• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头颈部位置对全身麻醉下使用 i-gel 气道通气的影响。

The influence of head and neck position on ventilation with the i-gel airway in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Aug;28(8):597-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834698f4.

DOI:10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834698f4
PMID:21505345
Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

We hypothesised that head and neck position could affect the effectiveness of ventilation with the i-gel airway. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the influence of different head and neck positions on oropharyngeal sealing pressures and ventilation scores during ventilation with i-gel.

METHODS

A single, experienced supraglottic airway device user inserted the i-gel in 20 paralysed, anaesthetised patients who were scheduled for oral surgery. Oropharyngeal leak pressures and ventilation scores were measured with the head and neck in the neutral position, flexed, extended or rotated to the right. Ventilation was scored from 0 to 3 based on three criteria (no leakage with an airway pressure of 15 cmH2O, bilateral chest excursion and a square wave capnogram; each item scoring 0 or 1 point).

RESULTS

Compared with the neutral position (25.8 ± 5.2 cmH2O), oropharyngeal leak pressure was significantly higher with flexion (28.5 ± 3.4 cmH2O, P=0.015) and lower with extension (23.0 ± 4.2 cmH2O, P=0.015), but similar with rotation (26.7 ± 5.1 cmH2O, P=0.667). Flexion of the head and neck [2 (1-3)] adversely affected the ventilation score compared with the neutral position [3 (2-3), P=0.004].

CONCLUSION

Effective ventilation with an i-gel can be performed in patients in whom the head and neck is extended or rotated, whereas flexion of the head and neck adversely affects ventilation. Clinically, flexion of the head and neck should be avoided during ventilation with the i-gel.

摘要

背景和目的

我们假设头颈部位置可能会影响 i-gel 气道通气的效果。为了验证这一假设,我们研究了不同头颈部位置对 i-gel 通气时口咽密封压和通气评分的影响。

方法

一位经验丰富的声门上气道装置使用者在 20 名接受全身麻醉的拟行口腔手术的患者中插入 i-gel。头颈部处于中立位、屈曲位、伸展位或向右侧旋转时,测量口咽漏压和通气评分。通气评分根据三个标准进行评估:在气道压力为 15cmH2O 时无泄漏、双侧胸廓起伏和方波呼气末二氧化碳图(每项 0 或 1 分)。

结果

与中立位(25.8 ± 5.2cmH2O)相比,头颈部屈曲时口咽漏压显著升高(28.5 ± 3.4cmH2O,P=0.015),伸展时显著降低(23.0 ± 4.2cmH2O,P=0.015),但与旋转时相似(26.7 ± 5.1cmH2O,P=0.667)。与中立位相比,头颈部屈曲时通气评分更差[2(1-3)](P=0.004)。

结论

在头颈部伸展或旋转的患者中,可以有效地使用 i-gel 进行通气,而头颈部屈曲会对通气产生不利影响。临床上,在使用 i-gel 通气时应避免头颈部屈曲。

相似文献

1
The influence of head and neck position on ventilation with the i-gel airway in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.头颈部位置对全身麻醉下使用 i-gel 气道通气的影响。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Aug;28(8):597-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834698f4.
2
Flexion compromises ventilation with the laryngeal tube suction II in children.儿童使用喉罩二代进行通气时,屈曲动作会影响通气效果。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Feb;19(2):153-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02861.x. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
3
Influence of head and neck position on ventilation using the air-Q® SP airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients: a prospective randomized crossover study.头颈部位置对麻醉肌松患者使用 air-Q® SP 气道通气的影响:一项前瞻性随机交叉研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):452-457. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew448.
4
A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure.一项比较一次性喉管吸引器与喉罩的随机前瞻性对照试验:头颈部位置对口咽密封压力的影响。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0237-7.
5
The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.头颈部位置对使用柔性和标准喉罩气道时口咽漏气压及套囊位置的影响
Anesth Analg. 1999 Apr;88(4):913-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00042.
6
The influence of head and neck position on the oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position of three supraglottic airway devices.头颈部位置对三种声门上气道装置的口咽漏气压及套囊位置的影响
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jan;108(1):112-7. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318192376f.
7
Influence of head and neck position on the performance of supraglottic airway devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.头颈部位置对声门上气道装置性能的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 May 9;14(5):e0216673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216673. eCollection 2019.
8
Influence of Head and Neck Position on Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Cuff Position with the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway and the I-Gel: A Randomized Clinical Trial.头颈部位置对使用ProSeal喉罩气道和I-Gel时口咽漏气压及套囊位置的影响:一项随机临床试验
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2015;2015:705869. doi: 10.1155/2015/705869. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
9
Evaluation of I-gel™ airway in different head and neck positions in anesthetized paralyzed children.在麻醉瘫痪儿童中评估不同头颈部位置下的I-gel™气道。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Dec;25(12):1248-53. doi: 10.1111/pan.12748. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
10
Randomized evaluation of the size 2 laryngeal tube and classical laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions in children under positive pressure ventilation.在正压通气下不同头颈部位置的 2 号喉管和经典喉罩气道在儿童中的随机评估。
J Anesth. 2013 Oct;27(5):657-62. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1583-y. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure in head rotation between a first-generation laryngeal mask and the i-gel laryngeal mask during general anesthesia - a randomized controlled trial.全身麻醉期间第一代喉罩与i-gel喉罩在头部旋转时口咽漏气压的比较——一项随机对照试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Sep 17;25(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03368-5.
2
Influence of head rotation on oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA-Protector and i-gel® in paralysed, anaesthetised patients: A randomised comparative study.头部旋转对麻痹、麻醉患者喉罩气道-保护型和i-gel®口咽漏气压的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Jul;69(7):681-686. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1164_24. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
3
Comparison of I-gel and Baska mask in elective surgery: a meta-analysis.
I-gel喉罩与Baska面罩用于择期手术的比较:一项荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e085832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085832.
4
How does head position affect laryngeal vision with a video laryngeal mask airway?头部位置如何影响使用视频喉罩气道时的喉部视野?
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 16;11:1469225. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1469225. eCollection 2024.
5
Comparison between Air-Q Self Pressurized Airway Device with Blocker and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult female patients undergoing elective gynecological operations.比较全麻下留置通气道的女性患者应用自主充气型气道装置与 Proseal 喉罩通气道的效果。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2024;56(2):108-120. doi: 10.5114/ait.2024.141203.
6
Comparing leak pressure of LMA ProSeal™ versus i-gel at head rotation: a randomized controlled trial.比较LMA ProSeal™与i-gel在头部旋转时的漏气压力:一项随机对照试验。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jan;71(1):66-76. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02648-3. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
7
A Prospective Randomized Study for the Placement of Flexible Laryngeal Airway Mask with Two-Step of Jaw-Thrust Technique by Both Hands for Adults.成人双手两步提颌法放置柔性喉罩气道的前瞻性随机研究。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Mar;75(1):32-38. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03099-w. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
8
A prospective randomized study for the placement of flexible laryngeal airway mask with two-step jaw-thrust technique by both hands for adults.一项针对成人采用双手两步提颌法放置柔性喉罩气道的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Feb 15;14(2):1060-1067. eCollection 2022.
9
Effects of Passive Head-and-Neck Movements on the Performance of i-gel Supraglottic Airway Device in Anesthetized Patients - A Randomized Crossover Trial.被动头颈运动对麻醉患者使用i-gel声门上气道装置性能的影响——一项随机交叉试验
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Apr-Jun;14(2):305-311. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_73_20. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
10
Influence of head and neck positions on oropharyngeal seal pressure with Baska mask versus I-gel™; A randomised clinical study.使用巴斯卡面罩与I-gel™面罩时头颈部位置对口咽密封压力的影响:一项随机临床研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Aug;64(8):675-680. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_185_20. Epub 2020 Jul 31.