• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在社区心理健康环境中使用简短标准化结果测量工具的评定者间信度。

Interrater reliability of using brief standardized outcome measures in a community mental health setting.

机构信息

Departmentof Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2011 May;62(5):558-60. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0558.

DOI:10.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0558
PMID:21532087
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Given psychiatry's need to implement measurement-based care, the study examined whether direct-care staff could reliably administer brief positive and negative symptom instruments to track symptom changes and inform clinical decision making.

METHODS

Raters (82 case managers) were assessed at baseline. Training was provided for individuals not meeting reliability criteria. These individuals were reassessed to determine the effect of training. In addition, rater drift was assessed for raters judged to be reliable at baseline.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven percent of direct-care staff met criteria for reliability either at baseline or after they received additional training.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of direct-care staff can be trained to reliability on brief scales of positive and negative symptoms that can be used to guide clinical decision making.

摘要

目的

鉴于精神病学需要实施基于测量的护理,本研究探讨了直接护理人员是否能够可靠地使用简短的阳性和阴性症状量表来跟踪症状变化并为临床决策提供信息。

方法

在基线时对评定者(82 名个案经理)进行评估。对不符合可靠性标准的个人提供培训。对这些人进行重新评估,以确定培训的效果。此外,对被认为在基线时可靠的评定者进行评定者漂移评估。

结果

77%的直接护理人员在基线时或在接受额外培训后达到了可靠性标准。

结论

大多数直接护理人员可以接受培训,以达到简短阳性和阴性症状量表的可靠性标准,这些量表可用于指导临床决策。

相似文献

1
Interrater reliability of using brief standardized outcome measures in a community mental health setting.在社区心理健康环境中使用简短标准化结果测量工具的评定者间信度。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 May;62(5):558-60. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0558.
2
Reliability of global assessment of functioning ratings made by clinical psychiatric staff.临床精神科工作人员进行的功能总体评估评分的可靠性。
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Apr;56(4):434-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.4.434.
3
Interrater Reliability of Standardized Actors Versus Nonactors in a Simulation Based Assessment of Interprofessional Collaboration.基于模拟的跨专业协作评估中标准化演员与非演员之间的评分者间信度
Simul Healthc. 2015 Aug;10(4):249-55. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000094.
4
Does staff-patient agreement on needs for care predict a better mental health outcome? A 4-year follow-up in a community service.医护人员与患者就护理需求达成的共识能否预测更好的心理健康结果?一项在社区服务机构开展的为期4年的随访研究。
Psychol Med. 2008 Jan;38(1):123-33. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707000785. Epub 2007 May 31.
5
Planning Treatment and Assessing Recovery in Participants With Dual Diagnosis: Preliminary Evaluation of a New Clinical Tool.双重诊断患者的治疗规划与康复评估:一种新临床工具的初步评估
J Dual Diagn. 2016;12(1):55-62. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2016.1146555.
6
Interrater reliability in clinical trials of depressive disorders.抑郁症临床试验中的评分者间信度。
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;159(9):1598-600. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1598.
7
Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) in a naturalistic clinical setting: Inter-rater reliability and comparison with expert ratings.自然临床环境下的儿童总体评估量表(CGAS):评定者间信度与专家评定的比较。
Psychiatry Res. 2010 May 15;177(1-2):206-10. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
8
Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.儿童复发性腹痛多维测量方法的开发:在三种环境下开展的基于人群的研究
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e210-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1412.
9
Structured interview and uniform assessment improves diagnostic reliability.结构化访谈和统一评估可提高诊断可靠性。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2000 Summer;10(2):119-31. doi: 10.1089/cap.2000.10.119.
10
Measuring the impact of diagnostic decision support on the quality of clinical decision making: development of a reliable and valid composite score.衡量诊断决策支持对临床决策质量的影响:开发可靠且有效的综合评分
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):563-72. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1338. Epub 2003 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing reliability and validity for mental health screening instruments in resource-constrained settings: Systematic review of the PHQ-9 and key recommendations.在资源有限的环境中建立心理健康筛查工具的可靠性和有效性:PHQ-9 的系统评价及主要建议。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Sep;291:113236. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113236. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
2
Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Review and Clinical Guide for Recognition, Assessment, and Treatment.精神分裂症的阴性症状:识别、评估及治疗的综述与临床指南
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Feb 21;16:519-534. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S225643. eCollection 2020.
3
Implementing Outcome-based Care in Pediatric Psychiatry: Early Results and Overcoming Barriers.
在儿童精神病学中实施基于结果的护理:早期结果与克服障碍
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019 Feb 11;4(1):e132. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000132. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.
4
Conceptualization and treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia.精神分裂症阴性症状的概念化与治疗。
World J Psychiatry. 2015 Dec 22;5(4):352-61. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v5.i4.352.