Department of Urology, Daejeon Eulji University Hospital, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon 35233, Republic of Korea.
Department of Pathology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu-si 11759, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 6;59(9):1609. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091609.
: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic roles of various immunohistochemical (IHC) markers in urothelial carcinoma in situ (uCIS) through a meta-analysis and review of diagnostic test accuracy. : The IHC markers CK20, CD44, AMACR, and p53 were evaluated in the present study. We analyzed the expression rates of the IHC markers and compared their diagnostic accuracies. : The estimated expression rates were 0.803 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.726-0.862), 0.142 (95% CI: 0.033-0.449), 0.824 (95% CI: 0.720-0.895), and 0.600 (95% CI: 0.510-0.683) for CK20, CD44, AMACR, and p53, respectively. In the comparison between uCIS and reactive/normal urothelium, the expression of CK20, AMACR, and p53 in uCIS was significantly higher than in reactive/normal urothelium. CD44 showed significantly lower expression in uCIS than in the reactive/normal urothelium. Among the markers, AMACR had the highest sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio. The AUC on SROC was the highest for CK20. : In conclusion, IHC markers, such as CK20, CD44, AMACR, and p53, can be useful in differentiating uCIS from reactive/normal urothelium.
本研究旨在通过荟萃分析和诊断测试准确性评估,评价各种免疫组织化学(IHC)标志物在原位尿路上皮癌(uCIS)中的诊断作用。本研究评估了 CK20、CD44、AMACR 和 p53 这 4 种 IHC 标志物。我们分析了这些 IHC 标志物的表达率,并比较了它们的诊断准确性。CK20、CD44、AMACR 和 p53 的估计表达率分别为 0.803(95%置信区间[CI]:0.726-0.862)、0.142(95%CI:0.033-0.449)、0.824(95%CI:0.720-0.895)和 0.600(95%CI:0.510-0.683)。在 uCIS 与反应性/正常尿路上皮之间的比较中,CK20、AMACR 和 p53 在 uCIS 中的表达明显高于反应性/正常尿路上皮。CD44 在 uCIS 中的表达明显低于反应性/正常尿路上皮。在这些标志物中,AMACR 的敏感性、特异性和诊断优势比最高。SROC 上的 AUC 以 CK20 最高。综上所述,CK20、CD44、AMACR 和 p53 等 IHC 标志物可有助于鉴别 uCIS 与反应性/正常尿路上皮。