Epilepsy Unit, Division of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Seizure. 2011 Sep;20(7):554-7. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 May 4.
Levetiracetam (LEV) is a broad spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED) with a unique mechanism of action. This retrospective audit explores outcomes in patients commenced on LEV monotherapy at the Epilepsy Unit at the Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland from 1st January 2001 until 30th June 2009.
LEV monotherapy was started in 228 patients (89 men, 139 women, aged 12-81 years [median 28 years]). Of these, 161 (70.6%) had partial-onset seizures, 59 (25.9%) had idiopathic generalized epilepsies (35 primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures [PGTCS], 20 juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, 4 juvenile absence epilepsy), and 8 (3.5%) had unclassified GTCS. Initial dosing was 250 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by 500 mg twice daily. Patients were reviewed every 6-8 weeks. If required, the LEV dose was titrated in 500 mg increments to a maximum tolerated or effective dose.
In total, 112 (49.1%) patients remained seizure-free for ≥1 year on a median LEV dose of 1000 mg/day (range 500-3000 mg/day). Patients were more likely to achieve seizure freedom with LEV as a first monotherapy (81 of 149 [54.4%]), as opposed to switching from another AED (31 of 79 [39.2%]; p=0.03). In this latter group, seizure freedom was more likely in those who switched after failing their 1st or 2nd AED (n=39 of 64 [60.9%]), compared to later in the treatment schedule (n=2 of 15 [13.3%]; p=0.029). Patients reporting <5 seizures (70 of 118) prior to starting LEV were more likely to become seizure-free than those with ≥5 seizures (42 of 110; p=0.001). Thirty-six (15.8%) patients had a ≥50% seizure reduction over 1 year; 43 (18.9%) were classified as having a <50% improvement, but elected to continue on LEV. The drug was withdrawn in 37 (16.2%) patients (30 side effects, 7 lack of efficacy). Eighteen (7.9%) patients reported intolerable neuropsychiatric symptoms (7 aggression, 7 mood swings, 2 irritability, 2 depression). Other side effects leading to drug withdrawal included sedation (n=5) and lethargy (n=4).
Seizure freedom was achieved in around half the patients on a median LEV dose of 1000 mg/day. This was more likely to occur in those taking the drug as first monotherapy, and in those with <5 pre-treatment seizures. Around 50% of those who discontinued LEV due to side effects developed neuropsychiatric symptoms.
左乙拉西坦(LEV)是一种具有独特作用机制的广谱抗癫痫药物(AED)。本回顾性研究探讨了苏格兰格拉斯哥西部医务室癫痫科自 2001 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 6 月 30 日期间开始接受 LEV 单药治疗的患者的治疗结果。
228 例患者(89 名男性,139 名女性,年龄 12-81 岁[中位数 28 岁])开始接受 LEV 单药治疗。其中 161 例(70.6%)有部分发作性癫痫,59 例(25.9%)有特发性全面性癫痫(35 例原发性全面强直阵挛发作[PGTCS],20 例青少年肌阵挛癫痫,4 例青少年失神癫痫),8 例(3.5%)有未分类的全面强直阵挛发作。初始剂量为 250mg,每日两次,持续 2 周,然后增加至 500mg,每日两次。每 6-8 周对患者进行一次评估。如果需要,将 LEV 剂量增加 500mg,直至达到最大耐受剂量或有效剂量。
共有 112 例(49.1%)患者在中位数为 1000mg/天(范围 500-3000mg/天)的 LEV 剂量下保持无癫痫发作≥1 年。与从其他抗癫痫药物(AED)转换治疗相比(31/79[39.2%]),作为一线单药治疗时,患者更有可能实现无癫痫发作(81/149[54.4%];p=0.03)。在后一组患者中,与治疗计划后期相比(2/15[13.3%]),在失败使用第 1 或第 2 种 AED 后转换治疗的患者(n=39/64[60.9%])更有可能实现无癫痫发作(p=0.029)。在开始使用 LEV 之前报告有<5 次发作(70/118)的患者比有≥5 次发作的患者(42/110;p=0.001)更有可能实现无癫痫发作。36 例(15.8%)患者在 1 年内癫痫发作减少≥50%;43 例(18.9%)被归类为改善<50%,但选择继续使用 LEV。37 例(16.2%)患者停用 LEV(30 例因副作用,7 例因疗效不佳)。18 例(7.9%)患者报告出现无法耐受的神经精神症状(7 例攻击性,7 例情绪波动,2 例易怒,2 例抑郁)。其他导致停药的副作用包括镇静(n=5)和嗜睡(n=4)。
在中位数为 1000mg/天的 LEV 剂量下,约有一半的患者实现了无癫痫发作。这种情况更有可能发生在使用该药作为一线单药治疗的患者,以及在治疗前癫痫发作次数<5 的患者中。由于副作用而停止 LEV 治疗的患者中,约有 50%出现神经精神症状。