Suppr超能文献

长效β-激动剂的安全使用:我们学到了什么?

Safe use of long-acting β-agonists: what have we learnt?

机构信息

McMaster University, Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 4A6, Canada.

出版信息

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2011 Sep;10(5):767-78. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2011.579900. Epub 2011 Apr 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Long-acting β-agonists (LABAs) added to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) reduce symptoms, improve lung function and enhance overall asthma control. However, several studies have indicated an increased risk of asthma mortality and asthma-related serious adverse events and the FDA recently mandated restrictions to the use of LABAs in asthma.

AREAS COVERED

This review highlights the clinical studies on which safety analyses pertaining to salmeterol and formoterol have been based and then focuses on recent meta-analyses of safety outcomes with and without consideration of concomitant ICS.

EXPERT OPINION

The phenomenon of masking of inflammation by LABA if ICS dose is insufficient underscores the potential for confounding in determining real safety risks. Under-treatment with ICS and differential dosing of ICS in many trials are major factors driving the LABA safety concern. The FDA meta-analysis, when stratified for mandatory ICS use, found no significant increase in the composite outcome of asthma mortality, intubations and hospitalizations. Add-on therapy with LABA is effective and safe if the dose of ICS is adequate to treat airway inflammation. LABA and ICS given in a single device will negate the possibility of LABA monotherapy which is contraindicated. The FDA has recommended that LABAs be withdrawn when control is achieved with combination therapy but recent evidence suggests this may result in loss of symptom control.

摘要

简介

长效β-激动剂(LABA)与吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)联合应用可减轻症状、改善肺功能并增强哮喘整体控制。然而,一些研究表明 LABA 可能会增加哮喘死亡率和哮喘相关严重不良事件的风险,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)最近对 LABA 在哮喘中的应用进行了限制。

涵盖领域

本文综述了基于沙美特罗和福莫特罗安全性分析的临床研究,并重点关注了最近关于 LABA 安全性结果的meta 分析,这些分析考虑了或未考虑同时使用 ICS。

专家意见

如果 ICS 剂量不足,LABA 掩盖炎症的现象突出了在确定真实安全风险时存在混杂的可能性。ICS 治疗不足和许多试验中 ICS 的差异剂量是驱动 LABA 安全性担忧的主要因素。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的 meta 分析发现,在分层考虑强制性 ICS 使用的情况下,哮喘死亡率、插管和住院的复合结局没有显著增加。如果 ICS 剂量足以治疗气道炎症,那么 LABA 的附加治疗是有效且安全的。在单一装置中给予 LABA 和 ICS 将消除 LABA 单药治疗的可能性,因为 LABA 单药治疗是禁忌的。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)建议在联合治疗实现控制时停用 LABA,但最近的证据表明,这可能导致症状控制的丧失。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验