Cazzola Mario, Matera Maria Gabriella
Unit of Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, Rome, Italy.
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2007 Oct;1(1):35-46. doi: 10.1177/1753465807081747.
Several studies suggested an association between the regular use of beta2-agonists and asthma deaths. Whether this association represents adverse effects of beta -agonist use or is entirely due to disease severity is a matter of ongoing debate. Previous literature indicates that confounding by poor asthma control may explain the apparent deleterious effects of inhaled beta2-agonists. Tolerance to nonbronchodilator effects of beta2-agonists may account for the increase in reactivity to indirect bronchoconstrictor challenges and explain why some studies have demonstrated enhanced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma after regular beta 2-agonist therapy. Nonetheless, the salmeterol multi-centre asthma research trial (SMART) found more asthma deaths (13 vs 3) and life-threatening asthma events (37 vs 22) in the salmeterol-treated asthmatic patients, although it was documented that among African-Americans, 5 times as many deaths and near-deaths from asthma occurred in those given salmeterol than in those given placebo, and among patients with asthma not using an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as a preventive (controller) medication, again more deaths and near-deaths from asthma occurred in those given salmeterol than in those given placebo. Only 38% of the African-Americans who participated in the study used an ICS. As a result of the findings from the SMART, FDA issued a public health advisory to highlight that long-acting beta2-agonists (LABAs) should not be the first medicine used to treat asthma. LABAs should be added to the asthma treatment plan only if other medicines, including the use of low-or-medium dose ICSs, do not control asthma. However, despite all of the concerns raised by the SMART, inhaled beta2-agonists remain the most effective bronchodilators available for the immediate relief of asthma symptoms and, as such, remain an important component of asthma management. Obviously, there are concerns about LABA treatment as monotherapy for asthma. Patients with asthma should be initiated and maintained on sufficiently high doses of ICSs and only patients whose asthma cannot be controlled should receive additional LABAs on a regular basis.
多项研究表明,规律使用β2受体激动剂与哮喘死亡之间存在关联。这种关联是代表β2受体激动剂使用的不良反应,还是完全归因于疾病严重程度,仍是一个持续争论的问题。既往文献表明,哮喘控制不佳造成的混杂因素可能解释了吸入性β2受体激动剂明显的有害作用。对β2受体激动剂非支气管扩张作用的耐受性可能导致对间接支气管收缩刺激的反应性增加,并解释了为何一些研究显示,在规律使用β2受体激动剂治疗后,哮喘患者出现了支气管收缩增强的情况。尽管如此,沙美特罗多中心哮喘研究试验(SMART)发现,在接受沙美特罗治疗的哮喘患者中,哮喘死亡(13例 vs 3例)和危及生命的哮喘事件(37例 vs 22例)更多,尽管有记录表明,在非裔美国人中,接受沙美特罗治疗的患者哮喘死亡和濒死发生率是接受安慰剂治疗者的5倍,且在未使用吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)作为预防性(控制)药物的哮喘患者中,接受沙美特罗治疗的患者哮喘死亡和濒死发生率同样高于接受安慰剂治疗者。参与该研究的非裔美国人中只有38%使用了ICS。基于SMART的研究结果,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发布了一份公共卫生咨询报告,强调长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)不应作为治疗哮喘的首选药物。只有在包括使用低剂量或中等剂量ICS在内的其他药物无法控制哮喘时,才应将LABA添加到哮喘治疗方案中。然而,尽管SMART引发了诸多担忧,但吸入性β2受体激动剂仍然是可用于立即缓解哮喘症状的最有效支气管扩张剂,因此仍是哮喘管理的重要组成部分。显然,人们对LABA单药治疗哮喘存在担忧。哮喘患者应起始并维持使用足够高剂量的ICS,只有哮喘无法得到控制的患者才应定期额外接受LABA治疗。