• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2000-2008 年期间,结直肠癌腹腔镜切除术的全国应用趋势。

National trends in the uptake of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer, 2000-2008.

机构信息

School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2011 May 2;194(9):443-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03056.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03056.x
PMID:21534898
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the trends in the uptake of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective analysis of Australia-wide data on elective resections for colorectal cancer over the 8 financial years 2000-01 to 2007-08, obtained from the National Hospital Morbidity Database.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

National trends in annual percentage of colorectal resections for cancer that were conducted laparoscopically for each year, stratified by hospitals conducting a high volume of elective resections (40 or more/year) versus a low volume, and by public versus private hospitals.

RESULTS

For all Australian hospitals combined, the percentage of resections for colon cancer conducted laparoscopically increased from 2.4% in 2000-01 to 27.5% in 2007-08. For rectal cancer, this increase was from 1.1% to 21.5%. The largest increases were seen in high-volume private hospitals (colon cancer, 2.7% to 34.1%; rectal cancer, 1.5% to 26.2%), but increases also occurred in high-volume public hospitals (colon cancer, 2.7% to 32.2%; rectal cancer, 0.5% to 20.3%), low-volume private (colon cancer, 3.8% to 27.1%; rectal cancer, 2.4% to 25.5%) and low-volume public (colon cancer, 1.1% to 17.0%; rectal cancer, 0.5% to 13.8%) hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer has increased throughout Australian hospitals. Our findings provide the data necessary to ensure adequate resource allocation by the appropriate medical bodies to achieve optimal success in the uptake of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in Australia.

摘要

目的

探讨腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的应用趋势。

设计和设置

回顾性分析 2000-01 年至 2007-08 年 8 个财政年度澳大利亚全国范围内的择期结直肠癌切除术的全国性数据,这些数据来自国家医院发病率数据库。

主要观察指标

每年接受腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的结直肠癌比例的全国趋势,根据每年进行 40 例以上择期切除术的医院(高容量医院)和低容量医院以及公立医院和私立医院进行分层。

结果

对于所有澳大利亚医院,腹腔镜结肠癌切除术的比例从 2000-01 年的 2.4%增加到 2007-08 年的 27.5%。对于直肠癌,这一比例从 1.1%增加到 21.5%。最大的增长发生在高容量私立医院(结肠癌,2.7%至 34.1%;直肠癌,1.5%至 26.2%),但高容量公立医院(结肠癌,2.7%至 32.2%;直肠癌,0.5%至 20.3%)、低容量私立医院(结肠癌,3.8%至 27.1%;直肠癌,2.4%至 25.5%)和低容量公立医院(结肠癌,1.1%至 17.0%;直肠癌,0.5%至 13.8%)也出现了增长。

结论

澳大利亚各医院腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的应用有所增加。我们的发现为适当的医疗机构提供了必要的数据,以确保资源的合理分配,从而在澳大利亚实现腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的最佳成功率。

相似文献

1
National trends in the uptake of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer, 2000-2008.2000-2008 年期间,结直肠癌腹腔镜切除术的全国应用趋势。
Med J Aust. 2011 May 2;194(9):443-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03056.x.
2
Cost savings for elective laparoscopic resection compared with open resection for colorectal cancer in a region of high uptake.在高采用率地区,与开放性切除术相比,选择性腹腔镜切除术治疗结直肠癌的成本节约情况。
Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1515-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3345-1. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
3
Uptake and outcomes of laparoscopically assisted resection for colon and rectal cancer in Australia: a population-based study.澳大利亚腹腔镜辅助结直肠癌切除术的应用和结局:一项基于人群的研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Apr;57(4):415-22. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000060.
4
No Difference in Overall Survival Between Hospital Volumes for Patients With Colorectal Cancer in The Netherlands.荷兰结直肠癌患者的医院治疗量与总生存率之间无差异。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Oct;59(10):943-52. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000660.
5
Adoption of Robotic Technology for Treating Colorectal Cancer.采用机器人技术治疗结直肠癌。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Nov;59(11):1011-1018. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000688.
6
A National study on the adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly population: current state and value proposition.一项关于腹腔镜结直肠手术在老年人群中应用的全国性研究:现状和价值主张。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Oct;23(10):965-972. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02082-y. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
7
Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for rectal cancer.预测增加直肠癌腹腔镜利用的机会。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1556-1563. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5844-y. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
8
Study of colorectal cancer resection patterns across the state of Victoria using validated administrative data algorithms.使用经过验证的行政数据算法研究整个维多利亚州的结直肠癌切除术模式。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Mar;90(3):308-313. doi: 10.1111/ans.15710. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
9
The role of caseload in determining outcome following laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: an observational study.腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术后病例量在确定结局中的作用:一项观察性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):134-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3139-5. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
10
Multicenter Stratified Comparison of Hospital Costs Between Laparoscopic and Open Colorectal Cancer Resections: Influence of Tumor Location and Operative Risk.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌切除术医院成本的多中心分层比较:肿瘤位置和手术风险的影响
Ann Surg. 2017 Dec;266(6):1021-1028. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002000.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated With Prolonged Operative Times in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy and Its Association With Short-Term Outcomes.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术手术时间延长的相关因素及其与短期结局的关联
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;131(2):143-150. doi: 10.1002/jso.27872. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy: a comparative study of short-term economic and clinical outcomes.机器人与腹腔镜直肠切除术:短期经济和临床结局的比较研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jun 7;38(1):161. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04446-1.
3
Laparoscopic vs. open resection for colon cancer-quality of oncologic resection evaluation in a medium volume center.
腹腔镜与开放手术治疗结肠癌——中等规模中心肿瘤切除质量评估
Exp Ther Med. 2022 May 20;24(1):455. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11382. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Time trends in the incidence rates of venous thromboembolism following colorectal resection by indication and operative technique.按适应证和手术技术分类的结直肠切除术后静脉血栓栓塞发生率的时间趋势。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Nov;24(11):1405-1415. doi: 10.1111/codi.16233. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
Acquiring Advanced Laparoscopic Colectomy Skills - The Issues.掌握高级腹腔镜结肠切除术技能——相关问题
Malays J Med Sci. 2020 Oct;27(5):24-35. doi: 10.21315/mjms2020.27.5.3. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
6
The financial burden of complications following rectal resection: A cohort study.直肠切除术后并发症的经济负担:一项队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(19):e20089. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020089.
7
Do Diagnostic and Procedure Codes Within Population-Based, Administrative Datasets Accurately Identify Patients with Rectal Cancer?基于人群的行政数据集内的诊断和操作代码能否准确识别直肠癌患者?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Feb;23(2):367-376. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4043-z. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
8
Isolated rectal cancer surgery: a 2007-2014 population study based on a large administrative database.孤立性直肠癌手术:一项基于大型行政数据库的2007 - 2014年人群研究。
Updates Surg. 2017 Sep;69(3):367-373. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0445-9. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
9
Assessing measures of comorbidity and functional status for risk adjustment to compare hospital performance for colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective data-linkage study.评估合并症和功能状态指标以进行风险调整,比较结直肠癌手术的医院绩效:一项回顾性数据关联研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Jul 15;15:55. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0175-1.
10
Reduced perioperative death following laparoscopic colorectal resection: results of an international observational study.腹腔镜结直肠切除术后围手术期死亡风险降低:一项国际观察性研究结果
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3628-39. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4119-8. Epub 2015 Mar 12.