Unit of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Cordoba University, E-14004 Cordoba, Spain.
Hum Pathol. 2011 Nov;42(11):1653-9. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.12.024. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
We present the clinicopathologic and immunonohistochemical features of 25 cases of flat urothelial carcinoma in situ with glandular differentiation. Previously, cases on this category have been reported as in situ adenocarcinoma (a term not currently preferred). Fourteen of 25 cases had concurrent conventional urothelial carcinoma in situ. Five of the cases were primary carcinoma in situ with glandular differentiation; twenty cases of secondary carcinoma in situ with glandular differentiation were associated with urothelial carcinoma alone (n = 11) or with glandular differentiation (n = 7), discohesive (n = 1) or micropapillary carcinoma (n = 1). The individual tumor cells were columnar. The architectural pattern of the carcinoma in situ with glandular differentiation consisted of 1 or more papillary, flat or cribriform glandular patterns. Univariate statistical analysis showed no survival differences between urothelial carcinoma in situ with glandular differentiation and conventional urothelial carcinoma in situ (log-rank 0.810; P = .368). Carcinoma in situ with glandular differentiation showed high ki-67 index and p53 accumulation, high nuclear and cytoplasmic p16 expression and diffuse PTEN expression, a phenotype that also characterized concurrent conventional carcinoma in situ. MUC5A, MUC2, CK20, and c-erbB2 were positive in all 25 cases of urothelial carcinoma in situ with glandular differentiation, and CDX-2 was present in 19 cases; MUC1, CK7, or 34βE12 was focally present in 21, 19, and 18 cases, respectively. MUC1core was negative in all cases. We concluded that urothelial carcinoma in situ with glandular differentiation is a variant of carcinoma in situ that follows the natural history of conventional urothelial carcinoma in situ. The immunophenotype suggests urothelial origin with the expression of MUC5A and CDX2 as signature for glandular differentiation.
我们介绍了 25 例具有腺样分化的扁平原位尿路上皮癌的临床病理和免疫组织化学特征。此前,此类病例曾被报道为原位腺癌(目前不推荐使用的术语)。25 例中有 14 例同时伴有传统的原位尿路上皮癌。5 例为原发性具有腺样分化的原位癌;20 例具有腺样分化的继发性原位癌与单纯尿路上皮癌相关(n=11)或与腺样分化相关(n=7)、弥漫性(n=1)或微乳头状癌(n=1)相关。单个肿瘤细胞呈柱状。具有腺样分化的原位癌的结构模式包括 1 种或多种乳头状、扁平或筛状的腺样模式。单因素统计分析显示,具有腺样分化的尿路上皮癌与传统的尿路上皮癌原位癌之间无生存差异(对数秩检验 0.810;P=0.368)。具有腺样分化的原位癌具有较高的 Ki-67 指数和 p53 蓄积、高核和细胞质 p16 表达以及弥漫性 PTEN 表达,这种表型也特征性地存在于同时存在的传统原位癌中。MUC5A、MUC2、CK20 和 c-erbB2 在 25 例具有腺样分化的尿路上皮癌原位癌中均为阳性,CDX-2 存在于 19 例中;MUC1、CK7 或 34βE12 分别在 21、19 和 18 例中呈局灶性表达。MUC1core 在所有病例中均为阴性。我们得出结论,具有腺样分化的尿路上皮癌原位癌是一种原位癌变体,遵循传统的尿路上皮癌原位癌的自然史。免疫表型提示为尿路上皮起源,MUC5A 和 CDX2 的表达为腺样分化的特征。