Skrabal Maryann Z, Jones Rhonda M, Walters Ryan W, Nemire Ruth E, Soltis Denise A, Kahaleh Abby A, Hritcko Philip M, Boyle Cynthia J, Assemi Mitra, Turner Paul D
Office of Experiential Education, Creighton University School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Omaha, NE, USA.
J Pharm Pract. 2010 Jun;23(3):265-72. doi: 10.1177/0897190010366927. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
To survey volunteer pharmacy preceptors regarding experiential education and determine whether differences in responses relate to such factors as geographic region, practice setting, and population density.
An online survey was sent to 4396 volunteer experiential preceptors. The survey consisted of 41 questions asking the preceptor to comment on the experiential education environment. Experiential education administrators from 9 schools of pharmacy administered the survey to their volunteer preceptors in all regions (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West) of the United States, in various pharmacy practice settings, and areas of differing population densities.
A total of 1163 (26.5%) preceptors responded. Regionally, preceptors in the West disagreed more than those in the Midwest and the South that they had enough time to spend with students to provide a quality experience and also required compensation less often than their counterparts in the Northeast and South. Concerning practice settings, hospital preceptors accepted students from more schools, had greater increases in requests, turned away more students, and spent less time with the students compared to preceptors in other settings. Population density differences reflected that preceptors at urban sites took and turned away more students than those at rural sites. Preceptors from rural areas spent more time with students and felt they were spending enough time with their students to provide quality experiences when compared to other preceptors.
The results of this national volunteer preceptor survey may assist pharmacy school leaders in understanding how location, practice type, and population density affect experiential education, preceptor time-quality issues, and site compensation so they can take necessary actions to improve quality of student practice experiences.
就实践教育对志愿药学带教老师进行调查,并确定回答的差异是否与地理区域、实践环境和人口密度等因素有关。
向4396名志愿实践带教老师发送了在线调查问卷。该调查包括41个问题,要求带教老师对实践教育环境发表评论。来自9所药学院的实践教育管理人员向美国所有地区(东北部、中西部、南部和西部)、不同药学实践环境以及不同人口密度地区的志愿带教老师进行了此项调查。
共有1163名(26.5%)带教老师回复。在区域方面,西部的带教老师比中西部和南部的带教老师更不同意他们有足够时间与学生相处以提供高质量的实践体验,而且与东北部和南部的同行相比,他们要求获得报酬的频率更低。关于实践环境,与其他环境中的带教老师相比,医院带教老师接收来自更多学校的学生,接收的请求增加得更多,拒绝的学生更多,与学生相处的时间更少。人口密度差异表明,城市地区的带教老师接收和拒绝的学生比农村地区的更多。与其他带教老师相比,农村地区的带教老师与学生相处的时间更多,并且认为他们有足够的时间与学生相处以提供高质量的实践体验。
这项全国性志愿带教老师调查的结果可能有助于药学院领导了解地点、实践类型和人口密度如何影响实践教育、带教老师的时间质量问题以及实习地点的报酬情况,以便他们能够采取必要行动来提高学生实践体验的质量。