Department of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Jun;37(6):854-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.03.006. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) was determined in patients with focal liver lesions (FLLs) in a meta-analysis. Meta-Disc version 1.4 was used to describe and calculate sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC). In the 25 included studies, the pooled estimate of CEUS studies for sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 87% (95% CI 85-88), 89% (95% CI 87-91) and 78.84 (95% CI 29.40-211.40), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and DOR were 86% (95% CI 84-88), 82% (95% CI 77-86) and 26.34 (95% CI 8.32-83.39), respectively, for the CECT studies. Sensitivity, specificity and DOR were 85% (95% CI 82-88), 87% (95% CI 83-91) and 48.37 (95% CI 15.87-147.45), respectively, for the CEMRI studies. SROC analysis indicated that the diagnostic value of CEUS for FLLs is not significantly different from that of CECT and CEMRI.
在一项荟萃分析中,评估了对比增强超声(CEUS)、对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)和对比增强磁共振成像(CEMRI)在局灶性肝病变(FLL)患者中的诊断性能。使用 Meta-Disc 版本 1.4 描述和计算灵敏度、特异性、综合受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)。在 25 项纳入的研究中,CEUS 研究的汇总估计值为灵敏度、特异性和诊断比值比(DOR)分别为 87%(95%CI 85-88)、89%(95%CI 87-91)和 78.84(95%CI 29.40-211.40)。CECT 研究的灵敏度、特异性和 DOR 分别为 86%(95%CI 84-88)、82%(95%CI 77-86)和 26.34(95%CI 8.32-83.39)。CEMRI 研究的灵敏度、特异性和 DOR 分别为 85%(95%CI 82-88)、87%(95%CI 83-91)和 48.37(95%CI 15.87-147.45)。SROC 分析表明,CEUS 对 FLL 的诊断价值与 CECT 和 CEMRI 无显著差异。