• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 IOI-HA 助听器适配结果相关的因素。

Factors associated with hearing aid fitting outcomes on the IOI-HA.

机构信息

The University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Communication Disability Centre, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2010 Aug;49(8):586-95. doi: 10.3109/14992021003777259.

DOI:10.3109/14992021003777259
PMID:20515423
Abstract

A hallmark of quality clinical practice in audiology should be the ongoing measurement of outcomes in order to improve practice. The aims of this study were to describe outcomes for a large sample of clients fitted with hearing aids and to investigate factors associated with mean IOI-HA scores, with a view to providing guidance about factors that warrant particular attention in the clinic in order to improve outcomes. Measures used were the international outcome inventory - hearing aids (IOI-HA; Cox & Alexander, 2002 ) and a series of questions about satisfaction with hearing aid performance in different listening situations, hearing aid attributes, and clinical service. The participant sample consisted of 1653 adults, most often fitted bilaterally (78%); 81% had digital aids with at least two listening programs. Results of the regression analysis indicated that there were a number of significant factors that, in total, explained 57% of the variance in IOI-HA scores. Higher mean IOI-HA scores were most strongly associated with greater satisfaction with hearing aid attributes of aid fit/comfort, clarity of tone and sound, and comfort with loud sounds and with satisfaction in the listening situations of conversation with one person, in small groups, in large groups, and outdoors. These findings highlight the importance of focusing rehabilitation on improving satisfaction with aided listening across a range of environments and with key attributes of hearing aid performance.

摘要

在听力学中,临床实践质量的一个标志应该是持续衡量结果,以改善实践。本研究的目的是描述大量佩戴助听器的客户的结果,并研究与平均 IOI-HA 评分相关的因素,以期就需要在临床中特别关注的因素提供指导,以改善结果。使用的测量工具是国际结果清单-助听器(IOI-HA;Cox 和 Alexander,2002)以及一系列关于在不同听力环境下对助听器性能、助听器属性和临床服务的满意度问题。参与者样本包括 1653 名成年人,大多数是双侧(78%);81%的人配备了至少有两个听力程序的数字助听器。回归分析的结果表明,有许多显著的因素,总共解释了 IOI-HA 评分方差的 57%。更高的平均 IOI-HA 评分与对助听器属性(佩戴舒适性/舒适度、音调清晰度和声音舒适度)和对大声的舒适度以及在单人对话、小团体、大团体和户外等听力环境中的满意度有更强的关联。这些发现强调了将康复重点放在改善在各种环境下的助听满意度和助听器性能的关键属性上的重要性。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with hearing aid fitting outcomes on the IOI-HA.与 IOI-HA 助听器适配结果相关的因素。
Int J Audiol. 2010 Aug;49(8):586-95. doi: 10.3109/14992021003777259.
2
Age-related use and benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid compact.骨锚式紧凑型助听器的年龄相关使用情况及益处。
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Sep;30(6):787-92. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b120ea.
3
International outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): results from the Chinese version.国际助听器结局量表(IOI-HA)中文版测试结果。
Int J Audiol. 2011 Oct;50(10):673-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.588966.
4
Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.成人助听器使用者使用丹麦语和非语义语音材料的可接受噪声级(ANL)。
Int J Audiol. 2012 Sep;51(9):678-88. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.692822. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
5
Hearing aid outcomes: effects of gender and experience on patients' use and satisfaction.助听器效果:性别和经验对患者使用情况及满意度的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Jul-Aug;20(7):422-32; quiz 459-60. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.7.4.
6
BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.单侧或双侧传导性听力损失儿童及青少年的骨锚式助听器:疗效研究
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Jan;71(1):135-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.09.014. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
7
Fit to targets, preferred listening levels, and self-reported outcomes for the DSL v5.0 a hearing aid prescription for adults.适用于目标、首选聆听水平和自我报告结果的 DSL v5.0 成人助听器处方。
Int J Audiol. 2010 Aug;49(8):550-60. doi: 10.3109/14992021003713122.
8
Measuring outcomes of a communication program for older people with hearing impairment using the International Outcome Inventory.使用国际成果量表评估针对老年听力障碍患者的沟通项目成果。
Int J Audiol. 2006 Apr;45(4):238-46. doi: 10.1080/14992020500429625.
9
The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.性能-感知测试(PPT)及其与助听器报告的听力障碍和助听器满意度的关系。
Ear Hear. 2006 Jun;27(3):229-42. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000215976.64444.e6.
10
Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.个性、听力问题与放大特性:对助听器自我报告结果的影响因素
Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2):141-62. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803126a4.

引用本文的文献

1
French Adaptation and Validation of the International Outcome Inventory on Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) Questionnaire.《国际助听器效果问卷(IOI-HA)的法语改编与验证》
Audiol Res. 2025 Aug 6;15(4):97. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15040097.
2
Some Considerations for the Use of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) as a Hearing-Aid Outcome Measure.关于使用助听器受益简表(APHAB)作为助听器效果评估指标的一些考量
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251359755. doi: 10.1177/23312165251359755. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
3
Community-based adult hearing care provided by community healthcare workers using mHealth technologies.
社区卫生工作者利用移动医疗技术提供的基于社区的成人听力保健。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2095784. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2095784.
4
Effects of demographic, audiologic, and hearing-aid-related variables on the outcomes of using hearing aids.使用助听器的效果受人口统计学、听力学和助听器相关变量的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Aug;279(8):3857-3865. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07126-4. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
5
Factors associated with the efficiency of hearing aids for patients with age-related hearing loss.与年龄相关性听力损失患者助听器效率相关的因素。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Feb 26;14:485-492. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S190651. eCollection 2019.
6
Self-Reported Benefit and Satisfaction with a Beamforming Body-Worn Hearing Aid for Elderly Adults.老年人对波束形成式可穿戴助听器的自我报告益处及满意度
Int J Otolaryngol. 2018 Nov 1;2018:2046894. doi: 10.1155/2018/2046894. eCollection 2018.
7
Potential Consequences of Spectral and Binaural Loudness Summation for Bilateral Hearing Aid Fitting.双耳助听双侧配适中频谱和双耳响度叠加的潜在影响。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518805690. doi: 10.1177/2331216518805690.
8
Do Hearing Aids Address Real-World Hearing Difficulties for Adults With Mild Hearing Impairment? Results From a Pilot Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.助听器能否解决轻度听力障碍成年人在实际生活中遇到的听力问题?使用生态瞬时评估的初步研究结果。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518783608. doi: 10.1177/2331216518783608.
9
Preferred Compression Threshold and Release Time in Quiet and Noisy Conditions for Elderly Korean Hearing Aid Users.韩国老年助听器使用者在安静和嘈杂环境中的最佳压缩阈值及释放时间
J Audiol Otol. 2017 Sep;21(3):133-139. doi: 10.7874/jao.2017.00066. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
10
An in-situ calibration method and the effects on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.一种原位校准方法及其对刺激频率耳声发射的影响。
Biomed Eng Online. 2014 Jul 8;13:95. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-95.