Lock James
Professor of Child Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Minerva Psichiatr. 2010 Sep;51(3):207-216.
Although eating disorders are common psychiatric disorders that usually onset during adolescence, few evidence-based treatments for this age group have been identified. A critical review of treatments used for Anorexia Nervosa (AN) and Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and related conditions (EDNOS) is provided that summarizes the rationale for the treatments, evidence of effectiveness available, and outcomes. METHOD: Critical review of published randomized clinical trials (RCTs). RESULTS: There are only seven published RCTs of psychotherapy for AN in adolescents with a total of 480 subjects. There are only two published RCTs for outpatient psychotherapy for adolescent BN with a total of 165 subjects. There are no published RCTs examining medications for adolescent AN or BN. For adolescent AN, Family-Based Treatment (FBT) is the treatment with the most evidence supporting its use. Three RCTs suggest that FBT is superior to individual therapy at the end of treatment; however, at follow-up differences between individual and family approaches are generally reduced. For adolescent BN, one study found no differences between Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and FBT at the end of treatment or follow-up, while the other found FBT superior to individual therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the evidence remains limited, FBT appears to be the first line treatment for adolescent AN. There is little evidence to support a specific treatment for adolescent BN. There is a need for additional studies of treatment of child and adolescent eating disorders. New treatments studies may build on current evidence as well as examine new approaches based on novel findings in the neurosciences about cognitive and emotional processes in eating disorders.
尽管饮食失调是常见的精神疾病,通常在青春期发病,但针对该年龄组的循证治疗方法却很少。本文对用于神经性厌食症(AN)、神经性贪食症(BN)及相关病症(未特定指明的饮食失调,EDNOS)的治疗方法进行了批判性综述,总结了这些治疗方法的理论依据、现有疗效证据及治疗结果。方法:对已发表的随机临床试验(RCT)进行批判性综述。结果:仅有七项已发表的关于青少年AN心理治疗的RCT,共涉及480名受试者。仅有两项已发表的关于青少年BN门诊心理治疗的RCT,共涉及165名受试者。尚无已发表的RCT研究青少年AN或BN的药物治疗。对于青少年AN,基于家庭的治疗(FBT)是有最多证据支持其使用的治疗方法。三项RCT表明,在治疗结束时FBT优于个体治疗;然而,在随访时个体治疗和家庭治疗方法之间的差异通常会缩小。对于青少年BN,一项研究发现认知行为疗法和FBT在治疗结束或随访时没有差异,而另一项研究发现FBT优于个体治疗。结论:尽管证据仍然有限,但FBT似乎是青少年AN的一线治疗方法。几乎没有证据支持针对青少年BN的特定治疗方法。需要对儿童和青少年饮食失调的治疗进行更多研究。新的治疗研究可以在现有证据的基础上进行,也可以基于神经科学中关于饮食失调的认知和情感过程的新发现来研究新的方法。