Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1AG, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr 19;11:82. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-82.
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are potential instruments to enable private collaboration in the health sector. Despite theoretical debate, empirical analyses have thus far tended to focus on the contractual or project dimension, overlooking institutional PPPs, i.e., formal legal entities run by proper corporate-governance mechanisms and jointly owned by public and private parties for the provision of public-health goods. This work aims to fill this gap by carrying out a comparative analysis of the reasons for the adoption of institutional PPPs and the governance and managerial features necessary to establish them as appropriate arrangements for public-health services provisions.
A qualitative analysis is carried out on experiences of institutional PPPs within the Italian National Health Service (Sistema Sanitario Nazionale, SSN). The research question is addressed through a contextual and comparative embedded case study design, assuming the entire population of PPPs (4) currently in force in one Italian region as the unit of analysis: (i) a rehabilitation hospital, (ii), an orthopaedic-centre, (iii) a primary care and ambulatory services facility, and (iv) a health- and social-care facility. Internal validity is guaranteed by the triangulation of sources in the data collection phase, which included archival and interview data.
Four governance and managerial issues were found to be critical in determining the positive performance of the case examined: (i) a strategic market orientation to a specialised service area with sufficient potential demand, (ii) the allocation of public capital assets and the consistent financial involvement of the private partner, (iii) the adoption of private administrative procedures in a regulated setting while guaranteeing the respect of public administration principles, and (iv) clear regulation of the workforce to align the contracts with the organisational culture.
Findings suggests that institutional PPPs enable national health services to reap great benefits when introduced as a complement to the traditional public-service provisions for a defined set of services and goals.
公私合作伙伴关系(PPPs)是使私营部门能够参与卫生部门合作的潜在手段。尽管存在理论上的争议,但迄今为止,实证分析往往侧重于合同或项目层面,而忽略了体制 PPP,即由适当的公司治理机制管理的正式法律实体,由公共和私人部门共同拥有,用于提供公共卫生产品。这项工作旨在通过对体制公私合作伙伴关系的采用原因以及建立这些关系所需的治理和管理特征进行比较分析,来填补这一空白,以确定其是否为公共卫生服务提供的适当安排。
对意大利国家卫生服务体系(Sistema Sanitario Nazionale,SSN)内部体制公私合作伙伴关系的经验进行了定性分析。研究问题通过上下文和比较嵌入式案例研究设计来解决,将一个意大利地区目前有效的所有 PPP(4)作为分析单位:(一)康复医院,(二)骨科中心,(三)初级保健和门诊服务设施,以及(四)健康和社会护理设施。在数据收集阶段,通过对来源的三角验证保证了内部有效性,其中包括档案和访谈数据。
发现有四个治理和管理问题对于确定所审查案例的积极表现至关重要:(一)对具有足够潜在需求的特定服务领域的战略性市场定位,(二)公共资本资产的分配和私人合作伙伴的一致财务参与,(三)在监管环境中采用私人行政程序,同时保证公共行政原则的尊重,以及(四)明确规定劳动力,使合同与组织文化保持一致。
研究结果表明,体制公私合作伙伴关系在作为对特定服务和目标的传统公共服务提供的补充引入时,可以使国家卫生服务从中获得巨大收益。