacy and safety of ertapenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections requiring surgical intervention.厄他培南与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗需要手术干预的腹腔内感染的疗效与安全性比较
J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Apr;10(4):567-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.06.015.
5
Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline vs Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections in the Investigating Gram-Negative Infections Treated With Eravacycline (IGNITE 1) Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial.评估依拉环素与厄他培南治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的疗效和安全性:一项针对革兰氏阴性感染的依拉环素治疗(IGNITE 1)试验:随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):224-232. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4237.
6
ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN BARIATRIC SURGERY: a continuous infusion of cefazolin versus ampicillin/sulbactam and ertapenem.减重手术中的抗生素预防:头孢唑林持续输注与氨苄西林/舒巴坦及厄他培南的比较
Arq Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr-Jun;52(2):83-7. doi: 10.1590/S0004-28032015000200002.
7
Prospective, randomized, study of ampicillin-sulbactam versus moxifloxacin monotherapy for the treatment of community-acquired complicated intra-abdominal infections.氨苄西林-舒巴坦与莫西沙星单药治疗社区获得性复杂性腹腔内感染的前瞻性、随机研究。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013 Aug;14(4):389-96. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.017. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
8
Ampicillin-sulbactam: an update on the use of parenteral and oral forms in bacterial infections.氨苄西林-舒巴坦:关于其注射剂和口服制剂在细菌感染中应用的最新进展
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2009 Sep;5(9):1099-112. doi: 10.1517/17425250903145251.
9
A prospective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial comparing ertapenem 3 vs >or=5 days in community-acquired intraabdominal infection.一项前瞻性、双盲、多中心、随机试验,比较厄他培南3天与≥5天治疗社区获得性腹腔内感染的疗效。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Mar;12(3):592-600. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0277-x. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
10
Randomized, multicenter, double-blind study of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults.厄他培南静脉注射与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗住院成人复杂性腹腔内感染的疗效、安全性和耐受性的随机、多中心、双盲研究
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2007 Feb;8(1):15-28. doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.030.

引用本文的文献

1
T.E.A. Study: three-day ertapenem versus three-day Ampicillin-Sulbactam.T.E.A. 研究:3 天厄他培南与 3 天氨苄西林-舒巴坦。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr 30;13:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-76.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of discontinuing antibiotic treatment after three days versus eight days in mild to moderate-severe community acquired pneumonia: randomised, double blind study.轻度至中重度社区获得性肺炎患者抗生素治疗3天与8天后停药的有效性:随机双盲研究
BMJ. 2006 Jun 10;332(7554):1355. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7554.1355.
2
Efficacy and safety of ertapenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections requiring surgical intervention.厄他培南与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗需要手术干预的腹腔内感染的疗效与安全性比较
J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Apr;10(4):567-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.06.015.
3
Minimum postoperative antibiotic duration in advanced appendicitis in children: a review.儿童晚期阑尾炎术后抗生素的最短使用时长:一项综述
Pediatr Surg Int. 2004 Dec;20(11-12):838-45. doi: 10.1007/s00383-004-1280-x. Epub 2004 Oct 6.
4
Modern surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy--less is more.现代外科手术抗生素预防与治疗——少即是多。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2000;1(1):23-9. doi: 10.1089/109629600321263.
5
The Surgical Infection Society guidelines on antimicrobial therapy for intra-abdominal infections: evidence for the recommendations.外科感染学会关于腹腔内感染抗菌治疗的指南:推荐依据
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2002 Fall;3(3):175-233. doi: 10.1089/109629602761624180.
6
Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in intra-abdominal infections requiring surgery. Meropenem Study Group.美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁用于需要手术治疗的腹腔内感染。美罗培南研究组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:191-205. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.191.
7
Carbapenems: monotherapy in intra-abdominal sepsis.碳青霉烯类药物:用于腹腔内脓毒症的单一疗法。
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995;96:28-33.
8
A proposed classification of intra-abdominal infections. Stratification of etiology and risk for future therapeutic trials.腹内感染的一种拟议分类。病因分层及对未来治疗试验的风险评估
Arch Surg. 1984 Dec;119(12):1372-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390240010002.
9
Intraabdominal infections: an overview.腹腔内感染:概述
Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Nov-Dec;7 Suppl 4:S709-15. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.supplement_4.s709.
10
APACHE II score and abdominal sepsis. A prospective study.急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)与腹部脓毒症。一项前瞻性研究。
Arch Surg. 1988 Feb;123(2):225-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400260113014.