• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听力损失儿童的怀疑、识别、放大和干预年龄。

The ages of suspicion, identification, amplification and intervention in children with hearing loss.

作者信息

Ozcebe Esra, Sevinc Sebnem, Belgin Erol

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara 06100, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Aug;69(8):1081-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.002. Epub 2005 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.002
PMID:16005351
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the ages of suspicion, identification, amplification and intervention in children with hearing loss.

METHODS

In the first stage of the study, we determined the ages of parental suspicion, identification, amplification and intervention in children with hearing loss who were referred to our center between years 1999 and 2004. The data of 199 children with severe to profound hearing loss was analyzed retrospectively. Based on these data, the intervals of suspicion and identification, identification and amplification and amplification and intervention were calculated. In the second stage of study, the data obtained from 156 children with severe to profound hearing loss, who were followed at our center between years 1991 and 1994, was compared to the data obtained in the first stage of study. Data were collected from family questionnaire-based interviews and hospital records.

RESULTS

In the first stage of the study, parents reported that hearing loss was suspected at a mean age of 12.5 months. The average ages of identification, amplification and intervention were 19.4; 26.5 and 33.0 months, respectively. The results obtained from the second stage of this study revealed that, ages of suspicion, identification and intervention were significantly smaller for the period of 1999-2004, compared to the period of 1991-1994.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study clearly demonstrate that, in Turkey, there are significant improvements in the ages of suspicion, identification and intervention of hearing loss. Even though these improvements are remarkable, the ages of suspicion, identification, amplification and intervention of hearing loss are still far beyond the suggested ages by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定听力损失儿童的可疑年龄、确诊年龄、佩戴助听器年龄及干预年龄。

方法

在研究的第一阶段,我们确定了1999年至2004年间转诊至本中心的听力损失儿童的家长可疑年龄、确诊年龄、佩戴助听器年龄及干预年龄。对199例重度至极重度听力损失儿童的数据进行回顾性分析。基于这些数据,计算可疑与确诊、确诊与佩戴助听器、佩戴助听器与干预之间的时间间隔。在研究的第二阶段,将1991年至1994年间在本中心随访的156例重度至极重度听力损失儿童的数据与第一阶段研究获得的数据进行比较。数据通过基于家庭问卷的访谈和医院记录收集。

结果

在研究的第一阶段,家长报告听力损失可疑的平均年龄为12.5个月。确诊、佩戴助听器及干预的平均年龄分别为19.4个月、26.5个月和33.0个月。本研究第二阶段获得的结果显示,与1991 - 1994年期间相比,1999 - 2004年期间的可疑、确诊及干预年龄显著更小。

结论

本研究结果清楚地表明,在土耳其,听力损失的可疑、确诊及干预年龄有显著改善。尽管这些改善很显著,但听力损失的可疑、确诊、佩戴助听器及干预年龄仍远高于婴儿听力联合委员会建议的年龄。

相似文献

1
The ages of suspicion, identification, amplification and intervention in children with hearing loss.听力损失儿童的怀疑、识别、放大和干预年龄。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Aug;69(8):1081-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.002. Epub 2005 Apr 9.
2
The ages of suspicion, diagnosis, amplification, and intervention in deaf children.聋儿的疑似、诊断、病情加重及干预年龄。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Jan;71(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.08.014. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
3
A case study of an emerging community-based early hearing detection and intervention program: part I. Parents' compliance.一个新兴的基于社区的早期听力检测与干预项目的案例研究:第一部分。家长的依从性。
Am J Audiol. 2006 Jun;15(1):25-32. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2006/004).
4
Infant hearing loss in South Africa: age of intervention and parental needs for support.南非的婴儿听力损失:干预年龄及家长的支持需求
Int J Audiol. 2008;47 Suppl 1:S30-5. doi: 10.1080/14992020802286210.
5
[Analysis of reasons for late diagnosis of hearing impairment in children].[儿童听力障碍延迟诊断的原因分析]
Med Pregl. 2008;61 Suppl 2:21-5.
6
Trends in age of identification and intervention in infants with hearing loss.听力损失婴儿的识别与干预年龄趋势。
Ear Hear. 2003 Feb;24(1):89-95. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000051749.40991.1F.
7
Early hearing detection and intervention in children with prelingual deafness, effects on language development.语前聋儿童的早期听力检测与干预及其对语言发育的影响
Minerva Pediatr. 2007 Aug;59(4):307-13.
8
A pilot project on hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening: lessons learned.一项基于医院的新生儿听力普遍筛查试点项目:经验教训
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 May;70(5):843-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.09.018. Epub 2005 Oct 24.
9
Population-based assessments of ophthalmologic and audiologic follow-up in children with very low birth weight enrolled in Medicaid: a quality-of-care study.对参加医疗补助计划的极低出生体重儿童进行眼科和听力随访的基于人群的评估:一项医疗质量研究。
Pediatrics. 2008 Feb;121(2):e278-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0136.
10
Age at diagnosis of deaf babies: a retrospective analysis highlighting the advantage of newborn hearing screening.聋儿的诊断年龄:一项强调新生儿听力筛查优势的回顾性分析。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Jul;70(7):1283-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.01.008. Epub 2006 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Socio-Economic Status and Language Development in Hearing Loss: A Critical Appraisal.听力损失中的社会经济地位与语言发展:批判性评估
Audiol Res. 2023 Feb 14;13(1):151-159. doi: 10.3390/audiolres13010015.
2
Institutional Analysis of the Surgical Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Deprived Population.贫困人群人工耳蜗植入手术结果的机构分析
Cureus. 2022 Nov 24;14(11):e31853. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31853. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Knowledge and Attitudes of Pacific Islander Doctors and Medical Students to Childhood Hearing Loss and Hearing Services: Results of a Structured Questionnaire Survey in SAMOA.
太平洋岛民医生和医学生对儿童听力损失及听力服务的认知与态度:萨摩亚一项结构化问卷调查的结果
Glob Pediatr Health. 2022 Sep 21;9:2333794X221126079. doi: 10.1177/2333794X221126079. eCollection 2022.
4
Knowledge and attitudes of university health students in the Pacific Islands towards childhood hearing loss and hearing services: a Samoan survey study protocol.太平洋岛屿大学生对儿童听力损失和听力服务的知识和态度:一项萨摩亚调查研究方案。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2021 Mar 9;5(1):e000998. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000998. eCollection 2021.
5
Age at onset of training in children with hearing and speech disorders and the analysis of related factors in Turkey.土耳其听障和言语障碍儿童的训练起始年龄及相关因素分析。
Ital J Pediatr. 2019 Oct 15;45(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13052-019-0723-x.
6
Satisfaction with Life among Mothers of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidates: The Impact of Implant Operation and Sociodemographic Factors.小儿人工耳蜗植入候选者母亲的生活满意度:植入手术及社会人口学因素的影响
J Int Adv Otol. 2018 Aug;14(2):202-207. doi: 10.5152/iao.2018.5531.
7
The follow-up results of newborn hearing screening of Gaziosmanpasa Taksim Research and Training Hospital.加济奥斯曼帕夏塔克西姆研究与培训医院新生儿听力筛查的随访结果
Turk Pediatri Ars. 2018 Mar 1;53(1):10-16. doi: 10.5152/TurkPediatriArs.2018.5389. eCollection 2018 Mar.
8
Newborn hearing screening outcomes during the first decade of the program in a reference hospital from Turkey.土耳其一家参考医院在该项目开展的头十年期间的新生儿听力筛查结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 May;273(5):1143-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3654-1. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
9
Effects of parental education level and economic status on the needs of families of hearing-impaired children in the aural rehabilitation program.父母教育水平和经济状况对听力障碍儿童家庭在听觉康复项目中的需求的影响。
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Winter;25(70):41-8.
10
Effects of parents' level of education and economic status on the age at cochlear implantation in children.父母教育水平和经济状况对儿童人工耳蜗植入年龄的影响。
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Winter;24(66):7-15.