Burkhalter Carmen L, Blalock Lindsay, Herring Heather, Skaar Denell
University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jun;75(6):801-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.03.011. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
In order for children with hearing impairment to receive maximum benefit from preschool programs, their amplification devices must be functioning appropriately. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to investigate the functionality of hearing aids in a preschool setting.
Forty-four hearing aids worn by 24 preschool children, whose ages ranged from three to five years, (mean age=45.2 months, median age=48 months) from four state funded aural/oral habilitation preschools were evaluated using listening checks and visual examinations. Hearing aids passing both evaluations were given a pass rating and those failing one or more of the evaluations were given a fail rating. Causes of fail rates were documented.
Over half of the hearing aids tested were determined to have at least one or more problems (n=27). These problems were detected using listening and visual checks.
Failure rates based on basic listening and visual checks among the hearing aids examined in this study demonstrated no improvement over those reported in the 1970's. The results re-emphasize the need for a national dialogue on this topic.
为了让听力受损儿童从学前教育项目中获得最大益处,他们的放大装置必须正常运行。因此,本研究的目的是调查助听器在学前教育环境中的功能。
对来自四所州立资助的听觉/口语康复幼儿园的24名学龄前儿童佩戴的44台助听器进行了评估,这些儿童年龄在3至5岁之间(平均年龄=45.2个月,中位年龄=48个月),评估采用听力检查和视觉检查。两项评估均通过的助听器获得通过评级,一项或多项评估未通过的助听器获得失败评级。记录失败率的原因。
超过一半的测试助听器被确定至少有一个或多个问题(n=27)。这些问题是通过听力和视觉检查发现的。
本研究中接受检查的助听器基于基本听力和视觉检查的故障率与20世纪70年代报告的故障率相比没有改善。结果再次强调了就这一主题进行全国性对话的必要性。