Department of Anesthesiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2011 Aug;39(8):1913-21. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821b85c6.
Red cell distribution width is a predictor of mortality in the general population. The prevalence of increased red cell distribution width and its significance in the intensive care unit are unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between red cell distribution width at the initiation of critical care and all cause mortality.
Multicenter observational study.
Two tertiary academic hospitals in Boston, MA.
A total of 51,413 patients, aged ≥ 18 yrs, who received critical care between 1997 and 2007.
None.
The exposure of interest was red cell distribution width as a predictor of mortality in the general population. The prevalence of increased red cell distribution width and its significance in the intensive care unit are unknown and categorized a priori in quintiles as ≤ 13.3%, 13.3% to 14.0%, 14.0% to 14.7%, 14.7% to 15.8%, and >15.8%. Logistic regression examined death by days 30, 90, and 365 postcritical care initiation, inhospital mortality, and bloodstream infection. Adjusted odds ratios were estimated by multivariable logistic regression models. Adjustment included age, sex, race, Deyo-Charlson index, coronary artery bypass grafting, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, hematocrit, white blood cell count, mean corpuscular volume, blood urea nitrogen, red blood cell transfusion, sepsis, and creatinine. Red cell distribution width was a particularly strong predictor of all-cause mortality 30 days after critical care initiation with a significant risk gradient across red cell distribution width quintiles after multivariable adjustment: red cell distribution width 13.3% to 14.0% (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.30; p <.001); red cell distribution width 14.0% to 14.7% (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.16-1.42; p <.001); red cell distribution width 14.7% to 15.8% (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.52-1.86; p <.001); red cell distribution width >15.8% (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 2.37-2.86; p <.001), all relative to patients with red cell distribution width ≤ 13.3%. Similar significant robust associations postmultivariable adjustments are seen with death by days 90 and 365 postcritical care initiation as well as inhospital mortality. In a subanalysis of patients with blood cultures drawn (n = 18,525), red cell distribution width at critical care initiation was associated with the risk of bloodstream infection and remained significant after multivariable adjustment. The adjusted risk of bloodstream infection was 1.40- and 1.44-fold higher in patients with red cell distribution width values in the 14.7% to 15.8% and >15.8% quintiles, respectively, compared with those with red cell distribution width ≤ 13.3%. Estimating the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve shows that red cell distribution width has moderate discriminative power for 30-day mortality (area under the curve = 0.67).
Red cell distribution width is a robust predictor of the risk of all-cause patient mortality and bloodstream infection in the critically ill. Red cell distribution width is commonly measured, inexpensive, and widely available and may reflect overall inflammation, oxidative stress, or arterial underfilling in the critically ill.
红细胞分布宽度是预测普通人群死亡率的指标。在重症监护病房中,红细胞分布宽度增加的患病率及其意义尚不清楚。本研究的目的是调查重症监护开始时红细胞分布宽度与全因死亡率之间的关系。
多中心观察性研究。
马萨诸塞州波士顿的两家三级学术医院。
共纳入 51413 名年龄≥18 岁的患者,他们在 1997 年至 2007 年间接受了重症监护。
无。
感兴趣的暴露是红细胞分布宽度作为一般人群死亡率的预测指标。红细胞分布宽度增加的患病率及其在重症监护病房中的意义尚不清楚,并在预先设定的五分位数中分类为≤13.3%、13.3%至 14.0%、14.0%至 14.7%、14.7%至 15.8%和>15.8%。Logistic 回归分析了重症监护开始后第 30、90 和 365 天的死亡、住院死亡率和血流感染。通过多变量逻辑回归模型估计调整后的优势比。调整包括年龄、性别、种族、Deyo-Charlson 指数、冠状动脉旁路移植术、心肌梗死、充血性心力衰竭、血细胞比容、白细胞计数、平均红细胞体积、血尿素氮、红细胞输血、败血症和肌酐。红细胞分布宽度是重症监护开始后 30 天全因死亡率的一个特别强的预测指标,在多变量调整后,红细胞分布宽度五分位数之间存在显著的风险梯度:红细胞分布宽度 13.3%至 14.0%(比值比[OR],1.19;95%置信区间[CI],1.08-1.30;p<.001);红细胞分布宽度 14.0%至 14.7%(OR,1.28;95%CI,1.16-1.42;p<.001);红细胞分布宽度 14.7%至 15.8%(OR,1.69;95%CI,1.52-1.86;p<.001);红细胞分布宽度>15.8%(OR,2.61;95%CI,2.37-2.86;p<.001),均与红细胞分布宽度≤13.3%的患者相比。在多变量调整后,也观察到与重症监护后第 90 天和第 365 天死亡以及住院死亡率相关的类似显著稳健关联。在进行了血液培养(n=18525)的患者亚分析中,重症监护开始时的红细胞分布宽度与血流感染的风险相关,并且在多变量调整后仍然具有统计学意义。与红细胞分布宽度≤13.3%的患者相比,红细胞分布宽度值在 14.7%至 15.8%和>15.8%五分位数的患者血流感染的风险分别高出 1.40-和 1.44 倍。估计受试者工作特征曲线下面积表明红细胞分布宽度对 30 天死亡率具有中等的判别能力(曲线下面积=0.67)。
红细胞分布宽度是重症患者全因死亡率和血流感染风险的有力预测指标。红细胞分布宽度通常是可测量的、廉价的和广泛可用的,它可能反映了重症患者的整体炎症、氧化应激或动脉充盈不足。