• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耳鼻喉科学能否在影响因子方面与更大的领域竞争?:基于百分位的影响因子是解决方案吗?

Can otolaryngology compete with larger fields regarding impact factor?: is percentile-based impact factor a solution?

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jul;145(1):15-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599811406648. Epub 2011 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1177/0194599811406648
PMID:21521899
Abstract

Impact factor (IF) consists of reporting the number of references an average article in a given journal receives over a 2-year period. Despite several valid criticisms, IF has become an important component of academic advancement. The authors sought to investigate the possible relationship between size of specialty field and IF. The top 10 journals of 13 specialty fields were selected based on IF as reported by Journal Citations Reports on the Web of Science. Specialty field population was obtained from the American Board of Medical Specialties. A highly positive correlation (r = 0.9) was noted with smaller fields (eg, otolaryngology) having lower IFs. To overcome this population bias, a percentile-based impact factor (PIF) may be used where the top journal within a field is given 100%, the worst 0%, and all other journals' IFs are proportionately scaled in between the 2 extremes. PIF acts to "level the playing field," allowing between-specialty field comparisons.

摘要

影响因子(IF)的计算方法是,统计某一特定期刊在过去两年内发表的文章的平均被引次数。尽管存在一些合理的批评,但 IF 已经成为学术发展的重要组成部分。作者试图研究专业领域规模与 IF 之间可能存在的关系。根据 Web of Science 上 Journal Citations Reports 报告的 IF,选择了 13 个专业领域排名前 10 的期刊。专业领域的规模从美国医学专业委员会获得。研究发现,领域越小(例如耳鼻喉科),IF 越低,相关性非常高(r = 0.9)。为了克服这种人口偏见,可以使用基于百分位的影响因子(PIF),其中该领域排名最高的期刊得 100%,排名最差的得 0%,其他期刊的 IF 则在这两个极端之间按比例调整。PIF 起到了“公平竞争”的作用,允许在不同专业领域之间进行比较。

相似文献

1
Can otolaryngology compete with larger fields regarding impact factor?: is percentile-based impact factor a solution?耳鼻喉科学能否在影响因子方面与更大的领域竞争?:基于百分位的影响因子是解决方案吗?
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jul;145(1):15-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599811406648. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
2
[Rating and ranking of medical journals: a randomised controlled evaluation of impact factor and number of listed journals].[医学期刊的评级与排名:影响因子及收录期刊数量的随机对照评估]
Klin Padiatr. 2012 Jan;224(1):43-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299726. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
3
Emergency medicine journal impact factor and change compared to other medical and surgical specialties.急诊医学期刊影响因子及其与其他内科和外科专业的变化比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;19(11):1248-54. doi: 10.1111/acem.12017.
4
Effect of bibliographical classification on the impact factor of science- and engineering-based journals.文献分类对理工科类期刊影响因子的作用
Account Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;16(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/08989620802689516.
5
Rating Pakistani medical journals using the principles of citation analysis.运用文献计量分析原理对巴基斯坦医学期刊进行评级。
Health Info Libr J. 2008 Mar;25(1):50-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00727.x.
6
A 9-year analysis of bibliographical trends for journals in the subject category of general and internal medicine.内科和普通医学学科期刊文献趋势的 9 年分析。
Account Res. 2009 May;16(3):127-52. doi: 10.1080/08989620902984080.
7
Subspecialty impact factors: the contribution of pediatric anesthesia and pain articles.亚专业影响因素:儿科麻醉与疼痛文章的贡献
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jan;108(1):105-10. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818f0e89.
8
Psychiatry and the Hirsch h-index: The relationship between journal impact factors and accrued citations.精神病学和 Hirsch h 指数:期刊影响因子与累积引文的关系。
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;18(4):207-19. doi: 10.3109/10673229.2010.493742.
9
Impact of the impact factor in biomedical research: its use and misuse.影响因子在生物医学研究中的作用:其应用与误用
Singapore Med J. 2009 Aug;50(8):752-5.
10
[Comparative studies of thr bibliographic impact of European and American ENT reviews].[欧美耳鼻喉科综述文献影响力的比较研究]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1990;44(4):461-4.