Sumantran Venil N
Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)-Chennai, 201, Bhupat & Jyothi Mehta School of Biosciences Chennai, Tamil Nadu, Chennai, India.
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;731:219-36. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-080-5_19.
Data on cell viability have long been obtained from in vitro cytotoxicity assays. Today, there is a focus on markers of cell death, and the MTT cell survival assay is widely used for measuring cytotoxic potential of a compound. However, a comprehensive evaluation of cytotoxicity requires additional assays which -measure short and long-term cytotoxicity. Assays which measure the cytostatic effects of compounds are not less important, particularly for newer anticancer agents. This overview discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different non-clonogenic assays for measuring short and medium-term cytotoxicity. It also discusses clonogenic assays, which accurately measure long-term cytostatic effects of drugs and toxic agents. For certain compounds and cell types, the advent of high throughput, multiparameter, cytotoxicity assays, and gene expression assays have made it possible to predict cytotoxic potency in vivo.
长期以来,细胞活力数据一直是通过体外细胞毒性试验获得的。如今,人们关注细胞死亡的标志物,MTT细胞存活试验被广泛用于测量化合物的细胞毒性潜力。然而,对细胞毒性进行全面评估需要额外的试验来测量短期和长期细胞毒性。测量化合物细胞生长抑制作用的试验同样重要,特别是对于新型抗癌药物。本综述讨论了用于测量短期和中期细胞毒性的不同非克隆形成试验的优缺点。还讨论了克隆形成试验,其可准确测量药物和有毒剂的长期细胞生长抑制作用。对于某些化合物和细胞类型,高通量、多参数细胞毒性试验和基因表达试验的出现使得预测体内细胞毒性效力成为可能。