Los Angeles, Calif., and New York, N.Y. From the Divisions of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center and Mount Sinai Medical Center.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 May;127(5):2005-2013. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf4d6.
In craniofacial microsomia, patients with severely hypoplastic mandibles (Pruzansky type III) require replacement of the ramus and condyle unit. Autogenous costocartilaginous rib graft and distraction osteogenesis are the most important techniques used, but long-term results need to be looked at to determine optimal management.
Of the 485 patients with craniofacial microsomia and mandibular abnormality identified by the authors' craniofacial multidisciplinary clinic, 31 patients were identified with Pruzansky type III mandibles who underwent treatment and were available for study. Patients primarily had either costocartilaginous grafts or mandibular distraction after molar extraction. Outcomes assessed rib failure, undergrowth, or overgrowth. Reoperation included regrafting for graft failure, rib distraction for undergrowth, and mandibular setback for overgrowth. Details surrounding complications for each modality including osteotomy site were recorded.
For primary mandibular reconstruction, 27 patients underwent costocartilaginous rib graft surgery (30 grafts, three bilateral) at 9.9 ± 4.1 years; four patients underwent mandibular distraction at 7.4 ± 2.3 years. Rib graft failure in seven of 30 cases (23 percent) required regrafting. Undergrowth in 17 cases (57 percent) required rib distraction. Overgrowth in three cases (10 percent) required correction at the time of orthognathic correction. For rib graft distraction, osteotomy site locations included native mandible (25 percent), rib-mandible junction (19 percent), and rib graft (56 percent). The rib-mandible junction site had graft-related complications (100 percent) that the other sites did not.
For the severely hypoplastic mandibles (Pruzansky type III), costocartilaginous grafts are an accepted modality. However, when rib graft growth is insufficient, secondary distraction should be performed within the native mandible or rib graft and not at the rib graft-mandible junction site.
在颅面短小畸形中,下颌骨严重发育不良的患者(普鲁赞斯基 III 型)需要置换关节突和髁突单元。自体肋软骨肋骨移植和牵张成骨是最重要的技术,但需要观察长期结果以确定最佳治疗方法。
作者的颅面多学科诊所共确定了 485 例颅面短小畸形和下颌骨异常的患者,其中 31 例为普鲁赞斯基 III 型下颌骨患者,他们接受了治疗并可供研究。患者主要接受肋软骨移植或拔牙后下颌骨牵引。评估结果包括肋骨失败、发育不良或过度生长。再次手术包括移植物失败的再移植、发育不良的肋骨牵引和过度生长的下颌骨后退。记录了每种治疗方式(包括截骨部位)的并发症细节。
在原发性下颌骨重建中,27 例患者接受了肋软骨肋骨移植手术(30 例,双侧 3 例),年龄为 9.9±4.1 岁;4 例患者在 7.4±2.3 岁时接受了下颌骨牵引。30 例中的 7 例(23%)肋骨移植失败需要再移植。17 例(57%)发生发育不良需要肋骨牵引。3 例(10%)在正颌矫正时需要矫正过度生长。对于肋骨移植牵引,截骨部位包括下颌骨(25%)、肋骨-下颌骨交界处(19%)和肋骨移植物(56%)。肋骨-下颌骨交界处的移植物相关并发症发生率为 100%,而其他部位没有这种并发症。
对于严重发育不良的下颌骨(普鲁赞斯基 III 型),肋软骨移植是一种可接受的治疗方法。然而,当肋骨移植生长不足时,应在原生下颌骨或肋骨移植物内而不是在肋骨移植物-下颌骨交界处进行二次牵引。