Suppr超能文献

新型模拟板球击球回合(BATEX)中的运动模式和身体疲劳。

Movement patterns and physical strain during a novel, simulated cricket batting innings (BATEX).

机构信息

School of Sport, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2011 May;29(8):801-9. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2011.560174.

Abstract

A simulated cricket batting innings was developed to replicate the physical demands of scoring a century during One-Day International cricket. The simulated innings requires running-between-the-wickets across six 5-over stages, each of 21 min duration. To validate whether the simulated batting innings is reflective of One-Day International batting, movement patterns were collected using a global positioning system (GPS) and compared with previous research. In addition, indicators of physical strain were recorded (heart rate, jump heights, sweat loss, tympanic temperature). Nine club cricketers (mean ± s: age 20 ± 3 years; body mass 79.5 ± 7.9 kg) performed the simulated innings outdoors. There was a moderate trend for distance covered in the simulated innings to be less than that during One-Day batting (2171 ± 157 vs. 2476 ± 631 m · h⁻¹; effect size = 0.78). This difference was largely explained by a strong trend for less distance covered walking in the simulated innings than in One-Day batting (1359 ± 157 vs. 1604 ± 438 m · h⁻¹; effect size = 1.61). However, there was a marked trend for distance covered both striding and sprinting to be greater in the simulated innings than in One-Day batting (effect size > 1.2). Practically, the simulated batting innings may be used for match-realistic physical training and as a research protocol to assess the demands of prolonged, high-intensity cricket batting.

摘要

一个模拟板球击球回合被开发出来,以复制在一日国际板球比赛中得分百分的身体需求。模拟回合需要在六个 5 局阶段之间跑板,每个阶段持续 21 分钟。为了验证模拟击球回合是否反映了一日国际板球击球,使用全球定位系统(GPS)收集运动模式,并与以前的研究进行比较。此外,还记录了身体疲劳的指标(心率、跳跃高度、汗水流失、鼓膜温度)。九名俱乐部板球运动员(平均 ± s:年龄 20 ± 3 岁;体重 79.5 ± 7.9 公斤)在户外进行了模拟击球回合。模拟击球回合中覆盖的距离明显小于一日国际击球(2171 ± 157 比 2476 ± 631 m·h⁻¹;效应大小 = 0.78)。这一差异主要归因于模拟击球回合中步行距离明显小于一日国际击球(1359 ± 157 比 1604 ± 438 m·h⁻¹;效应大小 = 1.61)。然而,在模拟击球回合中,跨步和冲刺的覆盖距离明显大于一日国际击球(效应大小 > 1.2)。实际上,模拟击球回合可用于比赛逼真的体能训练,也可作为研究方案,评估长时间高强度板球击球的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验