Department of Medicine, Medical College Kolkata, Calcutta, India.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011 May-Jun;77(3):307-13. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.79700.
Doctors' hands are a common source of bacterial contamination. Often, these organisms are found to be virulent species with multidrug-resistance patterns. These are the sources of nosocomial infections in many patients.
The present study was undertaken to find out the prevalence of bacterial contamination in the hands of doctors in the Medicine and Dermatology wards of a tertiary care hospital.
The hands of 44 doctors were swabbed and cultured at entry to ward and at exit. Then, tap water and alcohol swab wash techniques were used and further swabs were done at each step. Thus, each doctor was sampled four-times for the study. The antibiotic-sensitivity pattern of the organisms was determined by the disc-diffusion method.
There was a significant contamination of the doctors' hands at entry (59.1%) and at exit (90.9%). Overall, Staphylococcus was the predominant organism (59% at entry and 85% at exit); coagulase-negative ones were more prevalent at entry (32%) and coagulase-positive ones were more prevalent at exit (54%). There was no difference in the hand contamination rates of junior and senior doctors. Also, the contamination rates were similar in the Medicine and Dermatology wards. Among the gram negative organisms, Escherichia coli (4.5%), Pseudomonas (4.5%), Enterococci (13.6%) and Klebsiella (9%) were the main ones isolated. Gram negative organisms were significantly more prevalent at exit (P = 0.009) compared with their numbers at entry. Hand washing techniques reduced the contamination rates significantly, 76% with tap water wash and further 16.5% with alcohol swab. The removal rate for both groups of organisms was similar. Also, coagulase-positive and -negative Staphylococci showed equal rates of removal with hand washing (P = 0.9793). The organisms were found to be resistant to most of the commonly used antibiotics; the beta-lactam group was especially largely resistant both for gram positive and gram negative bacteria. Both cheaper ones like cloxacillin (50-100%) and very costly ones like cefepime (100%) were equally vulnerable to resistance. Even newer antibiotics like linezolid and vancomycin showed a significant resistance to Staphylococcus. In gram negative organisms, drugs like ceftazidime and gentamicin showed 100% resistance.
This study shows the high level of contamination of doctors' hands. It emphasizes the need for proper hygienic measures in day to day practice in hospitals to reduce the level of nosocomial infections. Also, it shows that most of the commonly used antibiotics will be ineffective in nosocomial infections.
医生的手是细菌污染的常见来源。这些生物体通常是具有多药耐药模式的毒力物种。这些是许多患者发生医院感染的来源。
本研究旨在调查三级保健医院内科和皮肤科病房医生手部细菌污染的发生率。
在进入病房和离开病房时,对 44 名医生的手部进行拭子和培养。然后,使用自来水和酒精拭子洗涤技术,并在每一步进一步进行拭子采样。因此,每位医生在研究中接受了四次采样。通过圆盘扩散法确定生物体的抗生素敏感性模式。
医生手部在进入时(59.1%)和离开时(90.9%)存在明显污染。总体而言,葡萄球菌是主要的生物体(进入时为 59%,离开时为 85%);凝固酶阴性菌在进入时更为常见(32%),凝固酶阳性菌在离开时更为常见(54%)。初级医生和高级医生的手部污染率没有差异。此外,内科和皮肤科病房的污染率相似。在革兰氏阴性菌中,分离出的主要菌属为大肠杆菌(4.5%)、铜绿假单胞菌(4.5%)、肠球菌(13.6%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(9%)。革兰氏阴性菌在离开时明显比进入时更为常见(P = 0.009)。洗手技术可显著降低污染率,自来水洗涤可降低 76%,酒精拭子进一步降低 16.5%。两组生物体的去除率相似。此外,凝固酶阳性和阴性葡萄球菌的洗手去除率相同(P = 0.9793)。这些生物体对大多数常用抗生素表现出耐药性;β-内酰胺类药物对革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性细菌均具有较高的耐药性。像氯唑西林(50-100%)这样的廉价药物和像头孢吡肟(100%)这样的昂贵药物一样,都容易产生耐药性。即使是新型抗生素如利奈唑胺和万古霉素对葡萄球菌也表现出显著的耐药性。在革兰氏阴性菌中,头孢他啶和庆大霉素等药物显示出 100%的耐药性。
本研究表明医生手部污染程度较高。它强调了在医院日常实践中需要采取适当的卫生措施来降低医院感染水平。此外,它表明大多数常用抗生素在医院感染中无效。