Weber Mark D, Thein-Nissenbaum Jill, Bartlett Lynn, Woodall William R, Reinking Mark F, Wallmann Harvey W, Mulligan Edward P
N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Aug;4(3):110-22.
The primary purpose of this study was to revalidate the competencies that define the practice of sports physical therapy. Additionally, the study allowed for the comparison of responses of board certified specialists in sports physical therapy to respondents who were not specialists.
A survey instrument based the on American Board of Physical Therapy Specialties practice analysis template and The Guide to Physical Therapist Practice was developed by the Sports Specialty Council and a panel of subject matter experts in sports physical therapy. The instrument was sent to 630 physical therapists, 315 of whom were board certified specialists in sports physical therapy and 315 of whom were randomly selected members of the Sports Physical Therapy Section who were not board certified specialists in sports physical therapy. Two hundred and thirty seven subjects returned completed surveys for a 41% response rate. One hundred and fifty eight respondents were sports specialists
The survey results were reviewed by the Sports Specialty Council and another panel of subject matter experts. Using a defined decision making process, the results were used to determine the competencies that define the specialty practice of sports physical therapy. Survey results were also used to develop the sports physical therapy specialty board examination blue print. A number of significant comparisons between the specialists and non-specialists were identified.
The competency revalidation process culminated in the publication of the Sports Physical Therapy Description of Specialty Practice. This document serves to guide the process related to the attainment and maintenance of the board certified clinical specialist in sports physical therapy.
本研究的主要目的是重新验证界定运动物理治疗实践的能力。此外,该研究还对运动物理治疗认证专家与非专家的回答进行了比较。
运动专业委员会和一组运动物理治疗领域专家根据美国物理治疗专业委员会实践分析模板和《物理治疗师实践指南》开发了一份调查问卷。该问卷被发送给630名物理治疗师,其中315名是运动物理治疗认证专家,315名是从运动物理治疗分会中随机挑选的非运动物理治疗认证专家。237名受试者返回了完整的调查问卷,回复率为41%。158名受访者是运动专家。
运动专业委员会和另一组领域专家对调查结果进行了审查。通过既定的决策过程,结果被用于确定界定运动物理治疗专业实践的能力。调查结果还被用于制定运动物理治疗专业委员会考试蓝图。确定了专家与非专家之间的一些显著差异。
能力重新验证过程最终促成了《运动物理治疗专业实践描述》的发布。该文件有助于指导与获得和维持运动物理治疗认证临床专家相关的过程。