Chiong Winston
UC San Francisco, Neurology, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Neurocase. 2011 Jun;17(3):190-200. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2010.532808.
Neuroscientists have recently begun to explore topics, such as the nature of the self, that were previously considered problems for philosophy rather than for science. This article aims to provide a starting point for interdisciplinary exchange by reviewing three philosophical debates about the nature of the self in light of contemporary work in cognitive neuroscience. Continental rationalist and British empiricist approaches to the unity of the self are discussed in relation to earlier work on split-brain patients, and to more recent work on "mental time travel" and the default mode network; the phenomenological movement, and the central concept of intentionality, are discussed in relation to interoceptive accounts of emotion and to the mirror neuron system; and ongoing philosophical debates about agency and autonomy are discussed in relation to recent work on action awareness and on insight in clinical populations such as addicts and patients with frontotemporal dementia.
神经科学家们最近开始探索诸如自我本质等话题,这些话题以前被认为是哲学问题而非科学问题。本文旨在通过根据当代认知神经科学的研究成果回顾三场关于自我本质的哲学辩论,为跨学科交流提供一个起点。大陆理性主义和英国经验主义对自我统一性的探讨,与早期关于裂脑患者的研究以及近期关于“心理时间旅行”和默认模式网络的研究相关;现象学运动以及意向性的核心概念,与情感的内感受性解释以及镜像神经元系统相关;关于能动性和自主性的持续哲学辩论,与近期关于行动意识以及成瘾者和额颞叶痴呆患者等临床群体的洞察力的研究相关。