Institut für Evolutionsbiologie und Ökologie, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 21;6(4):e18794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018794.
Application oriented ontologies are important for reliably communicating and managing data in databases. Unfortunately, they often differ in the definitions they use and thus do not live up to their potential. This problem can be reduced when using a standardized and ontologically consistent template for the top-level categories from a top-level formal foundational ontology. This would support ontological consistency within application oriented ontologies and compatibility between them. The Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) is such a foundational ontology for the biomedical domain that has been developed following the single inheritance policy. It provides the top-level template within the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies Foundry. If it wants to live up to its expected role, its three top-level categories of material entity (i.e., 'object', 'fiat object part', 'object aggregate') must be exhaustive, i.e. every concrete material entity must instantiate exactly one of them.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: By systematically evaluating all possible basic configurations of material building blocks we show that BFO's top-level categories of material entity are not exhaustive. We provide examples from biology and everyday life that demonstrate the necessity for two additional categories: 'fiat object part aggregate' and 'object with fiat object part aggregate'. By distinguishing topological coherence, topological adherence, and metric proximity we furthermore provide a differentiation of clusters and groups as two distinct subcategories for each of the three categories of material entity aggregates, resulting in six additional subcategories of material entity.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We suggest extending BFO to incorporate two additional categories of material entity as well as two subcategories for each of the three categories of material entity aggregates. With these additions, BFO would exhaustively cover all top-level types of material entity that application oriented ontologies may use as templates. Our result, however, depends on the premise that all material entities are organized according to a constitutive granularity.
面向应用的本体对于在数据库中可靠地进行数据通信和管理非常重要。不幸的是,它们在使用的定义上常常存在差异,因此没有发挥出它们的潜力。当使用顶级形式基础本体的标准化和本体一致的模板来为顶级类别提供模板时,可以减少这个问题。这将支持面向应用的本体中的本体一致性和它们之间的兼容性。基本形式本体(BFO)是一种用于生物医学领域的基础本体,它是遵循单一继承策略开发的。它在开放生物和生物医学本体铸造厂中提供顶级模板。如果它想发挥其预期作用,它的三个顶级物质实体类别(即“物体”、“虚构物体部分”、“物体集合”)必须是详尽无遗的,即每个具体的物质实体必须恰好实例化其中之一。
方法/主要发现:通过系统地评估物质构建块的所有可能基本配置,我们表明 BFO 的物质实体顶级类别并不详尽无遗。我们提供了生物学和日常生活中的例子,证明了需要增加两个额外的类别:“虚构物体部分集合”和“具有虚构物体部分集合的物体”。通过区分拓扑一致性、拓扑粘附和度量接近度,我们进一步为每个物质实体集合的三个类别提供了集群和组的区分,从而为物质实体的六个额外子类别提供了区分。
结论/意义:我们建议将 BFO 扩展为纳入两个额外的物质实体类别以及每个物质实体集合的三个类别中的两个子类别。通过这些增加,BFO 将详尽地涵盖面向应用的本体可能用作模板的所有顶级物质实体类型。然而,我们的结果取决于所有物质实体都是根据构成粒度进行组织的前提。